BeforeThereWas
Seasoned Warrior
- Mar 14, 2005
- 2,450
- 59
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
So, jesusiam, are you saying that a group errecting monuments to their own pride (all in the name of God, or course), as an expression of their indifference to the needs of the needy, is wrong? How could that be wrong when they call such things their "house of God"?
After all, they had the temple back then, so why not the parallels today? Never mind that they are mostly a HUGE drain on resources.
I still can't seem to get an answer to my question from the pro-required-tithing camp. How is handing over the primary, largest portion of one's giving to religious organizations synonymous with giving to God; considering that the majority of what's handed over to them is absorbed into the facility expenditures and professional staffing paychecks?
How does denying the needs to the needy an honor unto the Lord? The system of tithing under the Law saw to the needs of the needy AND those who served the Lord. Today, many religious people see to the needs of their communal buildings and professional hirelings FIRST AND FOREMOST before the needs of the needy.
Does the problem here register for everyone? Will repeating it another way make it more clear? And yet, the status quo rolls along merrily without abating. The slowdown seems to be the result only of so many people losing their jobs, and therefore increasing the numbers of the needy in local communities, most of who go ignored by those handing their giving over to religious "church" organizations.
In my city, it's only the POOREST organizations that actually do ANYTHING for the needy in our local communities. The more wealthy medium and large sized organizations continue to pump their support overseas and into projects that bring them the most noteriety here on earth.
So, who has a legitimate defense of the status quo?
Anyone?
BTW
After all, they had the temple back then, so why not the parallels today? Never mind that they are mostly a HUGE drain on resources.
I still can't seem to get an answer to my question from the pro-required-tithing camp. How is handing over the primary, largest portion of one's giving to religious organizations synonymous with giving to God; considering that the majority of what's handed over to them is absorbed into the facility expenditures and professional staffing paychecks?
How does denying the needs to the needy an honor unto the Lord? The system of tithing under the Law saw to the needs of the needy AND those who served the Lord. Today, many religious people see to the needs of their communal buildings and professional hirelings FIRST AND FOREMOST before the needs of the needy.
Does the problem here register for everyone? Will repeating it another way make it more clear? And yet, the status quo rolls along merrily without abating. The slowdown seems to be the result only of so many people losing their jobs, and therefore increasing the numbers of the needy in local communities, most of who go ignored by those handing their giving over to religious "church" organizations.
In my city, it's only the POOREST organizations that actually do ANYTHING for the needy in our local communities. The more wealthy medium and large sized organizations continue to pump their support overseas and into projects that bring them the most noteriety here on earth.
So, who has a legitimate defense of the status quo?
Anyone?
BTW
Upvote
0