ricg
Regular Member
I think my reasons are similar to those of Cal. Josh. The essential difference is that the Lutheran Church is Christ-referential. While it does not see itself as such, the institutional pillars of the RC Church are self-referential. This plays out in hundreds of ways, but as pointed above, the most important is in the doctrine of justification.
But we've had an example on this very thread, where our RC poster posed the question of how one determines the canon of Scripture. His implied answer: check with the appropriate institutional RC church authority. Follow that reasoning to its logical conclusion: the church (meaning appropriate RC authority -- ultimately the pope) determines what is Scripture, i.e., God's Word, and therefore has the exclusive right interpret God's Word in a manner binding on all. Thus, the pope is the master of God's Word, rather than God's Word being master of the pope.
The Lutheran Confessions do not define the canon of Scripture. Scripture is authoritative because it is God's Word, not because of any action by a church figure or institution.
But we've had an example on this very thread, where our RC poster posed the question of how one determines the canon of Scripture. His implied answer: check with the appropriate institutional RC church authority. Follow that reasoning to its logical conclusion: the church (meaning appropriate RC authority -- ultimately the pope) determines what is Scripture, i.e., God's Word, and therefore has the exclusive right interpret God's Word in a manner binding on all. Thus, the pope is the master of God's Word, rather than God's Word being master of the pope.
The Lutheran Confessions do not define the canon of Scripture. Scripture is authoritative because it is God's Word, not because of any action by a church figure or institution.
Upvote
0