Twitter and the Hunter Biden laptop

[Valletta]

In November 2020, former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said Twitter made a “mistake” by barring users from sharing The Post’s revelatory report about Hunter Biden’s emails.
“We recognize it as a mistake that we made, both in terms of the intention of the policy and also the enforcement action of not allowing people to share it publicly or privately,” Dorsey said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, in which he and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg were grilled by lawmakers over their companies’ influence and perceived anti-conservative bias.
Bill Maher says Twitter 'failed' for censoring Post's report on Hunter Biden laptop

There are two concerns I have from this story. One is the continued suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Joe Biden misled the people of this country in the presidential debates and still has not been honest about the laptop. When there is potential influence by foreign powers on the president of the United States that story should be well covered. The second concern I have is about the overall suppression of freedom of speech. This is what one side turns to when they are unable to win in an open and fair debate.

 

[HTacianas]

In November 2020, former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said Twitter made a “mistake” by barring users from sharing The Post’s revelatory report about Hunter Biden’s emails.
“We recognize it as a mistake that we made, both in terms of the intention of the policy and also the enforcement action of not allowing people to share it publicly or privately,” Dorsey said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, in which he and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg were grilled by lawmakers over their companies’ influence and perceived anti-conservative bias.
Bill Maher says Twitter 'failed' for censoring Post's report on Hunter Biden laptop

There are two concerns I have from this story. One is the continued suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Joe Biden misled the people of this country in the presidential debates and still has not been honest about the laptop. When there is potential influence by foreign powers on the president of the United States that story should be well covered. The second concern I have is about the overall suppression of freedom of speech. This is what one side turns to when they are unable to win in an open and fair debate.

The problem you're up against is that people of a certain stripe are all political all the time. They cannot separate their ideological beliefs from anything else in life. We see examples of it in Twitter's suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story and the media in general working as hard and as fast as they could to also suppress it. There are no professional ethics on their part and they cannot suppress their own feelings when they get in the way. We are seeing yet another example of it in the leaking of the draft Supreme Court decision just yesterday. Some clerk -a licensed attorney- or someone else working for the Supreme Court set aside any sense of professional integrity for the sake of their politics. Those people are dangerous. One of these days, if it hasn't already happened, someone is going to go into an emergency room and say the "wrong thing" and be left to die by some ideologue.

 

[BPPLEE]

In November 2020, former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said Twitter made a “mistake” by barring users from sharing The Post’s revelatory report about Hunter Biden’s emails.
“We recognize it as a mistake that we made, both in terms of the intention of the policy and also the enforcement action of not allowing people to share it publicly or privately,” Dorsey said during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, in which he and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg were grilled by lawmakers over their companies’ influence and perceived anti-conservative bias.
Bill Maher says Twitter 'failed' for censoring Post's report on Hunter Biden laptop

There are two concerns I have from this story. One is the continued suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Joe Biden misled the people of this country in the presidential debates and still has not been honest about the laptop. When there is potential influence by foreign powers on the president of the United States that story should be well covered. The second concern I have is about the overall suppression of freedom of speech. This is what one side turns to when they are unable to win in an open and fair debate.

The story wasn't just suppressed it was labeled Russian disinformation. I have read some articles that say enough Biden voters have said they wouldn't have voted for him if they knew about the story that it would have changed the results of the election.

 

[Valletta]

The story wasn't just suppressed it was labeled Russian disinformation. I have read some articles that say enough Biden voters have said they wouldn't have voted for him if they knew about the story that it would have changed the results of the election.

You're correct, there was an expert quoted back in October of 2020, just before the election, here is the comment that was posted on Twitter:
“We should view it as a Trump campaign product,” one expert said about the story.
https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1316582473736900609
Today we know that expert was Nina Jankowicz, Joe's choice to head the the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board:
Biden starts Disinformation Board led by Russia 'expert' who called Hunter's laptop 'Trump product' | Daily Mail Online

 

[Tanj]

This is what one side turns to when they are unable to win in an open and fair debate.

Did you accidentally mix up two different posts into one? Because the beginning of this paragraph was about twitter.

 

[cow451]

The story wasn't just suppressed it was labeled Russian disinformation. I have read some articles that say enough Biden voters have said they wouldn't have voted for him if they knew about the story that it would have changed the results of the election.

You can’t find ten of those people in any one state.

 

[Aryeh Jay]

You can’t find ten of those people in any one state.

But somehow a blind man with able to see things on the laptop. Clearly miracles still exist. Trump Won!

 

[inquiring mind]

The story wasn't just suppressed it was labeled Russian disinformation. I have read some articles that say enough Biden voters have said they wouldn't have voted for him if they knew about the story that it would have changed the results of the election.

I’d like to think so, but I see many people on forums, media and everyday life still defending Biden. At this point I’m wondering if anything would change their minds, even 2 ½ more years of this insanity.

 

[durangodawood]

In the age of gerrymandering, whatever you can get away with should be on the table.

 

[wing2000]

When there is potential influence by foreign powers on the president of the United States that story should be well covered.

You don't say?

Name one action by Joe Biden that would suggest he is under the influence of some foreign entity.

 

[Aryeh Jay]

You don't say?

Name one action by Joe Biden that would suggest he is under the influence of some foreign entity.

Clearly he is under the influence of Ukraine because he is saying bad things about Russia. And is providing weapons to Ukraine that are being used to kill Russian peacekeepers.

 

[inquiring mind]

You don't say?

Name one action by Joe Biden that would suggest he is under the influence of some foreign entity.

Just on a quick inventory… would perpetuating our national suicide count?

 

[wing2000]

Just on a quick inventory… would perpetuating our national suicide count?

One action (based on real events, not your imagination).

 

[inquiring mind]

One action (based on real events, not your imagination).

Okay, do policies that helped keep Putin in the oil business count?

 

[BPPLEE]

I’d like to think so, but I see many people on forums, media and everyday life still defending Biden. At this point I’m wondering if anything would change their minds, even 2 ½ more years of this insanity.

Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media

 

[BPPLEE]

You can’t find ten of those people in any one state.

Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media

 

[Aryeh Jay]

Wow, a news source that gives me every Trump endorsed candidate to vote for. You can't get any more impartial than that.

 

[BPPLEE]

You're correct, there was an expert quoted back in October of 2020, just before the election, here is the comment that was posted on Twitter:
“We should view it as a Trump campaign product,” one expert said about the story.
https://twitter.com/globalnews/status/1316582473736900609
Today we know that expert was Nina Jankowicz, Joe's choice to head the the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board:
Biden starts Disinformation Board led by Russia 'expert' who called Hunter's laptop 'Trump product' | Daily Mail Online

Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media

 

[ottawak]

Just on a quick inventory… would perpetuating our national suicide count?

What? Has the suicide rate increased during the Biden administration?

 

[Valletta]

You don't say?

Name one action by Joe Biden that would suggest he is under the influence of some foreign entity.

Allowing so much fentanyl into the country--most of it comes from China.

 

[Aryeh Jay]

You were expecting to see it on MSNBC?

No, I was hoping that there was a segment of the population who has the ability to research a candidate and vote accordingly instead of just voting for the picks of the guy who lost.