666--Mark of the Beast, Food for Thought

[racer]

Interesting points to ponder:

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ka5v0REv8Us&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ka5v0REv8Us&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[Stryder06]

Anything dealing with a physical mark is completely and utterly wrong. To know what the mark is you have to fist know who the beast it. It's about your mind and your works. You're not going to get tattooed

 

[pgp_protector]

Is this the same Chuck Missler that complained that he never found anything evolving out of his Peanut Butter ?

 

[Stryder06]

To be fair, I listened to the video. It's still incorrect. The translation is what it is.

 

[JamesAH]

Anything dealing with a physical mark is completely and utterly wrong. To know what the mark is you have to fist know who the beast it. It's about your mind and your works. You're not going to get tattooed

Anything dealing with a symbolic mark is completely and utterly wrong.

 

[Stryder06]

Anything dealing with a symbolic mark is completely and utterly wrong.

So you believe the mark is literal?

 

[DD2008]

Link: Homeschooling math got you down? « bore me to tears

That link gives the point of view of an atheist like some on here have professed their deep admiration for.

 

[racer]

Okay, listen to this guy. I believe he is the man of which Missler speaks in the first message:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GtquNNEO7Fw&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GtquNNEO7Fw&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[racer]

You guys, nobody is posting anything here as fact. Just trying to discuss something that doesn't lead to Prot vs Cath/Ortho. If your urge is only to say something sarcastic or rude, don't feel obligated. If you're not iterested or can't articulate your disagreement with these men's ideas in a conversational manner, please skip it.

 

[racer]

Link: Homeschooling math got you down? « bore me to tears

That link gives the point of view of an atheist like some on here have professes their deep admiration for.

Feel free to explain what this has to do with the OP at anytime.

 

[DD2008]

Feel free to explain what this has to do with the OP at anytime.

It's some atheist that claims the words on the pope hat add up to 666.

 

[racer]

It's some atheist that claims the words on the pope hat add up to 666.

Oh, well then the gentleman in the 2nd youtube clip I posted addresses that very well. He says it is what is called "Gamatria." He says that this is anti-biblical and God does/did not promote it.

 

[LiturgyInDMinor]

Non-literal mark.

 

[racer]

Here's Shoebat with Zola Levitt:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6uNof7CiowE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6uNof7CiowE&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[Norbert L]

Well a well rounded summation of probably most if not all different theories about 666 is on a wiki page here:

Number of the Beast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seems most everyone has their pet theory they like.

BTW from the wiki's reading, the idea of corresponding that name towards Isalm isn't exactly a new idea either.

I believe especially in the case of interpretating prophecy, it can be an area where men mold it's meaning into the terms they want to believe rather than what it actually means. And even those who get those prophecies 100% correct, a second look at these two verses should be taken:

"Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, ... And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!'" (Mat 7:22,23)

 

[visionary]

As with all things.. time will tell.

 

[MariaRegina]

Mod Hat/on

Thanks for your patience.

Upon staff consensus, all deleted posts have been restored.

Please continue posting.


Mod Hat/off​

 

[zeke37]

the mark is for sure symbolic...a thing of the mind....(between eyes/forhead)

and it is physical...what you do....(hand)



but the mark is not a tattoo or chip....


and it is not a forced thing...that would prove nothing




we see that God has a mark that He places on folks
and it is explained with the same exact symbology

see Ex 13, Deut 6 and Deut 11


either one has this mark for God,

or one has this mark for the beast...






it all depends on who/Who you believe is God...

the false Jesus comes first before any gathering to Christ
to deceive the potential bride


the part of the potential bride, who is seduced/beguiled and worships the false lamb (turned from virgin bride in waiting, to harlot)
will think Satan, the supernatural fallen angelic being, is Jesus returned,
thus Satan will be God to them....
they will have his mark


as for 666 that is Satan's number...
many believe that the number 6 represents man...or mortalness.

we have to look to the bible to see what it says about 666
and a couple of the references are...

-Solomon's gold
-the fiery furnace dimensions
-6th seal/6th trump/6th vial

any others that anyone knows about?

 

[racer]

Is this the same Chuck Missler that complained that he never found anything evolving out of his Peanut Butter ?

Hey what's that post about? The picture that says "thanks again doc.state.ok.us for giving me the IP link? I don't get it?

 

[pgp_protector]

Hey what's that post about? The picture that says "thanks again doc.state.ok.us for giving me the IP link? I don't get it?

The Post or the Sig ?

The Post is questioning if the Person the OP is talking about is the same one that tries to argue that Peanut Butter Should Evolve into a Living Life Form.