- Nov 26, 2019
- 15,515
- 8,178
- 50
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Generic Orthodox Christian
- Marital Status
- Celibate
Brother, what is clear is that all three are “Spirit.”
Jesus replied, “Believe me, dear woman, the time is coming when it will no longer matter whether you worship the Father on this mountain or in Jerusalem. You Samaritans know very little about the one you worship, while we Jews know all about him, for salvation comes through the Jews. But the time is coming—indeed it’s here now—when true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and in truth. The Father is looking for those who will worship him that way. For God is Spirit, so those who worship him must worship in spirit and in truth.” (John 4:21-24 NLT)
When Paul uses the word "Spirit" alone, translators should not force him to refer to the Holy Spirit by adding the word "holy" before "Spirit," since this imposition of the Holy Spirit's identity is not found in God's original message, as the prophets guarantee. Paul tells us in context that he refers to Jesus as the "Spirit" in the following passage.
But whenever someone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. For the Lord (Jesus) is the Spirit (Jesus), and wherever the Spirit of the Lord is (us modeling Jesus' obedience), there is freedom (from sin). So all of us who have had that veil (Judaism's disobedience) removed can see and reflect the glory of the Lord (full obedience to the Ten Commandments). And the Lord (Jesus)—who is the Spirit (Jesus)—makes us more and more like him as we are changed into his glorious image (us modeling Jesus' obedience). (2 Corinthians 3:16-18 NLT overlaid with commentary)
United in our hope for the soon return of Jesus, Jorge
But the Nicene Creed declares that the Holy Spirit is the Lord and Giver of Life, (it also uses the title Lord to refer to Jesus Christ, so clearly within the Christian faith the word Lord can refer to any person of the Holy Trinity) so again, how do you reconcile your unusual interpretaiton of St. Paul with the Nicene Creed?
Furthermore, our primary source of information about how St. Paul became an Apostle comes from the Gospel According to St. Luke, and St. Luke was known to be the protege of St. Paul, so the idea that St. Paul would use terminology inconsistent with St. Luke and St. John seems particularly problematic.
Upvote
0