- Apr 24, 2007
- 7,279
- 2,128
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Yes, I do. I want documentation also.
Look up federal relief from disability laws - and the NRA's history with them.
Upvote
0
Yes, I do. I want documentation also.
Nice.
But I won't abide by that.
Look up federal relief from disability laws - and the NRA's history with them.
One reason is that he’s not Voldemort so there’s probably no risk in saying his name.Your decision but why should we give this person any kind of recognition.
true -Really hard to do with a single or dual shot bolt action or a shotgun.
What does partisanship have to do with this discussion?This material addresses the restoration of gun-ownership rights for certain felons who do not pose a threat to the public safety and public interest. Individuals have not been able to apply for this restoration since 1992, so allowing individuals to petition a federal court for approval seems completely consistent with restoring felon's voting rights, which a certain political party loves to do by the millions...
Welcome my friend. I respect your decision.Nice.
But I won't abide by that.
Works for a bear.No one needs a semi-automatic to hunt rabbits, pigs and deer.
I guess we could go with “He who shall not be named.”Your decision but why should we give this person any kind of recognition.
The logic is that it would seem that he wants to revel in his notoriety. Jacinda Aherns proposition is that we should deny him that, and not even speak his name, so as he denied life to his victims, so we deny him the notoriety he craves. It makes perfect sense to me.View attachment 253240
I guess we could go with “He who shall not be named.”
One way of looking at it. Another is we would once again ignore the face of evil.The logic is that it would seem that he wants to revel in his notoriety. Jacinda Aherns proposition is that we should deny him that, and not even speak his name, so as he denied life to his victims, so we deny him the notoriety he craves. It makes perfect sense to me.
Don't have a lot of bears in NZ.Works for a bear.
He is still going to trial.One way of looking at it. Another is we would once again ignore the face of evil.
Other Kiwis.....just an aside....how do you feel about Queen Jacinda wearing a headscarf? To me that seems really weird. She never wears one, and now suddenly goes full scarfy. And saying they will put the Call to Prayer on TV - what the heck when even in parliament you can no longer say a prayer that mentions God.
What does partisanship have to do with this discussion?
I understand, by your posts, that you don't like guns and think that there should not be any guns.. well, maybe in the hands of trained professionals...Why worry about whether rocket man gets a nuke? Nukes don’t kill people, people kill people!
Guns don't kill people. People kill people, and not only with guns.
On the flip side..let's swing the pendulum the other way for a bit and see.
Ya.... two or three men there with 9mm in a holster under their arm.... that guy is toast... burnt toast.
Bring me a solution for the problem .... not the method.
Unless....we ban all knives, base ball bats, cars, ropes, lead pipes.....
Any objections to me owning ballistic missiles? Anti-air guns? Nuclear weapons?
If so, why?