But we do not elect by popular vote.
This election was indeed very close, not a lot different from the Gore vs. Bush election.
A change in the outcome of only a couple of states where the vote was close would put this year's election into the House of Representatives to decide.
You mean the when the republican congress called for a republican lead DOJ to appoint a republican special prosecutor? That Democratic party?
Yes we will be rejoicing in the streets when the Harris-Biden administration doubles our taxes to pay for the billions we sent to Muslim countries instead of providing for our citizens. Gender studies in a Muslim country is certainly good for US citizens out of work due to the pandemic.Indeed, we elect by electoral vote, state by state... which ultimately was also decidedly in favor of Joe Biden.
306-232 is hardly what any reasonable person would call "indeed very close."
the Bush/Gore election of 2000, OTOH, was a 271-266 close call.
The facts do not support your opinion.
And Donald has tried -- desperately -- to change the outcomes in several states.
He has failed -- hilariously -- in all of his attempts.
When the votes are counted in the Senate, a number of GOP congresspeople, circling over Donald's base like buzzards over a sick gazelle, will attempt to postpone the inevitable. In the spirit of Donald, they, too, will fail.
Yes we will be rejoicing in the streets when the Harris-Biden administration doubles our taxes to pay for the billions we sent to Muslim countries instead of providing for our citizens. Gender studies in a Muslim country is certainly good for US citizens out of work due to the pandemic.
de·flec·tion /dəˈflekSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: deflection; plural noun: deflections; noun: deflexion; plural noun: deflexions
the action or process of deflecting or being deflected.
Yes we will be rejoicing in the streets when the Harris-Biden administration doubles our taxes to pay for the billions we sent to Muslim countries instead of providing for our citizens. Gender studies in a Muslim country is certainly good for US citizens out of work due to the pandemic.
But we do not elect by popular vote.
This election was indeed very close, not a lot different from the Gore vs. Bush election.
A change in the outcome of only a couple of states where the vote was close would put this
year's election into the House of Representatives to decide.
Yes we will be rejoicing in the streets when the Harris-Biden administration doubles our taxes to pay for the billions we sent to Muslim countries instead of providing for our citizens. Gender studies in a Muslim country is certainly good for US citizens out of work due to the pandemic.
Well, of course it DOES matter when the other fellow has tried to argue that winning the popular vote is what counts.It *does not matter* because Trump also lost the electoral college....
Because the election laws were changed big time in order to create the slim margin by which Biden (apparently) won. Because vote fraud, which Democratic leaders until recently insisted never happened at all, anywhere, at any time, was so much in evidence. And most of all because a change of only a few thousand votes in two or three states would have changed the outcome...Somehow in your mind (and Trump's) an even *bigger* state by state win by Biden in 2020 is "very close"? How?
Accurate math can help here. Changing the outcome of only two of the states in question would reduce Biden's Electoral College total to 270.Trump lost the electoral college by 74 electoral college votes, *way* more than the the Bush/Gore race that ended with Bush getting 271 (bare minimum required to win) to Gore's 267. That's a difference of just *4* electoral college votes, not 74! It's almost 20 times the margin of the 2000 election.
Accurate math can help here. Changing the outcome of only two of the states in question would reduce Biden's Electoral College total to 270.
Well, of course it DOES matter when the other fellow has tried to argue that winning the popular vote is what counts.
Because the election laws were changed big time in order to create the slim margin by which Biden (apparently) won.
Because vote fraud, ....
which Democratic leaders until recently insisted never happened at all, anywhere, at any time, was so much in evidence. And most of all because a change of only a few thousand votes in two or three states would have changed the outcome...
it was very close.
Accurate math can help here. Changing the outcome of only two of the states in question would reduce Biden's Electoral College total to 270.
Go back and reread my post. That's not what I argued.
*that it was closeWell, the same* applies to this election.
No it doesn't!
Trump lost the popular vote (again) by more than 7 million votes. It wasn't even close.
But we do not elect by popular vote. This election was indeed very close, not a lot different from the Gore vs. Bush election.
Well, of course it DOES matter when the other fellow has tried to argue that winning the popular vote is what counts.
Here's the recap--
*that it was close
Why didn't answer this question?
No judge anywhere has ruled in Trump's favor. Why do you figure that might be, particularly since half of them were likely to be Republicans?