DiscipleDave
Well-Known Member
very true.
I just don't think a 50/50 is good Christology... doesn't change the matter, of course.
confused what it has to do with admonishing the status of woman though?
very true.
I just don't think a 50/50 is good Christology... doesn't change the matter, of course.
confused what it has to do with admonishing the status of woman though?
What am i to do with this generation that is before my eyes. The message had nothing to do with the numbers, only used the numbers to make a point, that only Jesus was part divine, and that Mary was not. Are you yet without understanding ? Mary was 100% human. for those who will debate about numbers, you cannot have more then 100%, it is complete. A person is gives 100% has gave all that they could possibly have given. Anything more then 100% is just illogical. Funny how satan will cause people to veer away from the topic, only to criticize others because of formalities, altogether not getting the message. Mary was 100% human, this is fact and is undebatable, there is not arguement here. She had a human mother and a human father, making her 100% human. Children can understand this. and they shall judge us. Jesus was not 100% human, because He had a divine Father, He did not have a human father, Therefore, now follow me on this. He is only 50% human, that is HALF for those who need clarifying, 50% of something, being in fact 1/2 of something. Therefore Jesus is in fact 50% Human, and 50% divine. If you are yet without understanding concerning the numbers, email me, and i will be more then happy to explain to you what percentages mean. Anyway the main point of the message, wasn't not the percentages, but was that Jesus was not fully human, and Mary was. Mary sinned just as well as all fully humans have.
^i^
Upvote
0