EVIDENCE showing the President lied repeatedly about his knowing and involvement in Hunter's business

[BPPLEE]

Republican witnesses ... testified on Thursday that evidence of an impeachable crime by Biden is lacking

Not evidence of guilt, mind you. Just evidence of the existence of a crime.

That’s why an inquiry is needed.

 

[KCfromNC]

That’s why an inquiry is needed.

And now that all the witnesses have said there's nothing to this, is it time to move on to something more productive? You know, like maybe preventing a government shutdown?

Or should they keep investigating even when everyone with knowledge of the situation is saying there's nothing there?

 

[BPPLEE]

And now that all the witnesses have said there's nothing to this, is it time to move on to something more productive? You know, like maybe preventing a government shutdown?

Or should they keep investigating even when everyone with knowledge of the situation is saying there's nothing there?

There is a difference in suspicion and evidence. Evidence is not a requirement at this point. Evidence is needed to impeach not to inquire about impeachment.

 

[Pommer]

Maybe he should take joe's place in November 2024.

I wouldn’t vote for Hunter, he’s shady.

 

[KCfromNC]

There is a difference in suspicion and evidence. Evidence is not a requirement at this point. Evidence is needed to impeach not to inquire about impeachment.

At some point it would seem the complete lack of evidence would matter to the GOP.

 

[Say it aint so]

That’s why an inquiry is needed.

That's why Rudy Giuliani, Lev Parnas, and Devon Archer need to testify.
They are all direct evidence witnesses, and not anything like these set of witnesses who kindly took time off their right wing talk punditry and provided absolutely nothing germane. To no one's surprise, Comer and the clown car won't have that happen.

 

[BPPLEE]

Well hey, since the GOP are all about oversight of influence peddling, I'm sure they will get right on that.
Comer, himself it looks shady, but he's too busy trying to pull a rabbit out the hat.

Was Kushner still serving in cabinet when he received the payment?

 

[Say it aint so]

Was Kushner still serving in cabinet when he received the payment?

I think we already established that, but be careful, you're making an argument for the Biden's. But apparently to Comer and the gang it doesn't matter if anyone was still a member of government or not.

 

[BPPLEE]

I think we already established that, but be careful, you're making an argument for the Biden's.

If he did something wrong he should be held accountable . The articles indicate the investment was after he left the White House and it was an investment not a payment.

Jared Kushner's Post-White House $2 Billion Saudi Investment Sparked Ethical Debate and Saudi Skepticism Due to 'Inexperience' and 'Public Relations Risks'

Just months after leaving the White House in 2021, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a Saudi crown prince-led fund, despite objections from the fund’s advisers about the deal. A panel that screens investments for the Saudi sovereign wealth fund expressed concerns about Kushner’s...

finance.yahoo.com

 

[Say it aint so]

If he did something wrong he should be held accountable

Again, there is reason why Jared and wife couldn't pass a security clearance. His actions are exhibit 1 and 1A.

 

[Say it aint so]

If he did something wrong he should be held accountable . The articles indicate the investment was after he left the White House and it was an investment not a payment.

Jared Kushner's Post-White House $2 Billion Saudi Investment Sparked Ethical Debate and Saudi Skepticism Due to 'Inexperience' and 'Public Relations Risks'

Just months after leaving the White House in 2021, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a Saudi crown prince-led fund, despite objections from the fund’s advisers about the deal. A panel that screens investments for the Saudi sovereign wealth fund expressed concerns about Kushner’s...

finance.yahoo.com

I hold the view, that if he did something wrong he should be held accountable. As you just stated, you hold that view. But unfortunately the current Oversight committee holds the view that it depends on who was doing wrong as to who should be held accountable.

 

[BPPLEE]

Again, there is reason why Jared and wife couldn't pass a security clearance. His actions are exhibit 1 and 1A.

Kushner's FBI background check identified questions about his family's business, his foreign contacts, his foreign travel and meetings he had during the campaign, the sources said, declining to be more specific.

 

[BPPLEE]

I hold the view, that if he did something wrong he should be held accountable. As you just stated, you hold that view. But unfortunately the current Oversight committee holds the view that it depends on who was doing wrong as to who should be held accountable.

It is Biden’s DOJ that bears that responsibility not the oversight committee. And they blocked attempts to open an investigation into Biden

 

[KCfromNC]

It is Biden’s DOJ that bears that responsibility not the oversight committee. And they blocked attempts to open an investigation into Biden

If so, that would just be part of a long standing DOJ tradition not to investigate sitting presidents.
If is carrying a lot of weight in my last sentence, though.

 

[Say it aint so]

It is Biden’s DOJ that bears that responsibility not the oversight committee. And they blocked attempts to open an investigation into Biden

It's the current oversight committee who are yelling from the rafters about influence peddling. The DOJ is investigating Joe Biden for the things they have a just cause to start an investigation.

 

[Say it aint so]

If so, that would just be part of a long standing DOJ tradition not to investigate sitting presidents.
If is carrying a lot of weight in my last sentence, though.

Secrets in Joe's garage and Penn office. He is under investigation.

 

[BPPLEE]

If so, that would just be part of a long standing DOJ tradition not to investigate sitting presidents.
If is carrying a lot of weight in my last sentence, though.

We were discussing a cabinet member not the President

 

[BPPLEE]

It's the current oversight committee who are yelling from the rafters about influence peddling. The DOJ is investigating Joe Biden for the things they have a just cause to start an investigation.

Not according to the whistleblowers,

 

[Say it aint so]

Not according to the whistleblowers,

Who have been refuted.

 

[BPPLEE]

Secrets in Joe's garage and Penn office. He is under investigation.

There wasn’t a search warrant at those locations with agents armed to the teeth was there?