Except for the fact that Trump used the office to engage in business and threaten foreign leaders to world funds for favors.They were in legitimate business before Trump took office and did not use Trump's position as President to engage is business, or threaten foreign leaders to withhold funds for favors.
No there isn't.Seems like there is a little video show Biden bragging about such activities.
Why is it bad for Hunter Biden to be a better businessman than Trump?What is hilarious is that you think $20 million dollars for who's knows what purpose is unimportant.
Except for the fact that Trump used the office to engage in business and threaten foreign leaders to world funds for favors.
No there isn't.
This deserves no real comment it is so absurd. Well look there I just made a comment.Why is it bad for Hunter Biden to be a better businessman than Trump?
Let's be clear, you deny that the House investigation has bank records, cancelled checks, emails , texts and testimony proving the current occupant is corrupt. Millions for shell companies that provide no known service to anyone?For that post to have any validity, you'd need to provide facts to support the false claims therein.
You missed the audio recordings?No evidence no consideration!
There is nothing to ignore.Yes there is sorry you missed it or ignored it. I could post it but it is so well known that would bee a waste of server space.
Trump lost money with a casino, where people give you their money. Hunter Biden was apparently making money right and left, and the right can't stand it because apparently they oppose someone living the American dream.This deserves no real comment it is so absurd. Well look there I just made a comment.
NxNW's denial aside, I've been looking into your post #85, and I still can't see any real evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden. There's possibly a little innuendo here and there, but the bulk of the evidence concerns Hunter, who is a private citizen. You keep asking for a rebuttal of the evidence, but I don't see anything to rebut.Let's be clear, you deny that the House investigation has bank records, cancelled checks, emails , texts and testimony proving the current occupant is corrupt. Millions for shell companies that provide no known service to anyone?
They have the evidence all you have is a denial.
I still can't see any real evidence of wrongdoing by Joe Biden.
There's possibly a little innuendo here and there,
Just a private citizen who rode airforce 2 and threw dads name around like candy or a carrot on a stick to foreigners. If you can't see anything to rebut here maybe try looking at the facts.but the bulk of the evidence concerns Hunter, who is a private citizen. You keep asking for a rebuttal of the evidence, but I don't see anything to rebut.
Hunter "living the American Dream" now that is a funny one! 10 points for creativity.Trump lost money with a casino, where people give you their money. Hunter Biden was apparently making money right and left, and the right can't stand it because apparently they oppose someone living the American dream.
Please tell me, which of these are illegal?Just a private citizen who rode airforce 2 and threw dads name around like candy or a carrot on a stick to foreigners. If you can't see anything to rebut here maybe try looking at the facts.
Nothing wrong with getting money from China.Receiving money from Hunter from China. Yea I guess those widgets Hunter is manufacturing are really beneficial to the Chinese people!
China is not an enemy state. It's a major trading partner with the US. It's normally not in the least bit unethical to do business with China.Well just a little. Does it really matter what service Hunter provided to an enemy state that eventually put money in Joe's pocket? We recently learned reoccuring payments to the big Guy from China through Hunter. Of course all is legit no there there.
I am looking at the facts. If you want to accuse Joe of wasting taxpayer money by letting Hunter ride on Air Force 2, fine, but that's neither illegal nor something that the House is pursuing. It's also perfectly fine for someone to namedrop their politically famous parents.Just a private citizen who rode airforce 2 and threw dads name around like candy or a carrot on a stick to foreigners. If you can't see anything to rebut here maybe try looking at the facts.
If all is well in glory land please tell me why the big Guy as repeatedly lied about business dealings with his son?Please tell me, which of these are illegal?
This kind of attitude is why we are here.Nothing wrong with getting money from China.
China is not an enemy state. It's a major trading partner with the US.
It's normally not in the least bit unethical to do business with China.
Which ones?I am looking at the facts
Well now you are right about the name dropping but what did they get in return for that name?If you want to accuse Joe of wasting taxpayer money by letting Hunter ride on Air Force 2, fine, but that's neither illegal nor something that the House is pursuing. It's also perfectly fine for someone to namedrop their politically famous parents.
If all is well in glory land please tell me why the big Guy as repeatedly lied about business dealings with his son?
I haven't seen those emails even though I did hear about Joe's personal email accounts. Would you please give me an idea where I can find the text from these emails online? Thanks.It is a FACT he has lied on numerous occasions as proved by the FACTS in the investigation. Emails to Hunter and those business partners under fake email accounts by the Big Guy.
Sorry, as far as I know, none of those things are illegal. Could you tell me which one/s are and how you know they are?To answer your question. If you do not see any illeagality here there is no amount of evidence that will convince you.
What did who get?Well now you are right about the name dropping but what did they get in return for that name?
Something like oh you are Joe's son here is a few million because the Chinese really like that name.
Considering the vast amount of trade we do with them, yeah, we're pretty close.This kind of attitude is why we are here.
Ok, then they must then be a close ally.
He's a private citizen. If the Chinese want to shower millions on him whenever he smiles or waves a picture of his dad around, that's fine.Nothing normal about this situation. Business usually involves a product or legitimate service. What was Hunters service , product or expertise?
I'm looking for any facts that will help get him out of office next year. I'd like him to be a single term president.Which ones?
I hold my nose and look the other way because it's perfectly legal. You're welcome to push for laws that ban that kind of thing, but I don't think you're going to get very far with that. Both Republicans and Democrats are too fond of doing it.Well now you are right about the name dropping but what did they get in return for that name?
Something like oh you are Joe's son here is a few million because the Chinese really like that name.
This whole affair stinks and way too many just hold their nose, look the other way.
I haven't seen those emails even though I did hear about Joe's personal email accounts. Would you please give me an idea where I can find the text from these emails online? Thanks.
I would say selling the influence of a sitting VP or President is already illegal but then I am not a lawyer like some on this forum. I believe money laundering is already illegal as well. Multiple shell companies with no discernible business purpose millions paid to a crack addict who has no skills or training in the field for which he is being paid?I hold my nose and look the other way because it's perfectly legal. You're welcome to push for laws that ban that kind of thing, but I don't think you're going to get very far with that. Both Republicans and Democrats are too fond of doing it.
This is just one article of many, took 2 seconds on Google.
None of which are actually linked to here.If all is well in glory land please tell me why the big Guy as repeatedly lied about business dealings with his son?
It is a FACT he has lied on numerous occasions as proved by the FACTS in the investigation.