And you think the people who wrote Concordances (with an attached Lexicon) had grown up reading and speaking Biblical Greek during Biblical times? Do you believe these people lived during the times of the apostle Paul? How do you know they are not wrong in their interpretation from over the many years that have passed after that language was no longer in use anymore?
No. A person re-hashing what some person believes that languages says is not the same thing as a person who actually grew up in that time period speaking and writing that language and who would no doubt correct the scholars of this day and age for falsely misunderstanding the Bible in what it says.
Jesus said beware of the Scribes. A scribe is a person who trans-SCRIBES the Word. Who would be the Scribes of today? It would be the scholars of our day. Should we not be testing everything they say, especially if Jesus said to beware of the Scribes?
I can say the same for you. But that is not a real answer or refutation of knowing what the Hebrew and Greek says by knowing what the Word plainly says in your own language.
I am very familar with 2 Timothy 2:15 and I believe what it says. But nowhere does it mention the Greek as a requirement in studying the Word, though. That is an assumption you are placing upon the text that is not there.
In fact, the thing is that by what you have said to me so far, you are giving me the impression that you do not completely believe 2 Timothy 2:15. How so? Well, the verse says to study to show yourself APPROVED unto God. But according to OSAS, or Eternal Security, you are already "approved" by God. There is nothing more you can do to be "approved" by Him. Your belief in Jesus is all you need to be right with Him. At least that is the impression I get when I have talked with you and others in regards to Eternal Security. Is that true? If not, then please explain using the Word of God, my friend.
In Acts chapter 2, God was able to communicate to people in their own tongue and language. It is silly to assume God has changed in regards to doing that (See
Acts 2:4-13). For in verse 4, it says they were filled with the Holy Spirit and they spake with other tongues (
Acts 2:4).
"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" (2 Timothy 3:16).
God is not a respecter of persons. He would make things equal for all men of different time periods. In other words, you are saying that the men who did not have these Lexicons available to them by way of the internet in the past would just be out of luck in understanding God's Word. I don't believe that. The Scriptures say that the Spirit can guide a believer into all truth. This would be all believers thru out all time (Regardless if they had a Lexicon or not).
His Word does not change even if His Word is spoken in another language. This is evident by what happened at Pentecost in Acts chapter 2.
There is no need to be insulting. In fact, by saying something like this, it only helps to weaken your argument and not to prove it to be true in any way. For God's people are supposed to speak in a loving manner and we are not to hurl insults at each other.
Uh, not every poor person can afford the internet or Concordances with attached Lexicons. Some barely have enough money to put food on the table some months.
This is not an example that helps to prove your case in any way. Nowhere does James 3:2 suggest a negative thing in relation to the word "perfect." It mentions a positive thing in relation to the word "perfect." For it says the man who does not offend in word is a perfect man.
Lexicons with an attached Concordance are not actually divinely inspired Scripture. It is merely a commentary or the opinion of some men of what they think the Word of God actually says. James Strong and his buddies did not write divinely inspired Scripture....