Finally, the My Pillow Guy Will Have His Day in Court!

[cow451]

Prove is innocence by proving fraud, which I'm sure he'd consider a victory.

Your fantasy is admirable. But he can win the case without "proving" anything except he believed what he was saying and therefore meant no harm.

Given the nature of The Big Lie, it cannot be "proven" without naming people perpetrating the massive/widespread fraud. Who do you think perpetrated this gargantuan fraud?

 

[Estrid]

Like what? The Miracle on Ice or when the Jets upset the Colts in Super Bowl 3 or when what?

The Rules of Debate call for you to say, " has not", or,
more properly, to fold.

 

[cow451]

The Rules of Debate call for you to say, " has not", or,
more properly, to fold.

The rules of the Christian Forums "trump" the rules of debate.

 

[Ceallaigh]

He's going to be the one that's going to do that where all the others have failed because... reasons?

A win at this point would be a settlement that does not lead to life long financial ruin.

Reasons? You'd have to ask him. I haven't seen his evidence. You're assuming he doesn't have anything substantial. And you're most likely right. But it's still conjecture. I mean if I told you I was 100% sure Donald Trump would be the next president a few years ago, what would you have said to that?

 

[Ceallaigh]

Your fantasy is admirable. But he can win the case without "proving" anything except he believed what he was saying and therefore meant no harm.

Given the nature of The Big Lie, it cannot be "proven" without naming people perpetrating the massive/widespread fraud. Who do you think perpetrated this gargantuan fraud?

It's not my fantasy, it's Lindell's.

 

[cow451]

It's not my fantasy, it's Lindell's.

So you don't believe The Big Lie? I apologize in that case.

 

[Desk trauma]

Reasons?
You'd have to ask him.

I do not have the mans contacts details nor would I contact him if I did as I already have a sufficient amount of big lie believers in my life. You however are posting here as if there is a real chance he's on to something.

I haven't seen his evidence. You're assuming he doesn't have anything substantial. And you're most likely right. But it's still conjecture.

Based on, as I said before, billion dollar media companies with resources this man could not dream of having back peddling at top speed to avoid being involved in this suit. He has nothing to support his claims and in short order he will have literally nothing if continues this case.

 

[rturner76]

Reasons? You'd have to ask him. I haven't seen his evidence. You're assuming he doesn't have anything substantial. And you're most likely right. But it's still conjecture. I mean if I told you I was 100% sure Donald Trump would be the next president a few years ago, what would you have said to that?

"The American people could never be that thick!" That's what I would have said and probably did say. I could have never been more wrong. People even still follow him after he proved to be a losing bet. Narcissism will not allow his brain to accept that he lost anything to anyone ever. A Narcissist must ALWAYS "win." He lost and it just won't compute. It does not compute for mindless drones either.

*Sorry, I got a little rant going there. I don't hate the man, I just think he has nothing to offer our government in terms of plans or strategy. The main strategy seems to be "become one of us or you're a Commie."

 

[Ceallaigh]

I do not have the mans contacts details nor would I contact him if I did as I already have a sufficient amount of big lie believers in my life. You however are posting here as if there is a real chance he's on to something.



Based on, as I said before, billion dollar media companies with resources this man could not dream of having back peddling at top speed to avoid being involved in this suit. He has nothing to support his claims and in short order he will have literally nothing if continues this case.

No I'm saying that I don't know if he's onto something or not. I can theorize and come to a foregone conclusion, but can't say what the outcome will be with 100% certainty.

 

[Estrid]

The rules of the Christian Forums "trump" the rules of debate.

Ha. Too clever by one half.
Just to prove my point, I copy herewith full
text of the response I elicited from no less
august a body than the very League of Nations
itself.

"We find no exceptions to the Rules of Debate, as they
are among the declared International Human Rights,
as permanent and certain as the Principle of EiR.

With regard to your other (we believe fatuous) Inquiry
concerning "the world's most interesting poster", we are
unable to find any reference to such, no more than we can
of the so- called South African gold fields, also so much recently
in the news."

 

[TLK Valentine]

Lindell says he welcomes the lawsuit so that he can prove his accusations of fraud are true. He obviously believes he will win. I can't say for sure he won't.

He obviously believes his own nonsense. He probably will "win."

But by "win," we only mean successfully defend himself... nothing more.

Sorry, but in this country, we don't unseat presidents based on MyPillow Guy's feelings.

 

[Larniavc]

Lindell says he welcomes the lawsuit so that he can prove his accusations of fraud are true. He obviously believes he will win. I can't say for sure he won't.

Why did it take being sued to pony up the evidence?

 

[Tigger45]

I'd hold off buying any pillows for now. Dominion will be practically giving them away to recoup their winnings.

 

[loveofourlord]

Future textbooks will be mostly fiction.

Given the textbooks in places like Texas they already are.

 

[loveofourlord]

Thank you for responding to this for me. I guess Fox News and Newmax hasn't been reporting on this.

Probably don't want to draw attention to the fact that they are in danger of being sued too if they haven't already, lost track of all who was being sued heh.

 

[loveofourlord]

Mike Lindell's net worth is listed as $300 million, so he's going to have a hard time coughing up $1.3 billion. Maybe he has a GoFundMe page.

True, but lawsuits are two things. One to be punitive, if it isn't high enough it won't hurt. And two, they always get negotiated down, same with the lawsuit against guilani. It's the same principle as to bartering heh. You start high and low till you get to what you really want.

 

[Ceallaigh]

Why did it take being sued to pony up the evidence?

Perhaps it's was the only way he's able to present it in court?

 

[trunks2k]

I think with the case of Lindell, Dominion has a tough case to make to meet the burden of proving libel. They have a better case with Powell/Linn.

 

[cow451]

Ha. Too clever by one half.
Just to prove my point, I copy herewith full
text of the response I elicited from no less
august a body than the very League of Nations
itself.

"We find no exceptions to the Rules of Debate, as they
are among the declared International Human Rights,
as permanent and certain as the Principle of EiR.

With regard to your other (we believe fatuous) Inquiry
concerning "the world's most interesting poster", we are
unable to find any reference to such, no more than we can
of the so- called South African gold fields, also so much recently
in the news."

When did the League of Nations last meet?

 

[cow451]

Perhaps it's was the only way he's able to present it in court?

LOL, hardly.