You assumed my statement was conclusive. It wasn't.
When Cain murdered his brother he broke God's law of human conscience.
He knew what he was doing was wrong. But by what standard?
What I posted
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If there is no law we can't break it. Right?
You are assuming that sin is always the transgression of the law. (a sabbatarian hangover) But the Bible says that sin came before the law. (Rom.5:13) What law was that sin breaking?
It was so long ago you probably forgot my stance, but from the beginning there was the eternal law of God, which Lucifer broke before the earth was even formed.
At one time the people of the earth got so rotten that God killed all but eight from the line of Seth.
I start before the earth was formed. Sabbatarians start at Moses, but Galatians 3 tells us that the law was added because of transgressions already existing. Thus sin was before the law.
What purpose then
does the law
serve? It was added because of
transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made;
and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator.
Jesus is the Seed, and is the replacement for the law. It all has to do with SIN. That's why the law came, but
only until Christ who took care of sin once and for all, not the law. You talk like the law was bad and Jesus came to free us from the law. NO!!! Jesus freed us from
SIN, the
reason for the law. It wasn't the law that kept us in bondage; it was sin. Jesus says those who sin are a slave to sin, and He came to free us from sin. John 8:34-36; 1 John 3:5
Look at Daniel 9:24 the prophecy of why Jesus was coming.
To finish the
transgression,
To make an
end of sins,
To make
reconciliation for iniquity,
To
bring in everlasting righteousness,
It doesn't say to finish the LAW,
to make an end of the LAW
It couldn't be clearer.