- Aug 10, 2007
- 994
- 328
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Why would God call a man who trusted in his own righteousness my servant?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why would God call a man who trusted in his own righteousness my servant?
We're on Job. Why did God call Job His servant? Did He ever stop calling Job His servant? Was Job ever, from the beginning of the book of Job, through the last chapter, NOT a servant of God?
It is Romans 10.1. A typo.
God loves all men but if they have not come to Christ and saved then they go to hell and are not servants of God.
So, what you are saying, is Saul and the unbelieving Jews were not servants of God, but Job was. Hence Job was in a saved condition. Is that your point?
IF so, let's look at something Paul said to the Galatian believers (servants of God):
Gal 1:6 I am amazed that you (believers in Galatia) are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel ; 7 which is really not another ; only there are some (i.e., the Judaizers) who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed ! 9 As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received, he is to be accursed !
To be in a saved condition, one must be trusting in God's righteousness and not the flesh. Then one is a servant of God, and it applies both in NT and OT times.So, what you are saying, is Saul and the unbelieving Jews were not servants of God, but Job was. Hence Job was in a saved condition. Is that your point?
In Romans 1.1 Paul says that his prayer is for those without knowledge, that they might be saved. If any man is not saved, then he is under the judgement of God, and bound for the fires of hell. He is not accepted by God and your claim that he is, is outside of evangelical Christianity and heretical and you have no business taking part on a Christian forum.
Job was lacking in knowledge indeed but it was not knowledge of the Almighty God that he lacked but knowledge about the spiritual pathway he was on where man must walk by faith. The other comments about Paul are untenable with orthodox Christianity as he was said to be God's enemy of the cross not God's servant.
I have never read such twisting of the scriptures nor such bad exegesis and can only issue a warning to you that your teaching is not from the Holy Spirit.
MOD HAT ON!!!!!
I would like to remind you all to focus on the thread topic and discuss it respectfully. Goading and flaming each other is inappropriate and not what Christ would do, therefore, please stop doing that. I would hate to need to close down this thread.
MOD HAT OFF!!!!!
What makes you think he is referring to you?Could you be more precise about what you are objecting to please so l can avoid it in the future? Thanks.
i agree...if i was in Job's shoes (and in my own circumstances,) i need His assurance and comfort, desperately, and i mean desperately.....and i also keep in mind that God has promised that He will never ever give us more than we can bear, and as i think on it, i can't help but look at God's timing with Job and why He intervened at that very moment that He did with Job....