Another word on one of Charlie Kirk's views: RACE.

[Larniavc]

He was asking legitimate questions about affirmative action and DEI policies.

What he said was racist. You need to re align in your head the difference between what YOU incorrectly think is not racist with what everyone else thinks is racist.

Why do you need to do that? So people don’t draw erroneous conclusions about you because I don’t think you are a racist.

 

[Larniavc]

If (race) is intrinsically more violent because they lack neanderthal dna from 120,000 years ago.

Yeah but that is not true. Don’t be silly. Injuries found on remains of Neanderthals had horrendous injuries showing that they had a far more dangerous existence than the relatively fragile and gracile h. Sapiens Sapiens.

 

[RocksInMyHead]

It is not racist to mention the race of 80% of those receiving benefits by race.

Mentioning race isn't racist. Implying (or even outright stating) that someone is inferior because of their race is though. Oh - like this:

If (race) is intrinsically more violent because they lack neanderthal dna from 120,000 years ago. These problems will get worse not better. In a sense, we are falling already to manage this problem.