- Dec 25, 2003
- 42,058
- 16,811
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
So what is happening here is that I list frauds.....in the evolutionary world and you quickly change the subject....address the frauds and quit running.
This is kind of ironic as your "list of frauds" has been addressed at least once by Split Rock and a second time by myself, and yet you chose, this morning, to address neither of the refutations of your "claims", but instead to bleet, blather and change the subject.
Well one thing leads to another....and I find it all interesting. What I can't read about entropy? LOL
From what I have read...entropy shoots evolution dead in the water.
Let me guess. What you've been reading are Creationist straw men of 2LoT and entropy so of course it would seem that way. Have you given a moments notice to either the actual science behind 2LoT or entropy or rebuttals to Creationist straw man claims about them?
"The universe is dying from heat loss but according to entropy or the second law of thermodynamics everything runs from order to disorder and from complexity to decay. Evolution directly contradicts this law....in that.. it describes a universe in which things run from utter chaos to complexity and
order. In evolution atoms allegedly self-produce amino acids, amino acids auto-organize amoebas, amoebas turn into apes and apes evolve into astronauts." The Farce of Evolution, by Hank Hanegraaff page 85.
Hank Hanegraff is an idiot. His understanding of physics and biology make my laymans understanding of them appear professorial. I mean the last quoted sentence alone is such a farce, any person with even a passing acquaintence with biology would laugh at his parody... except it's not a parody.
The conditions that hold true in the universe today prevent any possiblity of matter springing out of nothing...
Ooops, there you go with the "out of nothing" claim again, which just shows you don't know anything about the Big Bang Theory.
.so the universe could not have eternally existed. This hypothesis is killed by the law of entropy...which predicts that a universe that has eternally existed would have died out billions of years ago...by heat loss.
Wow, I thought Hank Hanegraff didn't know what he was talking about.
So when you say this has nothing to do with evolution and the whole scheme of things...you are wrong. It just tossed out one theory that evolutionists have about the possiblities of how everything came to be.
See the post I made about a half hour ago. God started everything in motion and physics led to chemistry, chemistry led to life, life evolved. Now what? And since you claim to be arguing against evolution or "Darwinism" or whatever, what does it matter how the universe came to be or how life started? Evoultion only addresses extant life and what happens to it.
Can you actually argue against evolution or would you rather stick to your God of the Gaps tactic and myopically focus on Cosmology and abiogenesis and muck about with atheists?
Just a question for ya. Do you think there are any creation scientists on earth? Are they out to lunch too? I think that you so hate the idea of God that you will believe anything and I mean anything......like something came from nothing.
There are scientists who are Creationists, but not because of the science. There are scientists who are creationists and not only accept evolution, they argue in favor of it like Francis Collins, Kenneth Miller, Mary Schweitzer, Robert Bakker, and a bunch of people who post to Christianforums like sfs, KerrMetric, lucaspa, and several others I'm embarrassed for forgetting now.
Upvote
0