tas8831
Well-Known Member
- May 5, 2017
- 5,611
- 4,000
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
That's actually an interesting thought and I've tried. Whole genome sequences are not that easy to come by. I've always wanted to see comparisons of arctic wild like, especially bears and wolves. Still no luck and it's been a while since I seriously researched this stuff.
You can try here:
Home - Genome - NCBI
But there is really no need to wait until entire genomes are available. Nearly any pair of kinds you can imagine have at least many kilobases (I imagine) of available sequence to compare.
The bonobo and common chimp genomes are available.
As far as direct comparisons to the human genome to the chimpanzee genome the idels are massive. Highly conserved brain related genes would have had to accept major overhauls are be built from scratch. The most basic concept behind the inductive approach to science is one of cause and effect relationships. When it comes to brain related genes mutations are a wrong answer, that much I'm 100% sure of.
Odd that people who do this type of research for a living disagree.
Upvote
0