You utter defiance and faux-knowledge with your first words and use the skinny scapegoat of 'urban legends' as a way out.
My, my. Not just defiance, but
utter defiance. I seem to have touched a nerve. Skinny scapegoat and faux-knowledge? You do have a way with words, but - contrary to your claim - I don't require a way out.
You are, very simply, mistaken. There was no complaint. The apple did not strike him, which would have been grounds for the complaint. The only grounds involved were the grounds upon which the apple fell.
Nor, unless we use a very broad definition of the word, did it
inspire him to discover gravity. (I think anyone who has fallen down, or dropped a plate, has discovered gravity without the assistance of Newton.) What it did do, based upon his own words, was to prompt him to ask a question. Why do things fall in a straight line? And that led to him developing a theory of gravity.
As for convincing. I don't answer to you.
I didn't say that you did, but you posted your thoughts on apples on a public forum. Unless you are exercising hubris, the most reasonable explanation for that is that you wish to convince others of your view. I am simply performing the small service of pointing out that, so far, you aren't doing to well in that regard.
Now, if you don't like people disagreeing with you, perhaps you should avoid broadcsting your thoughts in public.
I'm trying to have a discussion.
And in a discussion it is quite normal and proper for participants to point out seeming errors in the arguments of others. That is an integral part of most discussions.
Politely, if this conversation offends you in any way then just don't join in, it's as simple as that
I've not been offended by anything you have said. My comments on your thoughts were offered as part of a discussion and were submitted politely. In contrast, your reply is far from polite. However, I find that more amusing than offensive, more puzzling than informative. So, carry on in that style if it makes you more comfortable.
My whole journey here is to figure out how to avoid such a mistake in the future and to try to narrow it down to specifics.
And yet the consensus view of the other participants in this thread is that your journey is based upon false premises. It might be more productive for you to consider that possibility than to be rude and dismissive to those who are trying to have a polite conversation with you.
Much in the way you can't smell music.
Absolutes are so dangerous. They are prone to mislead.
Synesthesia.