Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
dad said:Known by the facts of the bible, and science. We know it reaches us, therefore it could not always have been the physical universe only variety. We know light reaches us, just as it did Adam. It could reach neither if it took billions of years to get here, according to the bible timetable of several thousand years.
dad said:they can fly, disappear, etc., and so will we be able to
dad said:That's one described! I don't expect we will have the same exact relationships there as here, like He said. Things will be so sinless and wonderful, unselfish, diseaseless, and free, we won't need some exclusive arrangement, in the same way man now does!
I have to say that if you are not on target on these biblical issues, how can tertiary issues like the canopy be argued convincingly? Easy! If the physical was not all there was or will be, it is wonderfully, and entirely possible!
Sorry you can't take it, and have nothing to say, except hoping for ignorance support, and companyElduran said:Wow, 10 messages in a row that I couldn't see.... Blissful silence
Can someone who hasn't put dad on their ignore list let me know if he actually says anything which makes sense in future, as I'm just assuming it's all pointless from here on out
No I had a thread where it was brought out. They now put at least a part of the OT older than the dead sea scrolls. (Moses' prayer, about, 'make His face to shine on you'-etc.Nathan Poe said:You're making this all up, aren't you?
Actually, the dates are given of the generations right from Adam. This brings us up to about Solomon's time, (known history). As I have said before, there is a small, insignificant (because it is some hundreds of years only) possible variation. (Like when someone left a city, if it was before or after his son was born-etc).Nathan Poe said:The Bible has no timetable, unless you're stuck in the Ussher-only Box.
I was talking in most threads here about the spirit world, and the difference between the physical, and the spiritual. Not about some doctrinal hair splitting vaugue difference in Jesus and our new bodies, and that of the spiritual creations know as angels. I don't think anyone would have thought I meant we would be angels.The point I was making about being made like Christ as opposed to being made like angels is that you were making a statement which lessens the awesomeness of what will happen - to be made like Christ is far more amazing than being made like angels.
? I only touched on in in replies to other posts. I am happy, however, to have it set me apart from those of a churchy bend.But since you are obsessed with the whole marriage/sex topic...
Spirits can do all these things and a lot lot lot lot lot lot lot lot lot lot lot more. Jesus flew up into the clouds. Angels 'appeared' to men, and dissapeared, as did the ressurected Jesus to those, for example in a room. It says we will be like Him, after the rapture, so why would we not also be able to do these things? You sound a touch trigger happy on the accusitory tone here.they can fly, disappear, etc., and so will we be able to
Nowhere in Scripture does it say that - give me a chapter and verse for this statement or else you are in error regarding Scripture.
Maybe I should check out how many wives Solomon had, as well as his song? Hosea married a harlot, so that's no perfect example of chastity either. And on it goes. The boundries of theis sinful world, including marriage will not, of course be the same. I never said there was marriage like here did I? By the way, where do you think those heavenly kids came from?No, it is the way the union of Christ with his church is expressed - check out Hosea or the Song of Solomon, the language used describes the intimacy which will exist between God and those he justifies - the most intimate union which we as humans know is that of making love within the boundaries of marriage - it's showing that the relationship between God and his people will be completely intimate
????? I said Jesus is getting married, what claims are you talking about? Not the children and sex I hope?....this passage destroys your claims about marriage in heaven
Seems to me kids require some form of getting together, even if it isn't like our present monogomous marriages. So-- if scripture talks of children, it does lend support to people having them. Also, as I said, the angels came down, had sex with the daughters of men, and had giant babies as a result, you'll just have to deal with it.any notion of other unions is purely speculation, and not supported by Scripture.
So, we should lay down, and accept old ages, random appearing lifeforms, a fairy tale God, and bible, and simply read only a small section of mark? Jesus talked of the time of the garden, and also Noah, how they were 'swept away' etc. Maybe you oughta get down in prayer, and slap His wrist here as well?We're called t preach the gospel, not spend all our time on the tertiary issues:
Good stuff. Atheists and evos, you got all that?6But the righteousness that is by faith says: "Do not say in your heart, 'Who will ascend into heaven?' " (that is, to bring Christ down) 7"or 'Who will descend into the deep?' " (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). 8But what does it say? "The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart," that is, the word of faith we are proclaiming: 9That if you confess with your mouth, "Jesus is Lord," and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved. 11As the Scripture says, "Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame." 12For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, 13for, "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved."
Yes it is more important. But see how much you can squeeze into a science forum! As far as proving others wrong, why, if it's those who offend His beloved little children with doctrines of devils, and evoistic tales designed to replace the truth of God, why, heavens, you wouldn't expect one to take it up the tailpipe there would you now?Salvation is more important than creation, and the Gospel more important than debate - if your objective in this discussion is to merely prove yourself right and others wrong, you've missed the point of witness.
dad said:So, we should lay down, and accept old ages, random appearing lifeforms, a fairy tale God, and bible, and simply read only a small section of mark? Jesus talked of the time of the garden, and also Noah, how they were 'swept away' etc. Maybe you oughta get down in prayer, and slap His wrist here as well?
dad said:But see how much you can squeeze into a science forum!
.Stan the Man said:No, nor have I said anything of the kind. Which is more important - that people hear the gospel, or that people accept a particular theory about how things came into being?
[ I'd say He already laid out how things came to be-He created them. This is pretty basic. Basic enough for a creation versus evoism forum, anyhow. I don't hear you railing on the compromise theory types?]
No need to squeeze it - there's not a ban on posting the gospel here - let it flow
[I have talked about asking Jesus into one's heart on a number of occasions here. Mainly, I concentrated on illustrating evolution is a belief, and that, actually, the spiritual has more evidence than granny or the speck!]
I'm just saying if you want to make a point (like the one about angels, or sex after the resurrection, or whatever), you need to say which chapter and verse, not just "it says in the bible" - in the same way as when someone talks about a scientific piece of evidence you expect them to cite accurately, not just make a vague assertion[Fair enough. On the other hand, when I bring out the devision, or split in the days of Peleg, you have a responsibily to give biblical reason you think it couldn't be. As far as jesus appearing in a room to His deciples, flying up to heaven, etc. -that is not of great question, I don't think as to whether it's in the bible. So again, if you dispute it, you provide reasons. Same with the sons of God, who saw the daughters of men, that they were fair, and had children with them, if you have something to say, don't pretend I make this stuff up, come out with it, man. Same as I have provided chapter and verse as to how the sun will be forever, if you disagree, prove it, like I did! Etc. I know wherof I speak.]
Stan the Man said:I wasn't disputing whether or not these things happened in Scripture, I'm asking for a chapter an verse (which would need to come from either one of the prophets, or from the new testament) to suggest that this will again be the case, or rather, that it will be the case for us at the creation of the new heavens and the new earth.
And reference to Elijah and Moses with Jesus shows nothing about whether or not we will appear in that way - that event was a fulfilment of God's promise to both Elijah and Moses that they would see the glory of God. It shows that it has happened - it does not show that it will happen.]
Never said angels couldn't fly - asked why that means that we will, since we will be like Christ, not like angels.
All the things which happened regarding Jesus vanishing and appearing again prove nothing about whether or not we will do that - that was to prove that he had risen - we will not need to prove that to anyone.
dad said:Ge 3:8 - And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. So much for your theory
Shows how much you know about spirits. They can walk!Ge 3:8 - And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden. So much for your theory
So much for your biblcal interpretation. God is a spirit, just ask Jesus, he was the one who said it.
Where does Christ's teachings tell us spirits can't walk? Nice try.Shows how much you know about spirits. They can walk!
Shows how much you know about Christ's teaching. Do you even know what a spirit is?
I think you may be playing chinese checkers, and have lost many of your marbles. If you think you have some moves, let's see them. You don't, so I can enjoy the little attempts at acting superior, and talking big from an opposition is disarray who can muster nothing else!Aron-Ra said:Is it just Dad? Or have their been other creationists who like to declare "check and mate" despite the fact that they're only playing with checkers?
dad said:I think you may be playing chinese checkers, and have lost many of your marbles. If you think you have some moves, let's see them. You don't, so I can enjoy the little attempts at acting superior, and talking big from an opposition is disarray who can muster nothing else!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?