I just provided a couple of details I object to, and it was kept secret by the Democrats until just days ago. It was written with the idea not to force the president to close the border. But rather pointless because Joe is not obeying the laws on the books. All he has to do is reverse his edicts from the first hundred days to vastly improve the crisis.
It does not. (This is a lie someone has told you.) 5000/day for a week triggers a closure of the asylum system. Currently there is no such limit or authorization to suspend any part of asylum.
So? The intent is to deal with temporary surges. If they wanted to completely terminate asylum they would have written *that* into the law. (It also would have had no chance of passing the Senate.)
What are these "left wing causes". It's a pretty harsh border security bill and the left wing of the Democratic party is *not* behind it.
The DOA statement was only made when the bill was fully negotiated and released by someone who refused an offer to participate in the negotiations. Very bad faith on the part of "Speaker (for now) Mike".
It was not kept secret "by the Democrats" until sunday. It was still being negotiated and it was kept secret by all of the negotiators.
OK, sure.
Jeh Johnson was in charge of Homeland Security during the Obama administration and stated that 1000 immigrants a day would overwhelm the system. Legalizing 5000 illegals per day and then not forcing Joe to close the border (he has a temporary opt out in the bill) is pretty much saying let's try and legalize an invasion. That's why they hid it for so long and voted quickly before the American people could read the bill. More dishonesty from the senators involved.
The bill would codify 5000 into law. The Mayorkas impeachment is about the number of immigrants being let into the country and allowing trafficked women and children, criminals, and terrorists into our country.
There are such policies, during the Trump administration they did DNA tests on the children accompanied by adults. About 30% of the kids were not related to the adults. The Biden administration does not want to know, the trafficked kids would just be a distraction, so they let kids in without DNA testing. That's got to be a big plus for the cartels and they don't need to bother avoiding checkpoints. As to your second point, when was the last time the GOP told you that? I know some argued that Mexico diverting all of those troops to help with the border was not "paying" for the wall since it was not cash. But that in no way excuses Mayorkas and Biden and the major media from lying to the American people about a horrific border crisis, hiding the trafficking of woman and children and the role the U.S. government played in helping the cartels.
This is a go to strategy for some folks. Anything that is disagreed with become a hot bed of paedophillia. Could be this situation, drag queens, trans folks, political rivals and so on and so forth.
So no evidence of your claims, just more claims? Why not start a new thread for these new claims that are absolutely as true as the previous claims?
The volume of testimony of immigrants to our border agents along with the government admitted numbers crossing our borders is overwhelming evidence of the disaster. Public hearings have been held. The Biden administration that had stated the border was safe, secure, and closed now admits there is a border crisis.
Which bit was the evidence?The volume of testimony of immigrants to our border agents along with the government admitted numbers crossing our borders is overwhelming evidence of the disaster. Public hearings have been held. The Biden administration that had stated the border was safe, secure, and closed now admits there is a border crisis.
Scalise was back.
