Was There a Pre-Adamic Race?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'll put this out just for interesting discussions as I really don't think it's all that 'theologically' related, BUT the fact that there has been a superabundance of VERY VERY LARGE SKELETONS found throughout the world is a FACT.

Yes, there are some internet fabrication photo's, but there is also an overwhelming amount of hard physical evidence that a GIANT RACE of HUMAN BEINGS once lived on this planet and did so an an organized way i.e. built tombs, temples and left all kinds of evidence that they were here and BEFORE us.

so...the topic is kind of interesting to say the least, imho.

s

Personally, I'd be very interested in this particular topic and abundantly more interested in any actual documentation and/or evidence of giants having lived in the past. You know, actual bones and that type of stuff. If you can actually provide any of the same, then why not start another thread on this topic? Again, I, for one, would be very interested in the same. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Personally, I'd be very interested in this particular topic and abundantly more interested in any actual documentation and/or evidence of giants having lived in the past. You know, actual bones and that type of stuff. If you can actually provide any of the same, then why not start another thread on this topic? Again, I, for one, would be very interested in the same. Thanks.

Well, that's kinda what this thread appears to be about.

A good documentary, for anyone who's interested, is here:

Mysterious Stone Chambers & Giants Discovered in New England- Jim Vieira - YouTube
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Because it is only a presumption that the days in Genesis were only 24 hour days.

What does the length of time in a day have to do with any alleged pre-Adamic race? Again, we're looking for actual scriptures which speak of the same and there aren't any. Btw, you don't really think that there were millions or billions of years between the plants being created and the sun being created, do you? Also, I think that we all know what "and the evening and the morning were the first day" means...;)

We're talking the potential of a pre Adamic race and that potential is certainly attested to by carbon dated bone remnants.

Carbon dating has many problems with it, but, again, I'm looking for scripture. Got any?

The text attests to entire races of UNSEEN beings. Don't know how a person could read and actually miss that fact. In fact if we differentiated devils from Holy Angels that would be two different races or genus of beings, and possibly several others. And these probably pre-existed Adam as well.

s

Which "text" are you referring to? Anyhow, I don't doubt that angels existed pre-Adam. In fact, scripture plainly teaches that they did, but I thought that we were talking about HUMANS. Does anybody have a text that teaches that there were HUMANS pre-Adam? No, no one does, nor will they ever.
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,422
26,863
Pacific Northwest
✟730,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Over the years I've heard now & then about the possibility that a human like race lived prior to Adam, or even in conjunction with Adam and this explains the huge difference in races amongst other things.

I'd like to hear the thoughts of others if you would...
Was there a race of beings on earth prior to Adam and humans?
What do you believe and why? - Please provide scripture if you can..

By those who groups who speak of a "Pre-Adamic race"--what they mean by such is hokum.

All people today are "in Adam", regardless of ethnicity or skin color.

Now scientifically speaking the hominid line has evolved over millions of years, and there have been numerous hominid species, with some living side-by-side with others.

Homo erectus was eventually replaced by Homo sapiens, though the two lived side by side for quite some time.

Neanderthals, of which there is some disagreement whether they are to be classified as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis or Homo neanderthaensis seems to exist; it is now known that modern Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens sapiens) and Neanderthals did breed, and thus many today have Neanderthal DNA.

So in that sense, sure we could speak of hominids "before Adam", where Adam is understood as the first spiritually cognizant hominid from which we are all descended, understanding the narrative of Genesis 2 as being a theological text, not a strictly "historical" one.

But, again, those who tend to speak of a "pre-Adamic race" are usually various "race theorists" who adhere to unorthodox theologies, usually in order to try and make one "race" of man the "pure Adamic race" (usually white people) and everyone else somehow "sub-human". This was common in the 19th century, and in the early part of the 20th century.

Besides the obvious problems with this is that it presumes that "races" are somehow concrete realities of humanity. But there are no concrete, distinct "races", instead there is a gradient of peoples. It is more-or-less social convenience to speak of "white people" or "black people" or "Asians". But nobody is a "pure race" of anything, we are the sum of our ancestry, and our various characteristics (e.g. skin color) are expressed through the gradient of humanity across the globe. In other words, people groups from any given location are going to more closely resemble near-neighbor people groups. And things like skin color has largely been determined by the adaptation of people groups based on climate--people groups farther from the equator receive less UV-light and thus produce less of the UV-protecting pigment melanin in the skin; thus people further from the equator have lighter skin while people nearer to the equator have darker skin. Such melanin mutations are also the reason for eye color and hair color mutations (blue/green eyes are a result of a lack of melanin in the eye; whereas blonde and red hair are also the result of a lack of melanin in the hair).

A good example might be to look at Europe. Begin with Scandinavia and start moving south until you get to the Mediteranean, move south from southern Italy and Sicily and then North Africa. Then move south of the Sahara etc.

It's a gradient, distinct, concrete human "races" more-or-less are a matter of social convenience, not because there is actually such a thing as a "white race" or a "black race" or a "yellow race" etc.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Fireinfolding

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2006
27,263
4,084
The South
✟121,561.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is that skull real or just another internet hoax?

They have tons of exposing videos on fakes, even showing how to make your own, or how to photoshop one. Some of whats being put out there as genuine but was really sculpted, sometimes the same skull is being used in two different discoveries. Even ordinary human remains are used in some of the photos.

Probrobly cant tell always by sight by a picture because that can be deceptive, but theres some really good videos out there exposing the fakes.

speaks of giants in scripture, I dont see the sizes of those matching whats suppose to be genuine. Just good enough for me such are mentioned, I dont need a bone to believe the scripture.
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
By those who groups who speak of a "Pre-Adamic race"--what they mean by such is hokum.

All people today are "in Adam", regardless of ethnicity or skin color.

Now scientifically speaking the hominid line has evolved over millions of years, and there have been numerous hominid species, with some living side-by-side with others.

Homo erectus was eventually replaced by Homo sapiens, though the two lived side by side for quite some time.

Neanderthals, of which there is some disagreement whether they are to be classified as Homo sapiens neanderthalensis or Homo neanderthaensis seems to exist; it is now known that modern Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens sapiens) and Neanderthals did breed, and thus many today have Neanderthal DNA.

So in that sense, sure we could speak of hominids "before Adam", where Adam is understood as the first spiritually cognizant hominid from which we are all descended, understanding the narrative of Genesis 2 as being a theological text, not a strictly "historical" one.

But, again, those who tend to speak of a "pre-Adamic race" are usually various "race theorists" who adhere to unorthodox theologies, usually in order to try and make one "race" of man the "pure Adamic race" (usually white people) and everyone else somehow "sub-human". This was common in the 19th century, and in the early part of the 20th century.

Besides the obvious problems with this is that it presumes that "races" are somehow concrete realities of humanity. But there are no concrete, distinct "races", instead there is a gradient of peoples. It is more-or-less social convenience to speak of "white people" or "black people" or "Asians". But nobody is a "pure race" of anything, we are the sum of our ancestry, and our various characteristics (e.g. skin color) are expressed through the gradient of humanity across the globe. In other words, people groups from any given location are going to more closely resemble near-neighbor people groups. And things like skin color has largely been determined by the adaptation of people groups based on climate--people groups farther from the equator receive less UV-light and thus produce less of the UV-protecting pigment melanin in the skin; thus people further from the equator have lighter skin while people nearer to the equator have darker skin. Such melanin mutations are also the reason for eye color and hair color mutations (blue/green eyes are a result of a lack of melanin in the eye; whereas blonde and red hair are also the result of a lack of melanin in the hair).

A good example might be to look at Europe. Begin with Scandinavia and start moving south until you get to the Mediteranean, move south from southern Italy and Sicily and then North Africa. Then move south of the Sahara etc.

It's a gradient, distinct, concrete human "races" more-or-less are a matter of social convenience, not because there is actually such a thing as a "white race" or a "black race" or a "yellow race" etc.

-CryptoLutheran

Speaking of hokum...
 
Upvote 0

squint

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2007
16,182
903
Mountain Regions
✟20,405.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What does the length of time in a day have to do with any alleged pre-Adamic race?

I was just identifying that I am not a strict literalist as some of the 6000 year creationist believers and that there are other credible sights available than that one available to believers.

Again, we're looking for actual scriptures which speak of the same and there aren't any.
Scriptures certainly do not preclude races prior to 'us' as mankind currently. And yes, scriptures also cite 'beings' or 'entities' prior to mankind, such as satan and devils and even holy angels, ALL pre Adamic. Even Jesus was PRE Adamic.

Btw, you don't really think that there were millions or billions of years between the plants being created and the sun being created, do you?
I don't think it all transpired in a strict 6 literal days with 24 hours, no.

Also, I think that we all know what "and the evening and the morning were the first day" means...;)
I'm not fond of positions that require literal days or hours for their understandings as there is ample scriptural evidence that shows that isn't 'always' the case.

Carbon dating has many problems with it, but, again, I'm looking for scripture. Got any?
I've already referenced at least 3 commonly known (or at least should be by you) entity classes that existed prior to Adam. You shouldn't need me to do your homework for those scriptural facts.

Which "text" are you referring to? Anyhow, I don't doubt that angels existed pre-Adam.
Well, there ya go.

In fact, scripture plainly teaches that they did, but I thought that we were talking about HUMANS.
The thread heading doesn't specify that.

Does anybody have a text that teaches that there were HUMANS pre-Adam? No, no one does, nor will they ever.
I've already said that archeology records show a much longer dating of human 'type' activity and bones than 6000 years and that scripture doesn't preclude that as a possibility.

s
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
They have tons of exposing videos on fakes, even showing how to make your own, or how to photoshop one. Some of whats being put out there as genuine but was really sculpted, sometimes the same skull is being used in two different discoveries. Even ordinary human remains are used in some of the photos.

Probrobly cant tell always by sight by a picture because that can be deceptive, but theres some really good videos out there exposing the fakes.

speaks of giants in scripture, I dont see the sizes of those matching whats suppose to be genuine. Just good enough for me such are mentioned, I dont need a bone to believe the scripture.

Personally, I don't "need a bone" (but shock treatment is looking pretty good at the moment ^_^) either, but, seeing how I deal with a lot of atheistic "scientists" (or those falsely so-called), an actual bone or two might come in handy (to hit them over the head with ^_^)...
 
Upvote 0

Rev Randy

Sometimes I pretend to be normal
Aug 14, 2012
7,410
643
Florida,USA
✟25,153.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
As far as the text of Genesis goes, I do not believe that it teaches that there were humans before Adam and Eve.
Teaches is the key word. I think all it teaches is that God created man out of the elements he'd already created. Exactly how I don't speculate much. I wouldn't begin to understand the ways of God.
I do see much symbolism in Gemesis. Not unlike Revelation. Adam means human man.. If we lose sight of that we can lose site of the entire creation.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,422
26,863
Pacific Northwest
✟730,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Speaking of hokum...

Okay, besides the evolutionary aspect which I touched upon--which I know you disagree with and I am not going to get into a debate about here--what exactly was hokum in my description of:

A) The bogus racialist theologies of the 19th and early 20th century
and
B) That human variation is a gradient and not a set of concrete "races"

?

Or were you just commenting on the evolutionary part of my post?

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Knee V

It's phonetic.
Sep 17, 2003
8,415
1,741
41
South Bend, IN
✟100,823.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Teaches is the key word. I think all it teaches is that God created man out of the elements he'd already created. Exactly how I don't speculate much. I wouldn't begin to understand the ways of God.
I do see much symbolism in Gemesis. Not unlike Revelation. Adam means human man.. If we lose sight of that we can lose site of the entire creation.

I generally have a problem with using the text of Genesis to prove things that simply aren't explicitely stated in Genesis: "proving" that each day is millions of years, or "proving" that they are 24 hours, or "proving" that Adam was an "8th day creation", or "proving" any numbet of other things that are beyond the scope of what is written in the text. I am not advocating hyper-literalism, but Genesis is not full of codes and secret knowledge that was unavailable to us before Dr Strong.
 
Upvote 0

bornofGod888

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2013
2,030
336
Hidden with Christ in God (Col. 3:3)
✟3,812.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Okay, besides the evolutionary aspect which I touched upon--which I know you disagree with and I am not going to get into a debate about here--what exactly was hokum in my description of:

A) The bogus racialist theologies of the 19th and early 20th century
and
B) That human variation is a gradient and not a set of concrete "races"

?

Or were you just commenting on the evolutionary part of my post?

-CryptoLutheran

I was commenting on the evolutionary part of your post. Quite frankly, once I saw that, I stopped reading.
 
Upvote 0

Rev Randy

Sometimes I pretend to be normal
Aug 14, 2012
7,410
643
Florida,USA
✟25,153.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I generally have a problem with using the text of Genesis to prove things that simply aren't explicitely stated in Genesis: "proving" that each day is millions of years, or "proving" that they are 24 hours, or "proving" that Adam was an "8th day creation", or "proving" any numbet of other things that are beyond the scope of what is written in the text. I am not advocating hyper-literalism, but Genesis is not full of codes and secret knowledge that was unavailable to us before Dr Strong.
Neither is Revelation. Just messages written to the Church(es) of that day.
An account given through inspiration not a list of scientific facts.
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Where does it say Adam was "ruddy"?


Adam #120, from #199 ruddy, i.e. a human being (an individual, species, mankind. #199 to show blood in the face, flush, turn rosy.

As was Adam....so was the Adamic line, as mentioned of David and Esau. As they were ruddy then their genetic line was ruddy.


The Scriptures plainly say that all those who believe have been born of the Spirit. Is Eve this Spirit then?

Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit." John 3:5-6
No, Eve is not the spirit. She is, however, the mother of all living for from her is The Son who is The Spirit.


PS. I know what you are attempting to do, but I'm afraid Matthew 12:46-50 is not going to work in this context.
I don't understand....the following has nothing to do with Eve being the mother of all living spiritually. Actually, it validates what I am saying:

Matthew 12:46-50 While He yet talked to the people, behold, His mother and His brethren stood without, desiring to speak with Him. Then one said unto Him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with Thee. But He answered and said unto him that told Him, Who is My mother? and who are My brethren? And He stretched forth His hand toward His disciples, and said, Behold My mother and My brethren! For whosoever shall do the will of My Father which is in heaven, the same is My brother, and sister, and mother.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Was There a Pre-Adamic Race? "

Sure there was, but since the bible begins about 5 or 6 thousand years ago such discussions can hardly seem edifying in a christian context .


My reckoning places the beginning of this age at 14,000 years. I believe to know of the previous age, at least what He allows us to know, and that He began anew in this age...is very edifying.

So much to learn and so little time. :)
 
Upvote 0

YeShallTread

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,589
240
✟2,637.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah, the son of Jesse was spoken as being of "ruddy" appearance:

And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. 1 Samuel 17:42


It is interesting to know that the reason David was disdained by the Philistine was the fact that David was ruddy. Meaning, the Philistine wasn't ruddy.


Editing in:

That disdainment the Philistine showed was....racism.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.