This is an extremely rude post to place here. Challenging people to respond in ways forbidden by the forum is unfair.And yet a man can claim to be a women, claim to have periods, and have babies ~ and secularism is ok with that. Even make laws enforcing this flat earth religion upon the nation.
That's what I call a flat earth religion and a bunch of believers who blindly follow it in a fundamentalist fervor.
This is an extremely rude post to place here. Challenging people to respond in ways forbidden by the forum is unfair.
It is against the rules of the forum for people to defend non-conservative attitudes towards gender identity or sexuality, so I will not.
However to characterise the attitudes as being religious and analogous to Flat Earth beliefs is incorrect.
Also to characterise transgender people as "claiming to have periods and have babies" is also incorrect as any kind of general trend.
I have never seen a single instance of a someone who identified as a transgender woman (that is someone who was identified as male at birth then underwent transition) claiming to have periods and have babies.
(Note, I am not defending or supporting transgender or sexuality attitudes, just pointing out false statements of fact).
Ah yes, so you were completely mistaken.Striving for ‘Menstrual Equity,’ Oregon Puts Tampons in Men’s Bathrooms
This latest madness, which affects every public school and college in Oregon, is expected to cost up to $400 per tampon dispenser.www.dailysignal.com
Transgender men can appear at a glance as … men, but
One step cl
Nice general rule... but it fails at edge cases.Think I will just stick with the Funk and Wagnalls definition of female.
Thanks anyway.
What does the word female mean?
Part of speech: noun
A person or animal of the female sex.
Part of speech: adjective
Of or pertaining to the sex that brings forth young or produces ova; feminine.
Nice general rule… but it fails at edge cases.
Although some secularists do follow "flat Earth religions", so to speak, I think that all the rest of us (secularist and otherwise) make it a moot quandary.I am simply curious how secularists who question how some Christians follow flat earth while supporting a real flat earth religion of their own.
Quite a quandary I think.
The ability to see details of outer planets and their moons on home telescopes seems to get ignored by Flat Earthers who believe "It's just a star".
Book a flight it's not hard to see it for yourself.I think it's flat and I don't understand why Christianity doesn't hold that belief as well.
I think it'd be what Christianity would be all about and the idea that it is flat does make sense if you look at the evidence and makes us special and belonging to and taken care of by God. I've found that the idea is immediately attacked and dismissed and there's plenty of smear videos that don't really address the topics that those whom have done extensive research upon the matter have discovered; it's merely if you believe it's flat, you're an idiot; which I think is quite out of line, especially for Christians.
I have yet to hear even one proof why it is flat. Maybe my favorite one I hear is, the sun peaking through a hole in the clouds spreads out rays way too soon (too wide a pattern) for the sun to be 93 million miles away. Well, what's wrong with that one is, the sun in the firmament (according to the distance I was told) is still too far away to produce such a pattern.I think it's flat and I don't understand why Christianity doesn't hold that belief as well.
I think it'd be what Christianity would be all about and the idea that it is flat does make sense if you look at the evidence and makes us special and belonging to and taken care of by God. I've found that the idea is immediately attacked and dismissed and there's plenty of smear videos that don't really address the topics that those whom have done extensive research upon the matter have discovered; it's merely if you believe it's flat, you're an idiot; which I think is quite out of line, especially for Christians.
I have yet to hear even one proof why it is flat. Maybe my favorite one I hear is, the sun peaking through a hole in the clouds spreads out rays way too soon (too wide a pattern) for the sun to be 93 million miles away. Well, what's wrong with that one is, the sun in the firmament (according to the distance I was told) is still too far away to produce such a pattern.
All I hear is discounting of evidence the earth is globular, and positive claims (assertions) that prove nothing —only make ya go, "hmmm".
They get views on Youtube which generates income. I suspect that is the motivation for many.
Sorry to hear it.I think it's flat
Because it isn't true.and I don't understand why Christianity doesn't hold that belief as well.
Two excellent reasons: 1) Christianity isn't about the shape of the earth, and B) the Earth is an oblate spheroid.I think it'd be what Christianity would be all about
None at all.and the idea that it is flat does make sense
Of which there is none.if you look at the evidence
Except that is doesn't happen to be the way that God actually designed the cosmos.and makes us special and belonging to and taken care of by God.
Probably because that the idea earth is flat is rubbish.I've found that the idea is immediately attacked and dismissed
True. And geocentrism is as true as, say, Euroentrism. It's all a matter of perspective. I'd submit that Middle Tennessee is also the center of the universe - my universe, anyway. Is it the barycenter of God's universe? Nope, not even close.Geocentricism is different from flat Earth.
I'm an Electrical Engineer (or was when I worked for a living), and try as I might, I've never found Ohm's Law in the Bible, even though God unarguably created it.where that all goes wrong is when you try to take the Bible as a science book instead of a theological one. It is about how God relates to mankind, NOT the details on how God created inanimate objects.
Since "round eath doctrine" happens to be true, you'd hope a cartographer would conform to it.Sure... and your livelihood depended on conforming to "round earth" doctrine.