Whatever. Your basic point, that no other president has "sided" with" a foreign adversary against the advice of our intelligence agencies, isn't true anyway.
Obviously Trump thought what he said was wrong or he wouldn't have tried to correct it.No. Got another question?
Why else would he make a correction if the first was correct?No, that is neither correct nor obvious.
He actually explains and amplifies his remarks when one of these accusations is hurled at him. That's what I remember him doing in this case, too, as I watched him on TV--definitely not a correction or a walking back of his original comments.Why else would he make a correction if the first was correct?
lol. We're talking about two different things. I'm talking about his remark in Helsinki, believing Putin over US intelligence.He actually explains and amplifies his remarks when one of these accusations is hurled at him. That's what I remember him doing in this case, too, as I watched him on TV--definitely not a correction or a walking back of his original comments.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Hurricane Center both initially included Alabama in the area possibly to be affected by Hurricane Dorian.
That one's really a fave among the GetTrump crowd, isn't it? And yet the argument is about as dumb as any that they've come up with.
The one he lied about his campaign team having any contact with during the election? Or the one he met in private with in the Oval Office? Or the one who seemed to be funneling money into his inauguration fund?It's not an argument. It's just a fact. Trump dismissed the US intelligence agencies in favor of a foreign power.
However, as everyone knows by now, by Sept. 1st, the time of Donald's tweet, Dorian had already taken a right turn and was headed up the coast towards the Carolinas, not across Florida towards Alabama, so the projection of a week earlier was moot. #sharpiegateHe actually explains and amplifies his remarks when one of these accusations is hurled at him. That's what I remember him doing in this case, too, as I watched him on TV--definitely not a correction or a walking back of his original comments.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the National Hurricane Center both initially included Alabama in the area possibly to be affected by Hurricane Dorian.