Yttrium
Independent Centrist
- May 19, 2019
- 3,890
- 4,315
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Skeptic
- Marital Status
- Single
If Joe was doing it while in office, then yes. Hunter namedropping his dad for Hunter's own benefit doesn't count as influence peddling for his dad.I would say selling the influence of a sitting VP or President is already illegal but then I am not a lawyer like some on this forum.
Yes, money laundering is illegal. But vague innuendo doesn't count as evidence.I believe money laundering is already illegal as well. Multiple shell companies with no discernible business purpose millions paid to a crack addict who has no skills or training in the field for which he is being paid?
I'm never going to be convinced either way, because I don't do convinced. My brain doesn't work that way. Hunter's unethical shenanigans don't automatically incriminate Joe. I don't have a good opinion of Joe. He could very well be a crook, but I do want to see some hard evidence of wrongdoing before we start convicting him, and all you've got so far is innuendo. If there was any hard evidence, the impeachment proceedings would already be well underway.If some are convinced all is on the up and up here they probable would need a signed written confession and a video confession from Joe himself to be convinced. Not sure some would be convinced even then.
Upvote
0