Originally Posted by
aiki
The reasons for living that you've mentioned above don't change the fact that, if you take a naturalistic viewpoint, you are merely a random accident.
Really? That’s interesting. As far as I had been told, my parents actually planned to have me.
Oh, I see, you derive your purpose in being from your parents. You exist merely because they decided they wanted a child. I'm curious: Did they choose who and what you are? I doubt it. Over that they had little, if any, control. All they wanted initially was a child, not you in particular. In the end, they got you, but it could just as easily have been someone else. If you truly take an atheistic view, random chance led a single one of the
millions of your father's sperm to your mother's egg and, voila, here you are. Your parents did not intend to have
you. You, according to naturalistic theory, just happened for no good reason.
No matter what meaning you eke out of your circumstances, you remain unintended and thus without intrinsic value.
So you think that if your God doesn’t exist then you would have no value to your family or friends? Are you saying that they would then consider you to be a worthless human being?
No, I said "no
intrinsic value." If you have value because you are valued by your family and friends, what value has a person who has neither? Such an externally asserted value is subject to fluctuation - as the Jews found out during the Second World War. Hitler thought very highly of the naturalistic worldview. It is no surprise then that he placed no intrinsic value in the Jewish people, or whoever he deemed to be of "lesser" value.
If you are truly just the result of random chance, then you can ultimately claim no more value for yourself than a rock, or an ant. They have come about through the very same act of chance as you and in this respect are your equal (tho', of course, they aren't as aware of this fact as you and I).
Well, without a belief in God what do your reasons for living matter? The question "Why am I here?" is answered by an atheist with "I don't know," or "There is no reason." This doesn't change by finding "reasons for living" of the sort you've offered. Such reasons don't fundamentally alter the basic fact that, from an atheistic viewpoint, you are the consequence of random chance.
My reasons for living matter to me because they provide my life with interest and enjoyment. I don’t need to believe in any gods for that to be the case. Why do you need to believe that there must be some greater reason for your existence? Why can’t you simply rejoice in the fact that you do exist and enjoy that fleeting existence while you can?
Because I am not content to live under the belief that I am merely an accident. Moreover, I find irresistible evidence that God exists.
What, may I ask, do you do if and when your reasons for living cease to interest you and cause you enjoyment? Do you just swap them out for another set? If you do, what would that suggest to you about the quality and nature of those reasons?
What about the person who has no access to those things you enjoy and that interest you? What does your atheistic viewpoint offer to someone who is born into destitution, disease and death? How do they find reasons for living in atheism? What comfort can you give to those whose lives are, from birth to death, nothing but sickness, and pain, and poverty? Your atheism, it would seem, loses its convenience in less affluent and easy circumstances.
Peace.