Super Spreading events now seen as primary way Coronavirus spreads

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,255.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We've known when many people from many households are close together for a long time, that 1 person can spread the virus to many others. (Even before stay at home orders, states began by timidly limiting crowd sizes to 500, then eventually 50, then finally numbers like 10.)

But it's now seen that most of the spread happens at "super spreader events", and often then individuals bring the virus home and spread it to their housemates/family.

This isn't going shopping in a grocery though! It's quite unlike that.

In late February about 175 executives from around the world came to the biotechnology company Biogen’s leadership conference in Boston. Over two days, attendees shook hands, talked among themselves and shared meals. Also in attendance: the new coronavirus. Several people at the event were unknowingly infected with the microbe that causes COVID-19, and it quickly spread among others there, who then brought it home. At least 99 people ended up sick in Massachusetts alone.

Around the same time, the coronavirus was spreading among more than 100 people who went to a funeral in Albany, Ga. sparking an outbreak that soon led to the surrounding rural county posting one of the nation’s highest cumulative incidences... The next month a single individual with the disease infected 52 people during a two-and-a-half-hour choir practice in Washington State. Two people died. In Arkansas, an infected pastor and his wife passed the virus on to more than 30 attendees at church events over the course of a few days, leading to at least three deaths. And these new cases spread to 26 more people, at least one of whom died.

As scientists have learned more about COVID-19, it has become clear that so-called superspreader incidents—in which one person infects a disproportionate number of other individuals—have played an oversized role in the transmission of the virus that causes the disease. The Boston conference and the funeral in Georgia were among several superspreader events ...

In fact, research on actual cases, as well as models of the pandemic, indicate that between 10 and 20 percent of infected people are responsible for 80 percent of the coronavirus’s spread.

How ‘Superspreading’ Events Drive Most COVID-19 Spread


"Following a birthday party in Texas on May 30, one man reportedly infected 17 members of his family with the coronavirus.

Reading reports like these, you might think of the virus as a wildfire, instantly setting off epidemics wherever it goes. But other reports tell another story altogether.

In Italy, for example, scientists looked at stored samples of wastewater for the earliest trace of the virus. Last week they reported that the virus was in Turin and Milan as early as Dec. 18. But two months would pass before northern Italy’s hospitals began filling with victims of Covid-19. So those December viruses seem to have petered out.

As strange as it may seem, these reports don’t contradict each other. Most infected people don’t pass on the coronavirus to someone else. But a small number pass it on to many others in so-called superspreading events.
...
...If Covid-19 was like the flu, you’d expect the outbreaks in different places to be mostly the same size. But Dr. Kucharski and his colleagues found a wide variation. The best way to explain this pattern, they found, was that 10 percent of infected people were responsible for 80 percent of new infections. Which meant that most people passed on the virus to few, if any, others.
...
A lot of transmission seems to happen in a narrow window of time starting a couple days after infection, even before symptoms emerge. If people aren’t around a lot of people during that window, they can’t pass it along.

And certain places seem to lend themselves to superspreading. A busy bar, for example, is full of people talking loudly. Any one of them could spew out viruses without ever coughing. And without good ventilation, the viruses can linger in the air for hours.

A study from Japan this month found clusters of coronavirus cases in health care facilities, nursing homes, day care centers, restaurants, bars, workplaces, and musical events such as live concerts and karaoke parties.

Most People With Coronavirus Won’t Spread It. Why Do a Few Infect Many?


The key takeaway:

Since most transmission happens only in a small number of similar situations, it may be possible to come up with smart strategies to stop them from happening. It may be possible to avoid crippling, across-the-board lockdowns by targeting the superspreading events.

“By curbing the activities in quite a small proportion of our life, we could actually reduce most of the risk,” said Dr. Kucharski.

Most People With Coronavirus Won’t Spread It. Why Do a Few Infect Many?
 

JohnDB

Regular Member
May 16, 2007
4,256
1,289
nashville
✟53,921.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
South Korea I'm sure has a lot of information about contact tracing.
They don't care about your privacy...at all.

But this article is great about showing how one individual who doesn't wear a mask, doesn't believe that Covid-19 is real, is all about their personal rights can kill a lot of people.
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
6,193
1,971
✟177,142.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Super-spreading whilst symptomatic implies prioritising personal freedom above the social obligation of deliberately preventing transmission, (IMO).
Asymptomatic spreading, whilst untested or taking protective measures, implies the same, (IMO).
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,262
8,058
✟326,754.00
Faith
Atheist
But it's now seen that most of the spread happens at "super spreader events", and often then individuals bring the virus home and spread it to their housemates/family.

This isn't going shopping in a grocery though! It's quite unlike that.
That depends on the grocery store. A spacious, well-ventilated supermarket with social distancing controls is relatively safe. A small, poorly ventilated store, with narrow aisles where social distancing is difficult, is a risk.

The major risk factors are, being indoors; talking loudly, shouting, singing, or exercising; crowding and/or not social distancing, and poor or recirculated ventilation... especially while not wearing masks.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,255.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That depends on the grocery store. A spacious, well-ventilated supermarket with social distancing controls is relatively safe. A small, poorly ventilated store, with narrow aisles where social distancing is difficult, is a risk.

The major risk factors are, being indoors; talking loudly, shouting, singing, or exercising; crowding and/or not social distancing, and poor or recirculated ventilation... especially while not wearing masks.
The excerpts above are quite useful to illustrate the 'super spreader events' that are being pointed to, and help us see that there are degrees of risk in various situations, but that something more precise has been figured out of use. That certain precise kinds of situations are just far more important for spreading the virus in actual spread. And we get the interesting implication at the bottom of the 2nd excerpt (in post #1 at the end). It could help the U.S. a lot to get the best possible precautions without a total shutdown when possible to be more surgical.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,196
9,204
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,159,255.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The denial of the need to protect the source of personal freedoms never ceases to amaze me.
Freedom -- most people are thinking about whether they might catch the virus, and they are personally choosing, themselves, what to do, what precautions to take.

So, when the government, like a state or local city, issues a mandate like mask wearing, to try to prevent a massive spread of the virus and large numbers of deaths a month or 2 later -- it's public safety measure. Voters can then evaluate that in the next election.

Most people want the government to do public safety measures that are reasonable, and do them well, and not in an incompetent way, nor a heavy handed way, but a best way.

So, when your state requires auto insurance, it's something that voters over time have chosen as the best overall policy, that there be a requirement of auto insurance. That's so if someone runs into your car, there will be an ability to cover the costs.
 
Upvote 0