Zimmerman Prosecutor Files Gag Order Against Defense

[Panzerkamfwagen]

Except we have only the testimony of the shooter to corroberate that. Any rebuttal... oh, darn. he's dead.

Yup. Zimmerman had no injuries at all.

According to some of the motions filed by the defense, the prosecution has withheld exculpatory evidence including sketches prepared by witnesses. So they've violated Zimmeran's due process rights.

again, there is no evidence of zimmerman being jumped, or having his head bashed. None. And no, there isn't a law about staying in the car. the POINT is, Zimmerman forced confrontation, he was armed, Trayvon was not. That is cold hard fact.

If this EMT report is accurate, that is not true. and Zimmerman received injuries.

From Dee Dee's testimony

BDLR: OK, and then what happened?

Dee Dee: And then…he say he lost him.

BDLR: He lost..like…the man?

Dee Dee: Yeah.

no, he wouldn't. Chasing down a guy with a gun, because he's suspiciously black, is not a legal right.

What illegal activity did George Zimmerman engage in?

 

[Uphill Battle]

Yup. Zimmerman had no injuries at all.

Video: Trayvon Martin shooting: CCTV shows George Zimmerman not injured - Telegraph


Snipped. The fact is, even if Zimmerman DID have injuries, it doesn't change a thing. following someone with a gun is actually not protected under the "stand your ground" laws. Forcing confrontation, is not protected.

What illegal activity did George Zimmerman engage in?

Murder, so it seems.

 

[MachZer0]

You do realize how the indictment process works, I hope.

In this case, it worked like a circus

Except we have only the testimony of the shooter to corroberate that. Any rebuttal... oh, darn. he's dead.

And the testimony of an eyewitness who corroborated Zimmerman's story

again, there is no evidence of zimmerman being jumped, or having his head bashed. None. And no, there isn't a law about staying in the car. the POINT is,

Except of course for Zimmermans's broken nose, gashed head and other physical injuries consistent with the account he reported

Zimmerman forced confrontation, he was armed, Trayvon was not. That is cold hard fact.

Zimmerman was LEGALLY armed and the cold hard fact that he forced a confrontation is pure speculation on your part, nothing more

Trayvon Martin killing: witness says he saw Zimmerman walk away uninjured | World news | guardian.co.uk

I'm sure that comes as a surprise to the paramedics who treated him at the scene, the neighbor who photographed his injuries at the scene, the police who reported his injuries at the scene and the doctor who treated him the following day.

no, he wouldn't. Chasing down a guy with a gun, because he's suspiciously black, is not a legal right.

More speculation. By the way, here in America, speculation isn't part of our legal prosecution process.

you have a very strange and twisted sense of justice, in my opinion.

Oh the irony. Black guy jumps white guy. White guy defends self. Blavk guy tries to kill white guy. White guy defends self by shooting black guy. White guy bad. THAT is an indefensible sense of justice

 

[Uphill Battle]

In this case, it worked like a circus

you avoided the question.

And the testimony of an eyewitness who corroborated Zimmerman's story

and the testimony of eyewitnesses that paint it as a lie.

Except of course for Zimmermans's broken nose, gashed head and other physical injuries consistent with the account he reported

except for the complete lack of that visible evidence in the video already posted.

Zimmerman was LEGALLY armed and the cold hard fact that he forced a confrontation is pure speculation on your part, nothing more
I'm sure that comes as a surprise to the paramedics who treated him at the scene, the neighbor who photographed his injuries at the scene, the police who reported his injuries at the scene and the doctor who treated him the following day.

mmmhmm.

More speculation. By the way, here in America, speculation isn't part of our legal prosecution process.

It's the entirety of the American leagal process.

Oh the irony. Black guy jumps white guy. White guy defends self. Blavk guy tries to kill white guy. White guy defends self by shooting black guy. White guy bad. THAT is an indefensible sense of justice

funny. The trial hasn't happened, and you are already giving a verdict of not guilty.

funny that you are condemning me for holding the equal and opposite position.

 

[MachZer0]

you avoided the question.

and the testimony of eyewitnesses that paint it as a lie.

except for the complete lack of that visible evidence in the video already posted.

mmmhmm.

It's the entirety of the American leagal process.


funny. The trial hasn't happened, and you are already giving a verdict of not guilty.

funny that you are condemning me for holding the equal and opposite position.

Just as the police noted previously, all the physical evidence corroborated Zimmerman's account. There is not one shred of evidence that Zimmerman committed a crime.

 

[Uphill Battle]

Just as the police noted previously, all the physical evidence corroborated Zimmerman's account. There is not one shred of evidence that Zimmerman committed a crime.

which is why he was indicted.

 

[MachZer0]

which is why he was indicted.

I view his indictment as political. Note that the legal brief ti indict him cited not one piece of actual evidence against him.

 

[Gxg (G²)]

Video: Trayvon Martin shooting: CCTV shows George Zimmerman not injured - Telegraph


Snipped. The fact is, even if Zimmerman DID have injuries, it doesn't change a thing. following someone with a gun is actually not protected under the "stand your ground" laws. Forcing confrontation, is not protected.
.

The difference between reacting due to forcing a fight and defending onself when someone comes after them.