You can believe whatever you want . But God warns about eternal fire so often . Why use that terminology and confuse so many ?
Well, there are many sayings in the Bible that confuse your average reader.
It's a spiritual book that needs to be rightly divided and spiritually discerned.
For example: Many Christians today misunderstand the word: "repent."
CF - My Biblical Case for Repentance
Repent can have a wide variety of meanings and it has been used in different ways in the Bible.
In other words, it is a homonym and yet some believers do not realize this fact.
There are also metaphors that many Christians get mixed up at times, too.
This one example:
Biblical Metaphors Shed Light on Ham's Sin in Noah's Tent. Introduction: The Bible has metaphors (or similitudes) within it. For Hosea 12:10 says, "I have also spoken by the prophets, and I have multiplied visions, and used similitudes, by the ministry of the prophets." To not understand...
www.christianforums.com
Just say the word fire without using the word eternal.
I believe why most hold to Eternal Torment is because they do not understand that the word "forever" (and some of its related synonyms) does not always mean "for all eternity" in the Bible. Sure, sometimes the word “forever” can mean “for all eternity,” but not always. Why do I say that?
Well, I heard a pastor once say that the best way to interpret the Bible is to let the Bible do the interpreting for you.
In other words, the word "forever" (and its related words) does not always mean ”for all eternity” in the Bible. “Forever” can be talking about "forever" here on this Earth (as long as someone lives) or in having a sense of "completeness" or "totality" for a specific temporal thing). For what do you make of the following verses below that say that "forever" (or it's related words) does not mean “for all eternity?”
•
Isaiah 34:9-10 mentions a city in the region of Idumea (of the people of Edom) and how its burning pitch will not be quenched night or day, and the smoke of that city will go up forever. However, again, the Earth (Where Idumea resides) will pass away (
Matthew 24:35) (
Revelation 21:1). Note: Please pay special attention to this passage. It also mentions “
night, “
day” and “
for ever and ever” just like
Revelation 20:10.
• The Israelites and their sons were to keep the Passover “forever” (
Exodus 12:24).
•
Exodus 27:21 says Aaron and his sons must keep the lamps burning as a statute (law) forever unto their generations (descendants).
Exodus 28:43 says that Aaron and his sons must wear certain pieces of clothing when they enter the Tabernacle. This was to be a statute (law) unto Aaron and his sons forever. The Aaronic Priesthood was to be an "everlasting" priesthood (
Exodus 40:15). However, the Aaronic priesthood was temporary, and it was replaced by the priesthood order of Melchisedec (
Hebrews 7:11-19).
• Habakkuk tells us of mountains that were "everlasting" until -- they “were scattered” (
Habakkuk 3:6).
• The children of Israel were to "observe the Sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant" (
Exodus 31:16)-until -- Paul states there remains "another day" of rest for the people of God (
Hebrews 4:8-9) and they are not to let others judge them if they don’t keep the Sabbath days (
Colossians 2:14-17).
• The fire for Israel's burnt offering (animal sacrifice) is never to be put out (
Leviticus 6:12-13), and yet -- Christ offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, and sat down on the right hand of God (
Hebrews 10:12).
• Jonah describes how the earth with her bars was about him forever when he was in the fish (
Jonah 2:6), until--the Lord delivers him from the large fish's belly on the third day (
Jonah 1:17).
• The forts and towers shall be for dens (animal habitations) for ever, until -- the Spirit is poured out (
Isaiah 32:13-16).
• The King James Bible, as well as many other translations, tells us that a bond slave was to serve his master "forever" (
Exodus 21:6). This obviously would be only until his death.
• In
Philemon 1:15: Paul mentioned to Philemon how Onesimus was going to return back to him (his master) forever. Obviously Onesimus is not an immortal man still living upon the Earth with his master (Philemon) today. He was returning back to his master forever within the context of their temporary lives upon the Earth.
So the word "forever" as used in the Bible is true. It does mean "forever" but it is talking in "forever" under the context of within either a temporary Covenant, or here upon this Earth (which is temporal), or within the Lake of Fire (Which is also a temporary place). For example: A husband can say to his wife that he will be with her forever. But of course, this talking in context of "forever" as being here upon this Earth. In many cases, words such as "everlasting" or "forever" can be in context to a particular thing that is temporal within the Bible.
Source used:
(Please take note that I do not agree with everything these Christian authors believe, say, or do).
(I also adjusted some of his points on his list, as well).
Apttpteach
But the Bible does say eternal. Matthew 18:8.
Matthew 18:8
Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast
them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into
everlasting fire.
Habakkuk tells us of mountains that were "everlasting" until -- they “were scattered” (
Habakkuk 3:6) (KJB).
Other translations say shattered, etcetera.
Explaining Matthew 25:46:
“And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.” (
Matthew 25:46).
What does “eternal judgment” mean in
Hebrews 6:2? It’s pretty simple; God judges, and the result is everlasting. Few traditionalists (i.e. Eternal Torment proponents), if any, argue that this verse teaches that God is continually judging for eternity, banging his gavel and repeatedly declaring saved or unsaved the same finite number of existent people. But wait a minute; it doesn’t say “the eternal results of judgment.” It says “eternal judgment.” Following the reasoning applied to
Matthew 25:46, this verse must teach that God is continually in the act of judging! In other words, the consequences of the punishment are everlasting, and not the act of punishing that is ongoing. In fact, if we compare Scripture with Scripture, we discover exactly what this“everlasting punishment” actually is.
In
2 Thessalonians 1:9. It says, “Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;” (KJV).
So the wicked will be destroyed. Their everlasting punishment is…. everlasting destruction! Destruction means it is not around anymore. Something that is destroyed is no more. If I tell you I will destroy a piece of paper, I will either shred it, or burn it, etc.; It will be no more from what it used to be. It will cease to function in the manner that it was. It was destroyed. So
Matthew 25:46 is referring to an everlasting punishment. This punishment has everlasting consequences and it is everlasting destruction (i.e. something that will be no more). Just as there is an “eternal judgment” mentioned in Scripture. A one time judgment with eternal consequences, and not a court like judgment that will stretch out into eternity for all time. Therefore, there will also be an “everlasting punishment” (
Matthew 25:46), or a punishment that has everlasting consequences by an “everlasting destruction” (
2 Thessalonians 1:9). It will be a destruction or ruin, or end of the wicked that has everlasting consequences.
Now, some try to say that comparing “everlasting life with everlasting punishment” is proof of Eternal Torment.
However, if we were to look more closely at
Matthew 25:46:
Everlasting is the parallel (which speaks of the eternal consequences).
Both life and death (destruction, i.e. the punishment) have eternal consequences or effects.
But life and death (punishment) is the contrast.
So the verse is one part parallel and one part contrast.
As I already pointed out, the "everlasting punishment" is said to be "everlasting destruction" in
2 Thessalonians 1:9, which is death.
So the contrast is life (reward) and death (punishment).
And everlasting is the parallel.
Anyways, if ECT (Eternal Conscious Torment) was true, the verse would say,
"And these shall go away into everlasting life to be tortured in flames: but the righteous into life eternal to be in peaceful bliss." (
Matthew 25:46 ECT Influenced Translation).
But the verse doesn't really say that, though; So
Matthew 25:46 is not a solid case in proving Eternal Torment. At first glance, a person may get this impression when reading it, but we know that many verses in Scripture can be easily misunderstood with a quick reading (if we are not careful to compare Scripture with Scripture).
Sources used in this post:
(Please take note that I do not agree with everything these Christian authors believe, say, or do; I am merely posting the source links to show that I quoted them at certain times for the point of my article):
Daniel 12:2 Does Not Teach Eternal Torment | Rethinking Hell
Matthew 25:46 Does Not Prove Eternal Torment – Part 1 | Rethinking Hell