Sure it is: "he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations" (Dan. 9.27).
"Overspreading of abominations" does not equal "abomination of desolation". Overspreading of abominations refers to what Jesus was talking about in Matt 23:
37 O
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!
38
Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
What the Roman army did is mentioned in Dan. 9.26: "the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary." There is no mention of an abomination set up or idol. There is no 7 year period around 70 AD. You're confused.
Yes, Jesus sent the Roman armies to destroy/desolate Israel because of their abominations in killing those sent to them. It has nothing to do with the 70th week. Daniel 9
does not say that Israel would be desolated during the 70th week.
It is because they killed Jesus during the 70th week (among other things) that they are desolated in 70AD.
I know, that's why the "abomination" in Dan. 9.27 of the 70th week has nothing to do with 70 AD.
ok.
Then why are you trying to fit the abomination of desolation into the 70th week? The abomination of desolation occurred in 70AD and has nothing to do with the 70th week.
The abomination is set up not by Israel but by the False Prophet during the Tribulation and cancel's Israel's sacrifices: "the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations" (Dan. 9.27).
No, Jesus sacrifice during the middle of the 70th week caused sacrifice and oblation to cease. Jesus was cut off in the middle of that 70th week.
26 And
after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:
and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
I never said the Antichrist will destroy the Temple. Neron Kaiser (666 in Aramaic) will be the future Antichrist. "People of the [future] prince" (Dan. 9.26).
Then obviously Daniel 9:26 does not refer to the antichrist, as you claim.
"
and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary"
"The prince" (Dan. 9.27) is that Antichrist not Jesus. You are worshiping the wrong person.
The angel said who "the prince that shall come" was in Daniel 9:
25 Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem
unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall
Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of
the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
You just agreed that the antichrist doesn't destroy the city and the sanctuary and then now you are insisting that he does.