• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Status
Not open for further replies.

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian

Ah, I was wondering why you are so vehement about there being apostles today. You claim to be one yourself!

Are you an eye-witness to the resurrected Christ?

Were you appointed by Christ himself?

Do you have the marks of an apostle and perform miracles such as raising people from the dead?

Do you speak infallibly for Christ as his spokesman?

Should we regard your posts as scripture?
 
Upvote 0

Deborah D

Prayer Warrior
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
1,059
1,101
USA
✟247,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
The two prophets are proof that prophecy has now ceased! God would not have to specifically raise up 2 prophets if the gift of prophecy was still active.
No, SM, you have it backwards. The fact that the two prophets will be raised up shows that prophecy is still active!
 
Reactions: Alithis
Upvote 0

W2L

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2016
20,085
10,988
USA
✟213,593.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No, SM, you have it backwards. The fact that the two prophets will be raised up shows that prophecy is still active!

For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.” (Revelation 19:10)
 
Reactions: Alithis
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian
There were many apostles after the resurrection and they are still needed for the church today until we all come in the unity of the faith unto the perfect man. Which we haven't all come to yet.

And we still have them. Paul, John, Peter, Matthew, James.... They are still building up the body of Christ and equipping his people.

The apostles after the resurrection like Paul, Barnabas, Silvanus, Timotheus and perhaps Titus, were in a different ministration.

That is not true. Paul regarded himself just as much an apostle as the Twelve.
  • 2 Cor 11:5 "For I consider myself not in the least inferior to the most eminent apostles."
  • He associated himself himself with the Twelve 1 Cor 4:9 "God has put us apostles on display"
  • He appealed to his eye-witness status as evidence of his apostleship.
  • He performed miracles like the Twelve.
  • He wrote more scripture than all the others put together.
  • He was prepared to make a stand against Peter.
  • Like the twelve he did not receive the gospel from any man, but from Christ himself (Gal. 1:11-12)

And nowhere does it say these five fold gifts ceased.

Apostles and prophets were for the foundation of the church with Christ the cornerstone (Eph 2:20). Are we still laying the foundation of the church?
 
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian
Calling physical death a healing is one of the worst and cheapest forms of deception I have ever come across.
Nowhere in the scriptures do we find the Lord using that excuse.

Are we not cured of our sicknesses, pain and disabilities in heaven then?
 
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian
I quoted this verse from Mark earlier in the thread. SM said it was just a prediction and, of course, said it was questionable according to some versions....

I said it was a predictive prophecy, which was fulfilled in the 1st century. That's if it was really Mark talking. Virtually all bible scholars and commentators think it wasn't Mark.

HCSB, KJV and AMPC don't show it as being questionable. In truth this is a powerful prophecy, and it's a sure word.

HCSB and AMPC does. Their footnotes point out that v9-20 only appears in some manuscripts.
 
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian

Prophecy is the very words of God.

2 Peter 1:21: “No prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God.”

How can one word of God be any less authoritative than another word of God? Prophecy is just as authoritative and infallible as scripture.
 
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian

Did God speak actual words in English to pass on to Jane or was a feeling/thought that popped into your head?

(I know you won't give me a straight answer because I've asked you that question numerous times before. So I'll presume it is the latter.)
 
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian

The long ending may have first appeared around 170AD but that doesn't make it genuine. That was still a hundred years after the gospel was written. There were other endings circulating at the same time (5 in total), and the long ending was the rarest. In 320AD Eusebius said that that nearly all copies of Mark that he had seen lacked the long ending. Copies of Mark with the long ending only became more common much later.

The most damning evidence though is from the text itself. It is plainly an addition.

Bruce Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament

(a) The vocabulary and style of verses 9-20 are non-Markan. (e.g. απιστεω, βλαπτω, βεβαιοω, επακολουθεω, θεαομαι, μετα ταυτα, πορευομαι, συνεργεω, υστερον are found nowhere else in Mark; and θανασιμον and τοις μετ αυτου γενομενοις, as designations of the disciples, occur only here in the New Testament).

(b) The connection between ver. 8 and verses 9-20 is so awkward that it is difficult to believe that the evangelist intended the section to be a continuation of the Gospel. Thus, the subject of ver. 8 is the women, whereas Jesus is the presumed subject in ver. 9; in ver. 9 Mary Magdalene is identified even though she has been mentioned only a few lines before (15.47 and 16.1); the other women of verses 1-8 are now forgotten; the use of αναστας δε and the position of πρωτον are appropriate at the beginning of a comprehensive narrative, but they are ill-suited in a continuation of verses 1-8. In short, all these features indicate that the section was added by someone who knew a form of Mark that ended abruptly with ver. 8 and who wished to supply a more appropriate conclusion. In view of the inconcinnities between verses 1-8 and 9-20, it is unlikely that the long ending was composed ad hoc to fill up an obvious gap; it is more likely that the section was excerpted from another document, dating perhaps from the first half of the second century.

The internal evidence for the shorter ending (2) is decidedly against its being genuine. Besides containing a high percentage of non-Markan words, its rhetorical tone differs totally from the simple style of Mark's Gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,261
1,768
The land of OZ
✟345,780.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
First off you only have 1 vers with the word spirit even in it....???? Second, capitalization is not determined by the GREEK in that verse, or any other. ALL the oldest manuscript copies we have of the NT are either written in continuous lower case or continuous upper case. Every time a translator thought it should be capitalized he did. And many times in different translations there is disagreement. According to a study bible I have called the Companion bible they capitalized either spirit or holy spirit 52 times when it never should have been.

Having prefaced with that information, let me say this. In a book I have which deals with every verse in the NT with the word "spirit/pneuma" in it. The English theologian authoring the book was an acclaimed scholar as well as author of a number of theological books. And he says that in chapter 8 of Romans 'the Holy Spirit of God' is not even mentioned until verse 16. Your Rom 8:11 verse falls short of that. But I'll deal with your post's ONLY verse, which even has the word spirit in it. But first I'll just quote it from a translation which reads a bit different (with the bold being added by me).

CLT Rom 8:11 Now if the spirit of Him Who rouses Jesus from among the dead is making its home in you, He Who rouses Christ Jesus from among the dead will also be vivifying your mortal bodies because of His spirit making its home in you.

Now his books comment concerning your verse was this;
"And if the pneuma (i.e. the new nature from God, the article being used grammatically to identify this pneuma with what has been said about it in verses above) of him that raised up Jesus from among the dead is dwelling in you, He that raised up the Christ from among the dead will quicken your mortal bodies also, on account of His pneuma (i.e., tthe Divine Nature) that dwelleth in you."

He goes on to add that the A.V. (old KJV) had small 's' in both cases in verse 11, but that the R.V. has the first with a 's' and the second with 'S'.

The fact that it is the 'spirit of "Christ in you" which is "the hope of glory", or a risen glorified body', and NOT GOD'S Holy Spirit of glory which is UPON YOU' confirms this position also.

So, I've said all that to basically say you are still coming up short as to my demand for proof that 'the Holy Spirit of God' dwells in you instead of just 'the holy spirit of Christ' (if born anew).

Now I'll give you 5 verses to trump your 1 saying the Holy Spirit of God never dwelled in Jesus either, as well as 7 verses saying the same for us.

MAT 12:18 "Behold, my servant whom I have chosen, my beloved with whom my soul is well pleased. I will put my Spirit upon him,

LUK 3:22 and the Holy Spirit descended upon him in bodily form, as a dove,

LUK 4:18 "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor.

JOH 1:32 And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.


JOH 1:33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

Now scriptures pertaining to the Holy Spirit is not in us. Note with this first one, the inconsistency of 5 disagreeing translations in the 'infallible word of God' (according to most anyway).

KJV JOEL 2:29 Even upon the menservants and maidservants in those days, I will pour out my spirit.

NAS JOE 2:29 "Even on the male and female servants I will pour out My Spirit in those days.


"Spirit" = YLT, NIV NAS
"spirit" = KJV, RSV

LUK 2:25 Now there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. THIS WAS STILL THE OT AND SPEAKS OF THE SAME PLACEMENT THEN THAT WE HAVE AFTER PENTECOST.

ACT 1:8 But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you;


ACT 2:17 'And in the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh,

ACT 11:15 "And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them just as He did upon us at the beginning.

ACT 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came on them;

1PE 4:14 If you are reviled for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the Spirit of glory and of God rests on you.


NOW BEFORE ANYONE WANTS TO START QUOTING MORE VERSES SAYING I'M WRONG...REFUTE THESE SCRIPTURES FIRST. BECAUSE I CAN REFUTE ANY YOU 'THINK' STAND IN OPPOSITION TO THE TRUTH I'VE PRESENTED AND BELIEVE.
 
Upvote 0

Deborah D

Prayer Warrior
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
1,059
1,101
USA
✟247,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Did God speak actual words in English to pass on to Jane or was a feeling/thought that popped into your head?

(I know you won't give me a straight answer because I've asked you that question numerous times before. So I'll presume it is the latter.)

What are you talking about??? God speaks to me in the only language I'm fluent in, unlike your incessant nonsensical babble.
 
Upvote 0

swordsman1

Well-Known Member
May 3, 2015
3,941
1,074
✟303,548.00
Faith
Christian
paul didnt see The lord Jesus "in the flesh"
so that theories debunked before you started it.

1 Cor 15:5-8 He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. After that He appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep; then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles; and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also.

1 Cor 9:1 Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our Lord?
 
Upvote 0

Deborah D

Prayer Warrior
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
1,059
1,101
USA
✟247,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Not in my Bible!
 
Upvote 0

Alithis

Disciple of Jesus .
Nov 11, 2010
15,750
2,180
Mobile
✟109,492.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The lord jesus had ascended ... He saw him in glory shining with glory..After he had ascended.
That is not seeing him in flesh.
 
Reactions: Deborah D
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.