• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Creationism Is Testable

Discussion in 'Creation & Evolution' started by Agonaces of Susa, Mar 7, 2011.

  1. CaliforniaSun

    CaliforniaSun Well-Known Member

    +40
    Atheist
    Private
    YouTube - Born Again Christian Stephen Baldwin vs Atheist Richard Dawkins
     
  2. Ginger Elkhart

    Ginger Elkhart A Christian voice

    72
    +9
    Christian
    Married
    US-Republican
    What support does he have for any of this? Where was he 6 million years ago? It's all just conjecture on his part.

    I have the Bible, and it says that God created man on the 6th day. Genesis 1:26. I can have a chart and put it up on the wall and speak with a snooty accent and make my case with the same level of proof as he does.
     
  3. mzungu

    mzungu INVICTUS

    +181
    Atheist
    Married
    The Bible was written 300 years after the death of Jesus. So where were you when Moses left Egypt? Where were you when Noah built his Ark? A book written centuries after the supposed incident took place is hardly reliable proof!

    I call double standards on this one!
     
  4. rjc34

    rjc34 Well-Known Member

    +16
    Humanist
    Single
    CA-Others

    Conjecture? No. Scientific consensus? Yes.

    Perhaps you should hit up a natural history museum and see the fossils for yourself. Or alternatively you could take some university level genetics courses and analyse the sequenced genomes to clearly see that we are directly related to chimpanzees through said common ancestor.

    And even for a second should I think that the bible is true? I await your circular argument.
     
  5. Flatland

    Flatland Junior Member

    202
    +5
    Atheist
    Evolution gets tested all the time. Saying that it can't be tested is one thing. But why don't you PROVE that it can't be tested?

    Actually creatards claim that creationism is scientifically proven all the time. Ever heard of Kent Hovind or Ken Ham?

    Stating the truth is not a personal attack. And it is your cause that needs all the help it can get. Our "cause" does not need help. Like not even a little bit.
     
  6. Flatland

    Flatland Junior Member

    202
    +5
    Atheist
    He just said no strawman......

    You already broke the rules.
     
  7. Flatland

    Flatland Junior Member

    202
    +5
    Atheist
    If humans are made from dirt, why are there still dirt and why aren't they transforming into humans?


    I'm calling Poe on this one. No living human being is that stupid.
     
  8. CaliforniaSun

    CaliforniaSun Well-Known Member

    +40
    Atheist
    Private
    Every field of science supports this. Why would you so flippantly disregard 150 years of science?

    This seems pretty "snooty" in my estimation.
     
  9. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +37,254
    Baptist
    Married
    It's "dust of the earth" -- and if it's supposed to still be around, why have I never seen you guys mention it?
    I'm calling Poe on this one.
     
  10. sfs

    sfs Senior Member

    +1,274
    Non-Denom
    Married
    No, it really wasn't. You're not helping any here.
     
  11. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +37,254
    Baptist
    Married
    It takes a computer to correlate the data -- computers programmed by scientists loyal to specific paradigms.

    One of my favorites:

    [​IMG]
     
  12. MoonLancer

    MoonLancer The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar

    +133
    Buddhist
    In Relationship

    Your right, it was pixies all along...
     
  13. CaliforniaSun

    CaliforniaSun Well-Known Member

    +40
    Atheist
    Private
    Oh the irony.
     
  14. Blayz

    Blayz Well-Known Member

    +212
    Atheist
    Married
    Interesting tangent. I wonder how many creationists can code.

    And yes, I call a baby in the womb a baby, at least on occasion.
     
  15. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +37,254
    Baptist
    Married
    You mean code and keep their jobs?

    I would say creationists who refuse to separate their beliefs from their work, don't work long.

    That way, people can ask what contributions creationism make to society.
     
  16. gaara4158

    gaara4158 I prefer you trust your reason.

    +530
    Humanist
    Single
    US-Democrat
    An even more interesting tangent: how on earth could someone incorporate a belief in creationism into their job as a coder?
     
  17. Blayz

    Blayz Well-Known Member

    +212
    Atheist
    Married
    Nope, just code.

    You say alot of things unsupported by any evidence, we will just add this to the list.

    Also an interesting question.
     
  18. Split Rock

    Split Rock Conflation of Blathers

    +593
    Agnostic
    Single
    Here is a Pub Med search I just did on "evolution" : Results: 1 to 20 of 284917 evolution - PubMed result Yes, that's right... 284,917 peer reviewed papers on evolution. These papers show how researchers use the scientific method to test the theory of evolution. How many of these papers on evolution have you read? I will guess NONE. Spreading falsehoods is a Sin. Shame on you. :preach:
     
  19. Split Rock

    Split Rock Conflation of Blathers

    +593
    Agnostic
    Single
    LOL! Good one, Ginger. You've got a bunch of 'em fooled that you're for real. ;)
     
  20. AV1611VET

    AV1611VET SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE Supporter

    +37,254
    Baptist
    Married
    How many of them were named, Jesus?
     
Loading...