• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The Scriptures and Authority

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
66
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Huh? How is their communion any different than yours? :confused:

In the way you used the term, it is different in many ways.

But I was using the term in the Orthodox manner, IOW Eucharistic Communion is sharing in Common of the Pure Body and Precious Blood of Christ. We are one in that Cup, united in Body and belief. We do not share that Cup or belief with anyone else.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Orthodoxy, in my opinion, replaced faith; the Holy Spirit, substituting out the teaching of the Holy Spirit for man's reasoning about the Holy Spirit. Orthodoxy set itself up to be the kingdom of God to its adherents. Ergo, if one violates orthodoxy one is a heretic and doomed to hell, invalidating Paul's declaration in Gal 2.20 ".... I now live ....... by the faith of the Son of God,...." ....*Plus nothing

*[emphasis added]
Wanna serve up some more scripture with that assertion ? :p
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
Wanna serve up some more scripture with that assertion ?

Sorry, but scripture is not much available for such understanding except for us to make distinctions, have discernment between what was purposed-intended from the orginal texts, as best we have them, and what we wound up with after the Apostles died off. It is easy to see that we went from an understanding of the Church being an organism to the present which is an organization, full of man's reasoning.

For instance: The Kingdom of God was one of two messages of Jesus Christ. The other being of His redemption. The Kingdom is mentiond by Jesus about 100 times in the gospels. Aside from the "Lords Prayer", find where else the Kingdom of God is mentioned in the creeds of the orthodoxy.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Sorry, but scripture is not much available for such understanding except for us to make distinctions, have discernment between what was purposed-intended from the orginal texts, as best we have them, and what we wound up with after the Apostles died off. It is easy to see that we went from an understanding of the Church being an organism to the present which is an organization, full of man's reasoning.

For instance: The Kingdom of God was one of two messages of Jesus Christ. The other being of His redemption. The Kingdom is mentiond by Jesus about 100 times in the gospels. Aside from the "Lords Prayer", find where else the Kingdom of God is mentioned in the creeds of the orthodoxy.
it just seems that your understanding of Orthodoxy is incomplete; to make such an assertion you would have to "know" something (a relatedness issue) versus understand ( observe and delineate).
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
it just seems that your understanding of Orthodoxy is incomplete; to make such an assertion you would have to "know" something (a relatedness issue) versus understand ( observe and delineate).

Perhaps you can demonstrate with your understanding where you believe my weakness to be?
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
because its one thing to look at history, practice, etc etc and quite another to participate, to be "engaged". I may be way off, but many assessments of Orthodoxy don't look beyond the surface, and therefore find only "surface"...

I understand but that is not me. I see a distinction difference beteen the Kingdom and Church which, after the Apostlic age, set itself up as being the Kingdom. Can't you see this from history as well? Certainly that is going beyond the surface and seeing something much deeper.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
I understand but that is not me. I see a distinction difference beteen the Kingdom and Church which, after the Apostlic age, set itself up as being the Kingdom. Can't you see this from history as well? Certainly that is going beyond the surface and seeing something much deeper.
its "one version" of history, told with an underlying bias or expectation.
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
the "evidence" is that which you find, read on the surface and based on your understanding. It may be an assembly of some "facts", but is sifted through expectations based on a particular understanding; that doesn't mean its true.

You mean like the front page newspapers and the religious pronouncements of the CC inferring, "Swing on my gate or you don't go to heaven"?
 
Upvote 0

Ormly

Senior Veteran
Dec 11, 2004
6,230
94
✟7,151.00
Faith
Christian
what things ?

The matters we speak of.

and are similarities maintained when sifted through a different "understanding" ?

Please show me the difference that I might be corrected. I don't know much about the EO except it is a split off the RCC; holding other issues as more valid. Perhaps I should understand more before commenting on "these things"?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.