- Jul 22, 2014
- 41,685
- 7,903
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Once again, jason has misunderstood what Jesus was saying.
Well, such a response is typical. For in my many dealings with Eternal Security Proponents over the years, one tactic that is common among them is that smart remarks are made instead of bringing up a verse to support their belief and or a detailed counter argument with Scripture so as to address the passage I brought up so as to offer any kind of real context. Why? Because their belief is not actually founded on God's Word and therefore smart remarks is all they have to offer sometimes. In fact, I have had it where many of them have offered no Scripture at all and they just insulted me personally (Which does not help to prove they are on the side of the truth concerning God's Word).
FreeGrace2 said:Well, we get another glimpse of jason's theology. He doesn't believe that "all sin is paid for; past, present, and future". In black and white. This is just totally contrary to Scripture. It is clear that he fails to comprehend what "once for all" means in reference to Christ's sacrifice in Hebrews. It means He died for all sins. Not just some sins.
Nowhere does Scripture teach that future sin is paid for in either Hebrews or any other part of the Bible.
The Bible teaches that if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness (1 John 1:9). The common response by Eternal Security Proponents to 1 John 1:9 and other related passages is that it is dealing with some kind of so called "fellowship sin" (i.e. sins that cause a break in fellowship but not a loss of salvation). Just because the word "fellowship" appears in John's epistle does not mean that this so called "fellowship sin" exists. There is no verse in the Bible that specifically spells out what a fellowship sin actually is. The Bible does not distignuish betweeen fellowship sins (Which would be after believing) versus say sins dealing with salvation (Which would involve the new convert coming to the faith for the first time). But this whole "fellowship sin" concept is simply not true. For 1 John 1:7 says, "if we walk in the light as he is in the light the blood of Jesus Christ cleanses us from all sin." This cleansing is obviously in reference to how the blood cleanses us as a part of our salvation because the blood cleansing sin for our salvation can be seen elsewhere in Scripture. In addition, 1 John 3:15 lets us know that John's epistle is dealing with salvation because he says, "no murderer has eternal life abiding in him."
Anyways, the most popular passage that Eternal Security Proponents use to defend the idea that their future sin is forgiven them is Colossians 2:13-14 that says,
13 "And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, has he made alive together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;"
(Colossians 2:13-14).
14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;"
(Colossians 2:13-14).
Okay, when we read this passage, we have to realize that Jesus died for us before we were even a believer yet. Jesus is paying the price for all our sins so as to offer us the free gift that comes with certain conditions (i.e. one needs to have a true faith so as to access the saving grace of God). Nowhere does this passage say we are forgiven of all our sins before receiving the gift and nowhere does this passage say that all our sins (future sins) are forgiven if we receive such a gift. This merely means that Jesus paid the price for our sins so that He could be our substitute. So if we do faulter, we have His grace and mercy that we can go to so as to get right with the Lord. Nowhere does the Bible teach that we can just accept Christ or simply believe on Him and then move on with our lives as if nothing ever happened. Salvation changes a person's life. Not just half way or for the most part, but all the way. God totally transforms us from the inside out. Also, if you were to continue to keep reading into Colossians chapter 3, we see that that we are told to mortify or put away certain sins as believers. This is our responsibility as believers. We are told to put away sin in our lives. For Colossians 3 says the wrath of God abides on those who do such sins; And no mention is made of how the believer is exempt of the Wrath of God if they were to do these types of sins, ether.
As for Hebrews 10:10-12: Well, verse 14 says Christ perfects forever those who are Sanctified. This is the context of verses 10-12. Those who are Sanctified are those who have entered into the Sanctification process with God. For it is God's will and desire for you to be Sanctified or to be made holy (See 1 Thessalonians 4:3). For without holiness no man shall see the Lord (Hebrews 12:14). In fact, it those who do the will of the Father or the will of God (Who entered into the Sanctification Process) who are the ones who will enter into the Kingdom of God. For not everyone who says unto Jesus, Lord, Lord, will enter the Kingdom of God (Matthew 7:21). For the person who does not do what Jesus says is likened to a fool who built his house upon the sand whereby a storm came and destroyed it greatly (Matthew 7:26-27).
FreeGrace2 said:And again, he totally fails to understand the view of eternal security. There are very serious consequences to sin, but he just won't admit that is our view. Which seems dishonest to me. Why does he not believe what he's been told over and over? I guess he just loves to beat dead horses.
The Eternal Security Proponent believes that the believer being disciplined is God's version of punishing sin. But disciplining someone is not the same as punishing someone. Remember, God only chastens those in whom are His children and not those who are bastard sons. Those who are bastard sons do not care to be reformed or to be changed in any way in this life. They can generally live a holy life and think they are serving God but yet they get to keep one or two sins in their life (if they so choose) because they do not believe a true believer will ever stop sinning here in this life. So they give themselves an excuse to remain in their sins (When they can choose to fight against their sin and overcome it with God's help).
FreeGrace2 said:Stupid question. Go find a believer who is being disciplined and ask him.
For the Eternal Security Proponent, it doesn't matter if they have been disciplined supposedly by one sin. They still believe they will have some kind of sin the rest of their life. So discipline does not really help to reform them in any way. Maybe one or two sins, but not all sin. So they can continue in some kind of evil in this life. So discipline is useless because no true reform over their sin and a proper attitude of being against sin and striving to overcome it will ever take place. Besides, I do not see any great testimonies coming forth by Eternal Security Proponents of how they have been disciplined by God to stop sinning certain types of sins. Why should they? They believe they can sin and still be saved. So it really doesn't matter if they ultimately stop sinning certain types of sin in this life or not. They believe they will forever sin in this life or they teach that no sin can separate them from God. Hence, why sin is minimized by the Eternal Security Proponent's belief.
FreeGrace2 said:jason himself has admitted that he hasn't yet achieved sinless perfection, and he has said that he is saved. That is a contradiction to his own views. He rejects "sin and still be saved", yet he still sins and he claims to be saved. His views are internally contradicted.
Those who believe in Sinless Perfectionism is like the alcoholic who stumbles on his road to recovery in being sober. The Eternal Security Proponent will focus on their stumble in the present moment not seeing that they will overcome their addiction to alcohol one day. So they whisper in the alcoholics ear and say, "take another sip" and "you cannot do it." In other words, it is sort of like them saying, "we are all drunks or alcoholics and we can never stop drinking (sinning) in this life." "Maybe one day when we die we will stop being alcoholics."
Jason0047 said:Sin is minimized in the Eternal Security belief.FreeGrace2 said:jason has been corrected on this point over and over, but he is either too thick to comprehend or he prefers to keep on lying about the views of others.
Again, the Eternal Security Proponent believes that discipline is an effective means of meeting justice and that it does not minimize sin. But see, what does it matter to a Eternal Security Proponent if they are disciplined and they still want to sin? They could just still sin and still be saved and think to themselves that even unbelievers go thru the same challenges in this life. So discipline is not really an effective deterrent in getting the believer to stop sinning certain sins in this life (if that is really what they want to do). Besides, what does it matter if the believer stops one or two sins if they are still doing other kinds of evil? For most (not all) Eternal Security Proponents deny Sinless Perfectionism or that one can stop sinning in this life.
FreeGrace2 said:Perfect justice only occurs in God's system. He is perfectly just. And He judged His own Son for the sins of mankind. But jason doesn't seem to understand this very basic doctrine.
While it is true that Jesus died for all mankind's sins, this was only so as to offer mankind the free gift and the conditions that come with keeping that gift. Nowhere is all of mankind forgiven and saved the moment Jesus died on the cross and was risen. Man has to act in receiving His gift and in maintaining it.
FreeGrace2 said:In jason's belief system, justice is what he thinks it is. iow, what satisfies his sense (warped as it is) of justice. Oh, and, btw, his belief system has no grace in it.
Grace does not give the believer a license to sin or to think they can die in unrepentant sin and still be saved. Grace is not grace if one is still enslaved to their sin in some way. For Jesus Christ was manifested to destroy the works of the devil (See 1 John 3:8).
FreeGrace2 said:This is true, but jason doesn't understand how it does. When we sin, we grieve (Eph 4:30) or quench (1 Thess 5:19) the Holy Spirit. Sin breaks fellowship with God, just as the prodigal son was physically separated from his father in rebellion. Only when the son confessed his sin and repented of them by returning to his father was fellowship restored.
If I say I quenched a fire, it means I put the fire out (Which is usually done with water). If I say I quenched my thirst, that means I satisfied my thirst. In other words, if a person says they quenched the Spirit, that means the Spirit is no longer with them. Also, the Eternal Security Proponent seems to be forgetting that only those who labor for the food that does not perish is the one in whom God the Father has set his seal upon, too (See John 6:27). So their misuse of the Scripture in Ephesians does not hold water.
Jason0047 said:1 John 3:15 says no murderer has eternal life abiding in themFreeGrace2 said:And he doesn't understand the meaning of "abiding" in that verse.
Another common tactic by Eternal Security Proponents is that they do not actually explain clearly what they mean when they discuss a verse or passage that is brought up. So instead of a detailed explanation with Scripture, an attack against my character is made and a cryptic response is made (As if that helped to prove their case in any way).
....
Last edited:
Upvote
0