• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Christian Nudists

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,629
✟95,400.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
does the bible never say its both?

What about the comment about the Image of God? I've found other sites say similar claims.
Are you interested in what the Bible has to say or more interested in what others say about the Bible? What others have to say about the Bible is religious trash protecting their lively hood. They care about their pocket book, not your soul. They need you under control and in their bondage.

bugkiller
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
About women having nothing of the image of God? Not at all. The Gen 1 verse I quoted says the exact opposite.

And beyond that, most of the OT descriptions of the Father are in feminine terms. the most obvious one is El Shaddai - with "shad" being the Hebrew for breast. I suppose a very literal translation would be something like "God - my breast." Of course it is an idiom meaning the all sufficient one like a mother being all the nutritional needs for her newborn. But the image of a nursing woman is an image of God supplying us with what we need.

So I ask you - do you take it that women "have absolutely nothing to do with the nature and appearance of God?"

Feminist theology teaches that there is a feminine side to God-the Bible presents him in a masculine way.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Feminist theology teaches that there is a feminine side to God-the Bible presents him in a masculine way.
Christian interpretation presents HIM in a masculine way. The actual text is more balanced.
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Christian interpretation presents HIM in a masculine way. The actual text is more balanced.

Bible view women - creation.com

The male imagery used to depict God is fundamentally different from the female similes found in Scripture. God may be like a mother in certain aspects, but He is Father; Jesus prayed to Him as Father and taught His disciples to do the same (Matt 6:9). The Second Person of the Trinity, Jesus Christ, became incarnate as a man, not a woman, and Jesus referred to the Holy Spirit with the pronoun “He” (John 14:16–17). These are not similes or metaphors, but teaching regarding the very nature of God and how He relates to His creation, and how the members of the Godhead relate to each other.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Darkhorse

just horsing around
Aug 10, 2005
10,078
4,001
mid-Atlantic
Visit site
✟303,401.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I realize that I'm stretching the boundaries for some people, but consider these hypotheticals:

1) You are alone at a pool, or pond, or lake, or creek.
No one is around, and no one is likely to appear.
You are not in view of the public.
It's a hot day and you would like to swim, but you have no swimsuit with you.
Assuming you would consider swimming alone (a safety issue), would you consider swimming there nude?

2) Same situation as above, but a same-sex friend is there with you.
Would you consider swimming there nude with your friend?

3) Same situation as above, but your spouse is there with you.
Would you consider swimming there nude with your spouse?

In each case, how does Christianity influence your decision?
 
  • Like
Reactions: toramei
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I can understand euphemisms, discreet drawings, etc.

But the idea of teaching that Adam and Eve were not naked after all is eisegesis - putting into the text - rather than exegesis - getting the meaning out of the text.

Isn't exegesis a type of eisegesis?
 
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,915
17,131
Canada
✟287,108.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Isn't exegesis a type of eisegesis?
No, exegesis is bringing out clearly the meaning that is already in the text; eisegesis is putting meaning into the text that isn't there (politicians and unfaithful preachers do it all the time).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No, exegesis is bringing out clearly the meaning that is already in the text; eisegesis is putting meaning into the text that isn't there (politicians and unfaithful preachers do it all the time).
LOL - and if you pull something out that is actually in there but stands in contrast to the other guy's beliefs - he accuses you of eisegesis.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: bugkiller
Upvote 0

HermanNeutics13

Regular Member
May 8, 2013
436
183
✟48,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Yeah that is why King David got into trouble.

bugkiller
Notice it was David and npt Bathsheba that got in trouble. It was not her fault she bathed at least in a public enough area to be seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: James Weir
Upvote 0

HermanNeutics13

Regular Member
May 8, 2013
436
183
✟48,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I think the command to be fruitful and multiply is about the only command that the human race has obeyed!
It isn't really true anymore, in AMerica if we maintain our current course we will become underpopulated and Europe is even worse because the birth rates are below 2 which is what is needed to maintain a steady population.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dayhiker
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Notice it was David and npt Bathsheba that got in trouble. It was not her fault she bathed at least in a public enough area to be seen.
It was not a public place. It was up on top of the house and the ONLY place around tall enough to look on it was the upper part of the Palace.
 
Upvote 0

Darkhorse

just horsing around
Aug 10, 2005
10,078
4,001
mid-Atlantic
Visit site
✟303,401.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My family and I spent a week at our favorite nudist resort enjoying the spring weather without any clothes at all.

As usual, there were several scheduled events, and lots of free time to swim, soak in the hot tub, lie in the sun, play volleyball, and talk with friends.

The scheduled events included karaoke, a wine-and-cheese social hour, a dance with a DJ, another dance with a band, a Sunday worship service, and a Memorial Day service with military speakers in attendance.

And all this took place with no lewd behavior, no sexual innuendo, and nothing unsuitable for children - which is good, because about a dozen children scampered around, especially in the pool.

Many people consider this lifestyle inappropriate for anyone, and certainly for Christians. One of our more-prolific posters here on CF will probably post articles on "Why Christians Can't Be Nudists" and similar topics.

I disagree.

My wife and I are Christian nudists and have raised our children as nudists.

Their sexual morals and attitudes are far "cleaner" than most young people their ages.

They are still virgins.

They avoid pornography.

My wife and I have been married almost 27 years (our only marriage), and have always been faithful to each other.

And many of the 200 people at the resort have the same experiences to report.


I think most Christians would benefit by adopting nudism.
 
Upvote 0

Darkhorse

just horsing around
Aug 10, 2005
10,078
4,001
mid-Atlantic
Visit site
✟303,401.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm reviving this thread mostly as an alternative to the other active "Christian nudist" thread, where the OP is seeking the views of those opposed to the idea of Christians being nudists.

This thread seeks posts from both opponents and proponents, and may provide interesting reading for new members who have joined CF in the last couple of years...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archivist
Upvote 0