Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
question: My question is concerning the use of the name for G-d: YHWH. It is my understanding that the Israelites substituted the name Adonai for YHWH when reading scripture in order to keep from wrongly pronouncing the name and/or using the name in vain. Is this correct? My reason in asking this is due to my conversation with a person involved in the Sacred Name movement, that is that one must only refer to G-d as YHWH or Yahweh because the word God is translated from the name Gad a pagan god.
response:Dear Jesaiah,
You are correct--Adonai is Hebrew for "My Lord." It was traditional not to pronounce the Hebrew letters of God's name, YHVH, for it was considered too sacred.
Your friend is wrong. I have never heard about what he is talking about. The word God in English comes from the word "good."
Sincerely,
Rabbi Daniel Kohn
The theological term hypostatic union has its origins in the Council of Chalcedon and emphasizes that Jesus Christ was fully God and fully man at the same time. It is used to affirm the union of Jesus divine and human natures in one personthat Jesus Christ is perfectly God and perfectly man. Or, as theologians say, He is consubstantial with God as to His deity and with mankind as to His humanity.
Soon after the establishment of the church, doctrinal errors arose concerning the person of Jesus Christ. In October of A.D. 451, a large church council convened in the city of Chalcedon near Constantinople. After much discussion, the Council issued a statement to correct the errors and to establish an accurate theological statement concerning the person and nature of Christ. The fruit of their labor is perhaps the most significant Christological statement in the history of the church:
We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood; truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body; consubstantial [coessential, of the same substance] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the God-bearer, according to the Manhood; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeable, indivisibly, inseparably; the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God, the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ, as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has been handed down to us.
So what errors did the Council of Chalcedon correct?
In order to correct the view of Apollinarius, who believed Christ did not have a human mind or soul, the Council wrote that Jesus was truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body . . . consubstantial [coessential, of the same substance] with us according to the Manhood; in all things like unto us.
To correct the teachings of Nestorianism, that Christ was two different persons united in one body, the council wrote that He was indivisibly, inseparably...concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons.
And finally, in rejecting the errors of Monophysitism, which taught Christ had but one nature and that His union with the Divine nature obliterated His human nature, the council wrote that Christ was to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably . . . the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved.
Originally posted by wannabe
[and Louis if the Rabbi's answer for "God" is coming from the word "good"
the first thing the Rabbi is lacking is "common sense" and if you believe him I hate to think what you are lacking.
It was the ORTHODOX Jews and the Pharisees who condemned Yahshua to His grave!