Messiah was to come after the 62 weeks, which were to be after the 7 weeks. (69 weeks total) After that, the city and the sanctuary (which is the temple) were to be destroyed. (verse 26) But then verse 27 says that one more week was to ensue. And in the middle of that week. "He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering." But such sacrifices and offerings could only be offered in a temple. So verse 27 does indeed reveal a new temple, after the one in verse 26 was destroyed.
Daniel 9:26 = Daniel 9:27, Why?
1.) It's a 70 week prophecy, not a 285+week prophecy
2.) There is no rebuilding of Jerusalem and the temple between daniel 9:26 and daniel 9:27
3.) Christ confirmed a covenant with his blood and ended the need for sacrificing.
4.) both verse talking about the 'end' that is decreed.
5.) It's feasible that this is hebrew parallelism
6.) just as the anointed is cut off (Jesus crucified) after the 69 weeks, in the 70th week, and the temple destroyed 40 years later, so to Jesus confirmed a covenant, ending the need for sacrifices, with his blood, in the 70th week, and the temple was destroyed 40 years later
Daniel 9:26a And after the sixty-two weeks, an anointed one shall be cut off and shall have nothing.
Daniel 9:27a And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week,
g and for half of the week he shall put an end to sacrifice and offering
Daniel 9:26b And the people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary. Its
f end shall come with a flood, and to the end there shall be war. Desolations are decreed
Daienl 9:27b And on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolate one.”