Let's call it what it really is. When people's desires were based on mostly visual attractiveness, it used to be called superficiality. Somewhere along the line, people started to justify superficialness under the guise of being visual. I'm frankly tired of it. Scriptures tell a man not to pick a mate based on physical beauty. They also tell a man to be enraptured sexually with his wife when they are both old. So, how does this happen and what does this mean? If God chose your mate for you, He gives you the desire for your mate, and it is not something that goes away if they gain weight, or wrinkles.
Um,....no, not in this OP, not at all. See this is another topic that cannot be discussed rationally. BEFORE you ever met your spouse, MOST people saw their spouse. The seeing was the first exposure. I dont care if there are some here that will say "oh not me, we met in the dark"...or whatever...most people SAW before they MET.
The OP makes a great point when he refutes the so predictable line about "beauty is more than skin deep". Readers seem to have a hard time understanding that no one is saying that looks are EVERYTHING, indeed they arent even assigning a relative value to looks, the OP is simply saying that, pick you own prference, there is SOME level of importance to it.
Other predictable misunderstandings is the old "so, as she ages and you age and you both add some weight you no longer find each other attractive"
Another straw man....that was not the point EITHER. In fact any extreme example you can cook up, he/she is wheelchair bound, he/she has a disease, whatever is irrelevant, OP is NOT speaking about those situations, NOR did he say a single word about controlling , divorcing, no longer loving, or any kind of consequence whatesoever. Posters make that stuff up!
The perfect analogy is, how about if your husband stopped ALL oral hygiene. After a few months of that, things are gonna be "rotten". (please dont react like I suspect some are itchin to, he IS talking about WILLFUL behavior, not the natural aging and weight gain or any other not willful event, so willful lack of oral hygiene is perfect analogy)
So hubby has teeth falling out and breath that killed the cat. You think MAYBE you'd be a little, oh "PUT OFF" by that? OF COURSE you would. And you wouldnt be wrong to be.
This usually lines up along gender lines, and to be honest this defense that NO MATTER WHAT he ought to love and cherish her....well thats true...EXCEPT he said not a word about NOT loving and cherishing her.
Like the rotten teeth, he can have displeasure with the EFFECT, and STILL be madly deeply in love. To insist that a marriage is a license to let oneself go is painfully selfish to be honest. Of course not everyone can go to gym, have a six pack etc thats also not waht he is saying.
He is saying to BE REASONABLE....nothing more. If you gain 5 pounds, 10 pounds per decade, whatever, THATS NORMAL, and only obsessives can really keep that off, or folks blessed w/ rocket metabolisms.....but he isnt suggesting men dump women when they add weight or anything cruel.
On another page I had listed 2 topics that cannot be discussed rationally. I will add weight to that list and make it 3 things.