Creationism Is Testable

[CaliforniaSun]

If humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys and why aren't they transforming into humans?

The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

Evolutionists were not there "millions" of years ago. They recast reality to explain anything they have no ready explanation for and glom onto any theory they find that makes them feel comfortable about the world and their place in it.

They just make this stuff up as they go along. Whereas Christians such as I always have the rock of ages, Jesus, to rely upon as a constant, consistent, force in my life.

YouTube - Born Again Christian Stephen Baldwin vs Atheist Richard Dawkins

 

[Ginger Elkhart]

What support does he have for any of this? Where was he 6 million years ago? It's all just conjecture on his part.

I have the Bible, and it says that God created man on the 6th day. Genesis 1:26. I can have a chart and put it up on the wall and speak with a snooty accent and make my case with the same level of proof as he does.

 

[mzungu]

What support does he have for any of this? Where was he 6 million years ago? It's all just conjecture on his part.

I have the Bible, and it says that God created man on the 6th day. Genesis 1:26. I can have a chart and put it up on the wall and speak with a snooty accent and make my case with the same level of proof as he does.

The Bible was written 300 years after the death of Jesus. So where were you when Moses left Egypt? Where were you when Noah built his Ark? A book written centuries after the supposed incident took place is hardly reliable proof!

I call double standards on this one!

 

[rjc34]

What support does he have for any of this? Where was he 6 million years ago? It's all just conjecture on his part.

Conjecture? No. Scientific consensus? Yes.

Perhaps you should hit up a natural history museum and see the fossils for yourself. Or alternatively you could take some university level genetics courses and analyse the sequenced genomes to clearly see that we are directly related to chimpanzees through said common ancestor.

I have the Bible, and it says that God created man on the 6th day. Genesis 1:26. I can have a chart and put it up on the wall and speak with a snooty accent and make my case with the same level of proof as he does.

And even for a second should I think that the bible is true? I await your circular argument.

 

[Flatland]

u cant just make up a theory and then call it scientific fact unless you have some evidence. theres a lot of "theory" in evolution but the truth is NONE of it can be tested because no scientist was there to compare a man today with the supposed monkey ape of yesterday

Evolution gets tested all the time. Saying that it can't be tested is one thing. But why don't you PROVE that it can't be tested?

you not only have to have evidence, you have to test your hypothesis and i know people will say "well, theres no evidence of creationism either" but the difference is we aren't going around saying its a scientifically proven fact like evolutionists are

Actually creatards claim that creationism is scientifically proven all the time. Ever heard of Kent Hovind or Ken Ham?

But Blayz, personally attacking me is not going to help your cause at all dear.

Stating the truth is not a personal attack. And it is your cause that needs all the help it can get. Our "cause" does not need help. Like not even a little bit.

 

[Flatland]

Evolution is true because a lot of smart elite scientists are willing to reject their own scientific method, not fully test the theory through all stages (if any), and deem it be correct based on drawings and philosophical logic that is not scientifically based, but it doesn't matter because they say its true, therefore it is.

He just said no strawman......

You already broke the rules.

 

[Flatland]

If humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys and why aren't they transforming into humans?

If humans are made from dirt, why are there still dirt and why aren't they transforming into humans?


I'm calling Poe on this one. No living human being is that stupid.

 

[CaliforniaSun]

What support does he have for any of this? Where was he 6 million years ago? It's all just conjecture on his part.

I have the Bible, and it says that God created man on the 6th day. Genesis 1:26. I can have a chart and put it up on the wall and speak with a snooty accent and make my case with the same level of proof as he does.

Every field of science supports this. Why would you so flippantly disregard 150 years of science?

This seems pretty "snooty" in my estimation.

 

[AV1611VET]

If humans are made from dirt, why are there still dirt and why aren't they transforming into humans?

It's "dust of the earth" -- and if it's supposed to still be around, why have I never seen you guys mention it?

I'm calling Poe on this one. No living human being is that stupid.

I'm calling Poe on this one.

 

[sfs]

The Bible was written 300 years after the death of Jesus.

No, it really wasn't. You're not helping any here.

 

[AV1611VET]

Every field of science supports this.

It takes a computer to correlate the data -- computers programmed by scientists loyal to specific paradigms.

One of my favorites:

 

[MoonLancer]

It takes a computer to correlate the data -- computers programmed by scientists loyal to specific paradigms.

One of my favorites:

Your right, it was pixies all along...

 

[CaliforniaSun]

Oh the irony.

It takes a computer to correlate the data -- computers programmed by scientists loyal to specific paradigms.

One of my favorites:

 

[Blayz]

It takes a computer to correlate the data -- computers programmed by scientists loyal to specific paradigms.

Interesting tangent. I wonder how many creationists can code.

And yes, I call a baby in the womb a baby, at least on occasion.

 

[AV1611VET]

I wonder how many creationists can code.

You mean code and keep their jobs?

I would say creationists who refuse to separate their beliefs from their work, don't work long.

That way, people can ask what contributions creationism make to society.

 

[gaara4158]

An even more interesting tangent: how on earth could someone incorporate a belief in creationism into their job as a coder?

 

[Blayz]

You mean code and keep their jobs?

Nope, just code.

I would say creationists who refuse to separate their beliefs from their work, don't work long.

You say alot of things unsupported by any evidence, we will just add this to the list.

That way, people can ask what contributions creationism make to society.

Also an interesting question.

 

[Split Rock]

Evolution is true because a lot of smart elite scientists are willing to reject their own scientific method, not fully test the theory through all stages (if any), and deem it be correct based on drawings and philosophical logic that is not scientifically based, but it doesn't matter because they say its true, therefore it is.

You know that since no scientist has ever taken the theory and put it through the scientific method, it cannot categorically be declared a scientific truth.

Here is a Pub Med search I just did on "evolution" : Results: 1 to 20 of 284917 evolution - PubMed result Yes, that's right... 284,917 peer reviewed papers on evolution. These papers show how researchers use the scientific method to test the theory of evolution. How many of these papers on evolution have you read? I will guess NONE. Spreading falsehoods is a Sin. Shame on you.

 

[Split Rock]

If humans evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys and why aren't they transforming into humans?

The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

Evolutionists were not there "millions" of years ago. They recast reality to explain anything they have no ready explanation for and glom onto any theory they find that makes them feel comfortable about the world and their place in it.

They just make this stuff up as they go along. Whereas Christians such as I always have the rock of ages, Jesus, to rely upon as a constant, consistent, force in my life.

What support does he have for any of this? Where was he 6 million years ago? It's all just conjecture on his part.

I have the Bible, and it says that God created man on the 6th day. Genesis 1:26. I can have a chart and put it up on the wall and speak with a snooty accent and make my case with the same level of proof as he does.

LOL! Good one, Ginger. You've got a bunch of 'em fooled that you're for real.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yes, that's right... 284,917 peer reviewed papers on evolution.

How many of them were named, Jesus?