• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What think ye of Ezekiel's Temple?

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Last edited:
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟334,397.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I have done it. The new Temple is amply prophesied OT and NT = 2Thessalonians 2:4, Revelation 11:1-2

Keras, I really don't know how to be much clearer, but 2 thessalonians and revelation 11 are not daniel 9. I have repeatedly asked you to provide scripture where the temple is rebuilt a 2nd time, IN DANIEL 9, to support that the temple in daniel 9:26 is different from daniel 9:27. It appears you can not.

for arguments sake, let's say 2 thessalonians is about the physical earthly temple. Contextually, it would be about the temple that existed in the day that paul wrote to the thessalonian church. There is no talk about the destruction of that current temple followed by 2000+ years and then the '3rd' temple rebuilt for the man of lawlessness to sit in.

2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who NOW restrains it will do so until he is out of the way.

The disciples clearly taught that they were living at the end of the ages (1 corinthians 10:11), in the last days (Acts 2:16-17), and that it was the last hour (1 John 2:18). If this is the case, and the temple in thessalonians was a physical temple, it can be easily reasoned that it was the temple that existed in Paul's day in Jerusalem, and not a '3rd' temple 2000+ years later.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0

Douggg

anytime rapture, non-dispensationalist, futurist
May 28, 2009
29,995
3,563
Non-dispensationalist
✟414,417.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The disciples clearly taught that they were living at the end of the ages (1 corinthians 10:11), in the last days (Acts 2:16-17), and that it was the last hour (1 John 2:18)
Jesus had referred to Daniel the prophet regarding the abomination of desolation. Which is recorded in Daniel 12.

4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

Clearly this generation, claninja.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Depends when the Covenant actually commences.

That would be at Calvary.

Joh 19:30 So when Jesus had received the sour wine, He said, "It is finished!" And bowing His head, He gave up His spirit.




Jer_31:31 "Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—

Mat_26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
Mar_14:24 And He said to them, "This is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many.

Luk_22:20 Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you.

1Co_11:25 In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me."

2Co_3:6 who also made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life.

Heb_8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—

Heb_8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

Heb_9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.

Heb_12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.

.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟334,397.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus had referred to Daniel the prophet regarding the abomination of desolation. Which is recorded in Daniel 12.

4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

Clearly this generation, claninja.

Correct, the disciples generation, as they believed and taught that they were living at the end of the ages (1 corinthians 10:11), in the last days (Acts 2:16-17), and that it was the last hour (1 John 2:18). Why? because Jesus had told them.

Matthew 24:15 “So when YOU see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’
Matthew 24:34 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.

Just as Jesus suffered and was rejected under the disciples' generation
Luke 17:25 But first He must suffer many things and be rejected by this generation.

And just as the disciples' generation would suffer for all the righteous blood shed:
Matthew 23:35-36 And so upon you will come all the righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. 36Truly I tell you, all this will come on this generation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

ebedmelech

My dog Micah in the pic
Site Supporter
Jul 3, 2012
9,002
680
✟212,364.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I would ask, how were all of those things not fulfilled in Christ?
In fact they were. It is a difficult passage until one allows scripture to interpret it...and then it becomes clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0

ebedmelech

My dog Micah in the pic
Site Supporter
Jul 3, 2012
9,002
680
✟212,364.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
(continued from post #373)

This is also stated in Romans 9, where we read:

“25 As He says also in Hosea: ‘I will call them My people, who were not My people, And her beloved, who was not beloved.’ ‘26 And it shall come to pass in the place where it was said to them, “You are not My people,” There they shall be called sons of the living God.’ ” (Romans 9:25-26)

In the very place “where it was said to them, ‘You are not My people,’ There they shall be called sons of the living God.” That is the context given by the Holy Spirit himself, speaking through the Apostle Paul, for the words “I will call them My people, who were not My people, And her beloved, who was not beloved.”

Now we are not told exactly where Hosea was standing when God told him, “Call his name Lo-Ammi, For you are not My people, And I will not be your God.” (Hosea 1:9) But as he was a prophet of Judah, this would have been said somewhere in Judea, the country now called Israel. So here, in Romans 9:25, which is a quotation from Hosea 1:10, the Holy Spirit clearly said that there was a day coming when, within the physical borders of the modern nation of Israel, the people of Israel “shall be called sons of the living God.”

But this brings us back to the beginnings of this ninth chapter of Romans, where we read:

“1 I tell the truth in Christ, I am not lying, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Spirit, 2 that I have great sorrow and continual grief in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my countrymen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom pertain the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service of God, and the promises; 5 of whom are the fathers and from whom, according to the flesh, Christ came, who is over all, the eternally blessed God. Amen.” (Romans 9:1-5)
We noticed earlier that this passage clearly defines the people under discussion as Paul’s “brethren,” his “countrymen according to the flesh, who are Israelites.” Thus, there can be zero question that the people group under discussion is the individuals that made up the fleshly nation of Israel. There is absolutely no way this can be rationally “spiritualized” to mean “the church.” Yet this same people group remains the subject throughout these entire three chapters, for we read of them again in chapter eleven, that, “Concerning the gospel they are enemies for your sake, but concerning the election they are beloved for the sake of the fathers.” (Romans 11:28)

So this entire three chapter section (Romans 9-11) is about the fleshly nation of Israel, who were “enemies” “concerning the gospel.” That is, the people under discussion had not accepted the gospel, and were on their way to a lost eternity. But, even though tthey were “enemies,” yet they were still “beloved for the sake of the fathers.” And then comes a stunning declaration, which is the death forever for the claim that god has permanently rejected Israel. “For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.” (Romans 11:29)

We need to notice that the context of this declaration that “the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable” is the fact that Paul’s “brethren,” his “countrymen according to the flesh, who are Israelites,” are “enemies” “concerning the gospel.” Yet they “are beloved for the sake of the fathers.”

We are not only explicitly told of the temporary nature of Israel’s rejection, we are also told the reason for this. And again, the words are too plain to misunderstand, unless they are approached by a prejudiced mind. God did not reject Israel in condemnation, but to provoke them to jealousy. This is not a tactic of someone who has stopped loving someone and turned to another. It is a tactic of someone who is still in love, and who is working to win back the love of whoever had spurned their love. So we read:

“19 But I say, did Israel not know? First Moses says: ‘I will provoke you to jealousy by those who are not a nation, I will move you to anger by a foolish nation.’ ” (Romans 10:19)

And again we read:

“11 I say then, have they stumbled that they should fall? Certainly not! But through their fall, to provoke them to jealousy, salvation has come to the Gentiles. 12 Now if their fall is riches for the world, and their failure riches for the Gentiles, how much more their fullness! 13 For I speak to you Gentiles; inasmuch as I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry, 14 if by any means I may provoke to jealousy those who are my flesh and save some of them. 15 For if their being cast away is the reconciling of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?” (Romans 11:11-15)

So God has not only clearly told us that the reason for Israel’s rejection is only to woo them back to himself. He has just as clearly told us that when he has accomplished that purpose, the result of Israel’s restoration will not mean a loss of blessing to the gentiles, but rather, as it were, a very revival of “life from the dead.”

And we need to notice that this eventual restoration of Israel is not stated here as a new revelation, but rather referred to as a well established fact. The Holy Spirit does not say, “if they are revived, it will be life from the dead,” but “what will their acceptance be but life from the dead.” That is, the Christian’s prior knowledge of this acceptance is simply assumed in this scripture.

And why would this knowledge of Israel’s eventual acceptance be simply assumed here? Because it had already been stated, and explicitly stated, in too many places to count.

A great many of these explicit statements that God will indeed accomplish this purpose of winning back their hearts are in the Old Testament. So they are outside of the subject matter of this article. But concerning these very many Old Testament statements about this, we need to notice what Jesus said concerning the rich man and Lazarus:

“29Abraham said to him, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’ 30 And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’ 31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.’ ” (Luke 16:29-31)

So the scriptures warn us that we are responsible to heed the words of “Moses and the prophets.” And in the New Testament, the Holy Spirit clearly refers to these Old Testament prophecies, saying, “19 Repent therefore and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, so that times of refreshing may come from the presence of the Lord, 20 and that He may send Jesus Christ, who was preached to you before, 21 whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.” (Acts 3:19-21)

This future period is here called two things. It is first called “times of refreshing” and then called “the times of restoration of all things.” The Greek word here translated “of refreshing” is “anapsuxeos,” (word number 403 in Strong’s Greek Dictionary,) which properly means a “recovery of breath,” and thus figuratively means “revival.” And the Greek word translated “of restoration” is “apokatastaseos,” (word number 605 in Strong’s Greek Dictionary,) which means “reconstitution.” What we need to realize from this, is that neither of these words means, or even implies, a time of judgment. Both of these words mean a restoration, not a time of destruction. That is, the Holy Spirit, here quoting Peter through Luke, is specifically saying that there is a time coming when all things will be restored, and then explicitly says that this is the time of “which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began.”

So here we have a NEW TESTAMENT statement, made after the new covenant was ALREADY in force, that the things “which God has spoken by the mouth of all His holy prophets since the world began” are still in the future, and will still happen. That is, these MANY promises still apply. These are the promises which, as we previously saw in Romans 9:3-4, still “pertain” to Paul’s “brethren,” his “countrymen according to the flesh, who are Israelites.”

And finally, there is one more New Testament scripture that mentions this future restoration of Israel.
“27Then Peter answered and said to Him, ‘See, we have left all and followed You. Therefore what shall we have?’ 28So Jesus said to them, ‘Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.’ ” (Matthew 19:27-28)

The Greek word here translated “regeneration” is “paliggenesia.” (word number 3824 in Strong’s Greek Dictionary) In the Greek this is a compound word made by connecting the Greek word “palin,” (word number 3825 in Strong’s Greek Dictionary,) which means “once more,” and the Greek word “genesis,” (word number1078 in Strong’s Greek Dictionary,) which means “nativity,” or “birth.” So once again, this word clearly speaks of a time of restoration, not a time of destruction. But in this time the twelve Apostles “will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.” Thus we clearly read, in the New Testament, of a future rebirth, in which the twelve apostles will judge “the twelve tribes of Israel.” Not just Judah, but all twelve tribes, just as repeatedly promised in the Old Testament.

So in conclusion, there is simply no rational escape from the fact that, not just the Old Testament, but also the New Testament, clearly and repeatedly states that there is a time coming in the future, in which the ancient nation of Israel will be restored.
Biblewriter you have a loyalty to your theology over scripture. The 144,000 of Revelation represent every believer in Christ...Jew or Gentile. It's simply a shame that you can't see that.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
15,118
2,595
84
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟352,458.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Keras, I really don't know how to be much clearer, but 2 thessalonians and revelation 11 are not daniel 9. I have repeatedly asked you to provide scripture where the temple is rebuilt a 2nd time, IN DANIEL 9, to support that the temple in daniel 9:26 is different from daniel 9:27.
You have obviously made up your mind, you don't want a new Temple; even if God does!

I see the two different Temples in Daniel 9:26-27. The first one is destroyed and the second one fits the last days 'abomination of desolation' that Jesus prophesied. Matthew 24:15
2 Thessalonians 2:4: Paul's "naos" spiritual temple
Revelation 11:1-2: John's "naos" spiritual temple
Strongs Greek Dict; 3485 naos; from prime 'naio'; to dwell. A shrine, a temple. Compare 2411
2411 hieron; a sacred place, the precinct's of the Temple.
Where do you get 'spiritual Temple'?
Anyway its rubbish to spiritualize any scripture that can and from other prophesies; WILL be literally fulfilled.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
15,118
2,595
84
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟352,458.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
That would be at Calvary.
Why then, has God's Covenant promises remained unfulfilled? Hebrews 8:10-12 has simply not happened yet.
I have explained why; they await our occupying all of the holy Land. Isaiah 62:1-5
THEN, the Lord will pour out His blessings on His faithful People. Isaiah 66:12-14, Ezekiel 34:11-16,+
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,020
✟843,047.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Strongs Greek Dict; 3485 naos; from prime 'naio'; to dwell. A shrine, a temple. Compare 2411
2411 hieron; a sacred place, the precinct's of the Temple.
Where do you get 'spiritual Temple'?
Anyway its rubbish to spiritualize any scripture that can and from other prophesies; WILL be literally fulfilled.
From everywhere that Paul and John use "naos".

Check 'em out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why then, has God's Covenant promises remained unfulfilled? Hebrews 8:10-12 has simply not happened yet.

You have to cut Hebrews 7:12, and Hebrews 8:6, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and 2 Corinthians 3:6-8 out of your Bible to make your statement above work.

Heb 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
(The verse above was written in the present tense during the first century.)


.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jgr
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
15,118
2,595
84
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟352,458.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
From everywhere that Paul and John use "naos".
But that Greek word doesn't mean a spiritual Temple. Maybe it could, but the context should decide whether it refers to a spiritual or a physical Temple.
2 Thessalonians 2:4 and Revelation 11:1-2, both clearly describe an actual Temple; one that the Gentiles will trample for 42 months and the Anti-Christ will desecrate by sitting in it.
Heb 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
(The verse above was written in the present tense during the first century.)
Hebrews 8:6 But in fact the Ministry Jesus has been given is superior to theirs, [Moses'] for He is the Mediator of a better Covenant, established on better Promises. REBible
I note that 'Now' is in the original Greek, but 'was' is not.
The 'Now' of your version does refer to the time after Jesus, but the 'was' is added in by the translators, so a doctrine cannot be established on it.

You haven't bothered to address Hebrews 8:10-12 as they mess up your premise of a Christian believer now being in the full New Covenant. Its so obvious that we have not yet received the pardon for all our sins. The Promise of that, but not the reality, as we continue to live in this wicked world.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟554,225.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
What you have said is absolutely true. But that is because you have interpreted it. You understand spiritual life and spiritual death, you understand the concept of the resurrection.

To someone who does not know those things, at face value it literally reads you will not die if you believe in jesus.

It does not say believers will sleep and live again, as you are interpreting it to mean.
No, taking these words at face value included realizing God's perspective on them.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟916,165.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But that Greek word doesn't mean a spiritual Temple. Maybe it could, but the context should decide whether it refers to a spiritual or a physical Temple.
2 Thessalonians 2:4 and Revelation 11:1-2, both clearly describe an actual Temple; one that the Gentiles will trample for 42 months and the Anti-Christ will desecrate by sitting in it.

Hebrews 8:6 But in fact the Ministry Jesus has been given is superior to theirs, [Moses'] for He is the Mediator of a better Covenant, established on better Promises. REBible
I note that 'Now' is in the original Greek, but 'was' is not.
The 'Now' of your version does refer to the time after Jesus, but the 'was' is added in by the translators, so a doctrine cannot be established on it.

You haven't bothered to address Hebrews 8:10-12 as they mess up your premise of a Christian believer now being in the full New Covenant. Its so obvious that we have not yet received the pardon for all our sins. The Promise of that, but not the reality, as we continue to live in this wicked world.

I did not address Hebrews 8:10-12 by itself, because you have ripped those two verses out of their context to make your doctrine work.

The author of the Book of Hebrews quotes the promise of the New Covenant found in Jeremiah 31:31-34, starting in verse 8 below, instead of verse 10.
He quotes it word-for-word, as indicated by the uppercase letters in the NKJV.

The verse below explains why those now in the New Covenant do not need a human teacher.


Joh 14:26 But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.

If you are in the New Covenant, the Spirit of God which dwells inside of you (1 Corinthians 3:16) is attempting to teach you something by our interaction here.



Heb 8:6 But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, inasmuch as He is also Mediator of a better covenant, which was established on better promises.
Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.
Heb 8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH—
Heb 8:9 NOT ACCORDING TO THE COVENANT THAT I MADE WITH THEIR FATHERS IN THE DAY WHEN I TOOK THEM BY THE HAND TO LEAD THEM OUT OF THE LAND OF EGYPT; BECAUSE THEY DID NOT CONTINUE IN MY COVENANT, AND I DISREGARDED THEM, SAYS THE LORD.
Heb 8:10 FOR THIS IS THE COVENANT THAT I WILL MAKE WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AFTER THOSE DAYS, SAYS THE LORD: I WILL PUT MY LAWS IN THEIR MIND AND WRITE THEM ON THEIR HEARTS; AND I WILL BE THEIR GOD, AND THEY SHALL BE MY PEOPLE.
Heb 8:11 NONE OF THEM SHALL TEACH HIS NEIGHBOR, AND NONE HIS BROTHER, SAYING, 'KNOW THE LORD,' FOR ALL SHALL KNOW ME, FROM THE LEAST OF THEM TO THE GREATEST OF THEM.
Heb 8:12 FOR I WILL BE MERCIFUL TO THEIR UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, AND THEIR SINS AND THEIR LAWLESS DEEDS I WILL REMEMBER NO MORE."
Heb 8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.

Christ fulfilled the New Covenant at Calvary.

He said the New Covenant would be fulfilled by His blood when He offered the wine at the Last Supper.

Mat 26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.



If you think your sin debt has not been fulfilled yet, you need to read the New Testament again.


.
 
Upvote 0

Davy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 25, 2017
4,861
1,022
USA
✟291,297.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Again you are taking a verse out of context and putting it into the future when it has long past history. The generation was the generation that saw the Roman armies surrounding Jerusalem, the generation that all the woes in Matthew 23 came on. Those who filled up the measures of their fathers, by cucfying their Messiah.

That's not what our Lord Jesus said. He connected the generation that would see those things with the event of His 2nd coming, and that event is... still future to us today.

Likewise in 2 Thess.2, Apostle Paul revealed the Antichrist and apostasy must occur prior to Christ's coming and gathering of His Church, and that has not happened yet either. Those on your theory definitely are guilty of taking both Jesus and Paul out of context in those Scriptures, just so they can keep their own tradition of men.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟334,397.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You haven't bothered to address Hebrews 8:10-12 as they mess up your premise of a Christian believer now being in the full New Covenant.

Why did God say he would establish a new covenant?

For he finds fault with them when he says:
Hebrews 8:7 Bible Gateway passage: Hebrews 8:7-8 - English Standard Version


So according to you, the new covenant is not here yet?

I note that 'Now' is in the original Greek, but 'was' is not.
The 'Now' of your version does refer to the time after Jesus, but the 'was' is added in by the translators, so a doctrine cannot be established on it.

The Greek word literally means ‘has been enacted.’ It is past tense according to the author of Hebrews.

It literally states: Christ IS (present tense) the mediator of a better covenant, which on better promises HAS BEEN ENACTED (past tense)

Its so obvious that we have not yet received the pardon for all our sins

Scripture literally disagrees with you:

having blotted out the handwriting in the ordinances that is against us, that was contrary to us, and he hath taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross;
Colossians 2:14 - Bible Gateway passage: Colossians 2:14 - Young's Literal Translation

since it had behoved him many times to suffer from the foundation of the world, but now once, at the full end of the ages, for putting away of sin through his sacrifice, he hath been manifested;
Hebrews 9:26 - Bible Gateway passage: Hebrews 9:26 - Young's Literal Translation
 
Upvote 0

seventysevens

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2017
3,207
844
USA
✟38,043.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
2 Thessalonians 2:7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only he who NOW restrains it will do so until he is out of the way.
The mystery of lawlessness is already at work. refers to the satanic spirit as in the Prince of the air is at work , the powers of principalities - that conniving spirit that cons people into committing sinful acts .

Only he who NOW restrains it will do so until he is out of the way. ...... refers to those whose presence hold back the total and complete ruthlessness that will take place after he is taken out of the way - the he is STILL restraining as the spiritual sense of lawlessness becomes manifested into the Physical literal realm as the Man of Lawlessness and he will convince people everywhere that he IS God - this is way far more than just some random guy who says that he is God but he is SENT by GOD - No other man in history of earth has been sent by God that will fulfill this future role

You need to include more of the context of what is being revealed
2thes2
8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming.

9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie,

simply said is that the spirit of satanic power is at work but will become manifest in a physical manner through a Man that God is sending so that the strong delusion of the lie that that Man God is sending will be believed that is truly is the true messiah so that those who refuse to repent of their wickedness will follow the lie that God has sent - and it will be the real King Messiah Jesus that will destroy that false king that the people have followed - when THAT happens Jesus will have returned to earth

Anytime you take some verses from a chapter and disregard the relevant connecting scriptures - you will end up with a misunderstanding
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,725
2,194
indiana
✟334,397.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The mystery of lawlessness is already at work. refers to the satanic spirit as in the Prince of the air is at work , the powers of principalities - that conniving spirit that cons people into committing sinful acts .


2 thessalonians 2:6 And you know what is restraining HIM NOW so that HE may be revealed in HIS time.

2 thessalonians 2:7 the mystery of lawlessness is already at work. Only HE who NOW restrains it will do so until HE is out of the way.


Only he who NOW restrains it will do so until he is out of the way. ...... refers to those whose presence hold back the total and complete ruthlessness that will take place after he is taken out of the way - the he is STILL restraining as the spiritual sense of lawlessness becomes manifested into the Physical literal realm as the Man of Lawlessness and he will convince people everywhere that he IS God - this is way far more than just some random guy who says that he is God but he is SENT by GOD - No other man in history of earth has been sent by God that will fulfill this future role

Scripture does not say who the restrainer was, only that it was a he. Scripture does not say who the man of lawlessness was, only that it was a man.

So there was a man, currently during the time of paul, that was restraining the man of lawlessness from setting himself up in the temple. Why would Paul's audience assume that this was about a temple 2000+ years later and not the one that was currently standing in their time? Why didn't paul clarify that it was about a temple 2000+ years later and not the one that was standing in their day?

You need to include more of the context of what is being revealed
2thes2
8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming.
Anytime you take some verses from a chapter and disregard the relevant connecting scriptures - you will end up with a misunderstanding

I mean, I view scripture through a 'preterist' lens, so I agree that the man of lawlessness was destroyed at the coming of Christ when Jerusalem and temple were destoryed.
 
Upvote 0