Attack the source, just like attacking the Steele dossier, with many things it verified:
Since it is your post/OP, did you even check it's validity?
Upvote
0
Attack the source, just like attacking the Steele dossier, with many things it verified:
Maybe because there is no business relationship or project. The project and the relationships around it were abandoned. They never materialized. They do not exist. So where is the hard and fast lie?If Trump truly believed he was allowed to negotiate any deals he wanted, why did he repeatedly insist he had no business relationships or projects in Russia, when those claims were hard and fast lies?
Maybe because there is no business relationship or project. The project and the relationships around it were abandoned. They never materialized. They do not exist. So where is the hard and fast lie?
Once again there was never anything about a private business man looking into a project in Russia that is against the law. Lets stick to the facts and not get into speculation about potentially problematic issues that did not and have not happenedAbandoning something doesn't mean it's not a problem. As was mentioned back when donald junior tried the excuse of, "We didn't get anything from them." it was brought up that you can still be charged with conspiracy even if you fail to do it, like hiring a undercover cop for a assasination, or buying drugs from the police, the fact that you wer never going to get something, is no defense against trying. Just because the deal didn't go through doesn't make the deal potentially problematic or ilegal.
Once again there was never anything about a private business man looking into a project in Russia that is against the law. Lets stick to the facts and not get into speculation about potentially problematic issues that did not and have not happened
Once again there was never anything about a private business man looking into a project in Russia that is against the law. Lets stick to the facts and not get into speculation about potentially problematic issues that did not and have not happened
I would agree that if in fact, and the facts have yet to be established all we have is unverified reports, Trump ordered such a thing he has a real serious problem. My point was that there was no reason or motivation for him to try to cover up something that was not a crime to begin with, so there is doubt that he would have done that.No, there isn't. However, there are legal issues involved with lying to Congress, particularly ordering a subordinate to lie to Congress -- which is the crime being discussed here. The fact remain, Trump had plans to build a hotel in Russia, and relationships had been built to make it come to pass. Trump then (at least allegedly) ordered Cohen to deny that plan existed -- that is a crime called Subornation of perjury (again, if the allegations in this article are true) and a primary reason Nixon's impeachment was proceeding before he resigned.
I would agree that if in fact, and the facts have yet to be established all we have is unverified reports, Trump ordered such a thing he has a real serious problem. My point was that there was no reason or motivation for him to try to cover up something that was not a crime to begin with, so there is doubt that he would have done that.
Pure speculation on your part and there was no deal so there was not any financing.I can think of a number of reasons that he would want to keep the deal secret. If the means by which it was being financed were a bit shady, for example...
I would agree that if in fact, and the facts have yet to be established all we have is unverified reports, Trump ordered such a thing he has a real serious problem. My point was that there was no reason or motivation for him to try to cover up something that was not a crime to begin with, so there is doubt that he would have done that.
Pure speculation on your part and there was no deal so there was not any financing.
The Special Council's office has now gone on record stating Buzzfeed's article about Cohen being directed to lie by Trump is not accurate.
The Special Council's office has now gone on record stating Buzzfeed's article about Cohen being directed to lie by Trump is not accurate.
YupThe Special Council's office has now gone on record stating Buzzfeed's article about Cohen being directed to lie by Trump is not accurate.
Like who?
Like who? Like Jerome Corsi.
"The special counsel and his prosecutorial staff threatened to indict Dr. Corsi, who is now 72 years old, and effectively put him in jail for the rest of his life, unless Dr. Corsi would provide the false testimony that they demanded, even after being informed that the testimony desired would be false," says the 78-page document. "This is criminal."
Corsi files formal complaint against Mueller
Wow now there is a shock.....Fake News strikes again.....You would think the public would be wise to the game by now...... but then some people just hate Trump so much that they desperately want to believe anything...The Russians no doubt enjoying this, they are sitting back letting the American press go to all extremes to destroy an American president....and half of the American people cant wait for it to happen... What a country.The Special Council's office has now gone on record stating Buzzfeed's article about Cohen being directed to lie by Trump is not accurate.