Dave Ellis
Contributor
- Dec 27, 2011
- 8,933
- 821
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
What's wrong with creating a world with the possibility of suffering, if you create a place where the suffering dissipates? They cancel (at worst (liberate, at best))?
Is your problem that when you think of Heaven, the suffering does not cease immediately?
Or am I misreading you?
Because the later dissipation of suffering does not "cancel out" the original act of suffering.
An omnibenevolent being can not logically create a place where people will needlessly suffer. The very idea is contradictory.
Upvote
0