The Lord of the vineyard certainly did grind them to dust in 70 AD
So you acknowledge that no eye saw him come when you claim he came.
Revelation 1:7 KJV: Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.
Not one eye saw he come.
Case closed.
There is one thing for sure. You will not be given a single sign of his coming because you believe they've all be fulfilled.
You have nothing to watch for at all.
Nice try... Address Isaiah 52:10?
Who saw God's Physical arm? where is the Historical evidence?
If you have none, then yes, case closed. Just not the way you'd hoped.
He never came in 70 AD. That's your fallacy.So, your belief is that the events of 70AD came to pass at "The Coming of the Lord"?
Seems we're not so far apart after all
Proverbs 13:12
Hope deferred makes the heart sick, but desire fulfilled is a tree of life.
I'll take the tree of life of my fulfilled desire over the sick heart of your deferred hope, every day.
Case closed - but not in the way you hoped.Nice try... Address Isaiah 52:10?
Who saw God's Physical arm?
Where is the Historical evidence of it being seen by every eye of every human in every nation back then??
If you have none, then yes, case closed. Just not the way you'd hoped.
Facts are,....
Case closed - but not in the way you hoped.
Case closed because the authority of scripture stands forever, but your misinterpretation of scripture (so much of scripture) falls like the walls of Jericho and the walls of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
Yes I gave you an answer.So you have no answer. Duly Noted.
It's impossible to argue with someone who has re-written scripture by misapplying almost every verse. Continue to be drunk on your false claims, your bending and twisting of one portion of scripture after another, because you are going to sober up very quickly when Christ returns - but then it will be too late. You probably won't take part in that resurrection called "the first resurrection" by Christ in His Revelation to His churches.So you have no answer. Duly Noted.
He never came in 70 AD. That's your fallacy.
Your fantasy-world is truly bizarre to me, to be honest.
Haha hardly.Yes I gave you an answer.
So much for your fairy tales.
No. You're drunk on the lies you believe. There is no wisdom in arguing forever and a day with someone who's as drunk as you are. Case closed.You Just said He did in your Post #513
Then Address my Post #529 above and demonstrate how and why my interpretation of those passages is "Bizarre and in error", and be sure to provide your alternate "correct" interpretation of them for us to examine.
You can take you ball and leave the sandbox if you cant stand the heat...No. You're drunk on the lies you believe. There is no wisdom in arguing forever and a day with someone who's as drunk as you are. Case closed.
Haha hardly.
Show me the physical evidence from History of Gods actual, physical arm being "seen by the eyes of all nations"
Soon has a lot of meaning in my view.
If you are ready to die, is that soon, or will you prepare in an elected year of your choosing?
I didn't claim the nations saw his arm. You did.
Actually Isaiah Did.
Do you believe Him or don't you?
If you believe Isaiah, then you believe Gods Actual Arm WAS SEEN by every Eye of every person in every nation... I suppose if you don't believe Isaiah, then you don't believe God's arm was seen.
Which is it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?