• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Submission.

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟251,695.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Your church as described above does not fit the definition of One or Holy that you gave us.

The RC Denomination does not, no. Which is just one reason why I don't agree with a few Catholics who change the ancient creed to be about the singular RC Denomination.

Yes, the Christian communion is one, holy and catholic. Your denomination is not (in spite of the silly legal moniker). The creed is correct, how some Catholics modify it is not.



To the issue, see post # 3.



- Josiah
 
Upvote 0

katerinah1947

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2015
4,690
805
✟103,630.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Did Paul ever tell anyone not to submit to Peter's authority?

....Don't know. Why are you asking that, when I have not broached that subject of authority yet. Do you think when I bring up right and wrong, that I am speaking of an esoteric authotity subject? Are we to submit to every authority in the chuch, when they are like us also, making mistakes in sin......

...In a way yes. In another way no. Paul resisted, Paul should have in the authority issue, just done what Peter was now proposing, or was in fact doing. He did not do that. Rather, he stated his obkections.......

Was Peter telling others that they should act as he did?
...It's in acts. What did he do? And why do i need to know this here for what I have said above? .....

Regarding authority, it is written that if your brother sins, you should go talk to him, if he persists, you should bring others to talk to him, and if he continues, to bring it to the Church.
..... Uh. You should bring another. And if that with that other, he continues to do so, you are to treat him as a tax collector, for you have lost a brother. You have lost your brother. I have lost two of my both kinds of brothers this way. ......

The Church is the authority, not any one man.
..... The church appears as solo to most of us. ......

While priests, bishops, cardinals, and popes can be wrong, the authority we're speaking of is regarding faith and morals, and we are to submit to The Church in these matters.
....In Galileo's case those exact words were used, and the Pope still issued the command against him. They could have told him merely, please you must be quiet until your idea is proven. He did not of course, but they put in that judgement that it is they who understand scripture. I think even faith and morals might have been in there. The point here is the church, as we call that institution, is not right all of the time, when they appear and tacilty say they are right, or when we are told they are right, by ill informed priests, changing by accident what the church aslo says. I, and you must resist some of the time, when what we are being told seems wrong, and we can back it up with proof. ......

One other comment, I've seen some pretty poor priests, but never the degree that you're suggesting.
.... And why are you telling me this? Why? ......

I've turned priests in for gambling, for simony, for improper shepherding, I've left parishes where the pastor didn't seem quite right, but wow! I wonder where you are???
..... Again. What do you mean? I have even worked with ministers who are wrong. I have worked with priests who are right, and only needed to know somethings. Why are you asking me this? .....

Maybe LA?
...... My address is given above. Yes I move much. LA, not once, yet. .....

BTW, the Inquisition was not wrong.
.... Okay ....

Some individuals did wrong in the name of the Inquisition.
.....Yes......

Also, there are thousands of Catholics who think we should ordain women,
.... The bible disagrees. Jesus disagrees in His talk with Faustina. Paul disagrees in the Bible, so yes it is said, and in my case, it is ever so true. ....

allow divorced and remarried people into communion
..... And in most cases, like you have I have mentioned, it is not what God says, as some marriages that are, never were in God's eyes. We humans, don't know all God thinks, and feels, thus we apply a rule incorrectly. Some of the time we are right. To say that all remaried Caholics cannot receieve communiion is wrong. Also, know this: "There is more than one way to be in Communion, with Jesus, and therefore....God."

and not be so harsh on birth control and abortion.
.... I didn't know you were harsh. .....

Should the Church listen to them?
....When you killed your last person by being angry with them, should you be treated as they are who abort out of love, and teror, or out of lies told by others? You kill every person you get angry with, so says God. Abortion is not your issue, unless you are female, I would think. I have never heard of a man, ever morning the son he never had, and never knew about. The mother always knows. She always grieves. She always misses the child that she had killed out of desperation, or for what ever reason. Do men feel that? Why should they. It is not their job? They have other jobs, one is to fight every wrong statement, made by your priests, bishops, and even your pope, who said those words in print, to Galileo, and to us. They know more thag Galileo does on Scripture. He is wrong. You can argue all day, but read the words they used. .....

Hi,
Some thoughts. And no I am not angry. I am not.
LOVE,
...Me.,
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟72,848.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
So the Anglicans don't have apostolic succession? The Scandanavian Lutherans? The Eastern Orthodox?

Just because the pope sits in Rome doesn't make him the true successor to St. Peter, let alone all the apostles.

I think it is best to let the Catholic Church say who she accepts as having valid holy orders and hence apostolic succession. So even though individual Catholics may say that Anglicans definitely do not have valid orders it is better to consult official Catholic sources for answers to this question because the question is complicated by many matters.
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟251,695.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Originally Posted by barryatlake Josiah, are you saying Jesus never formed His church on His apostles



In a sense.... but He didn't form any denomination.


I realize, in order to demand that SELF is the unmitigated DICTATOR to which all must docilicly submit (like a private to a general), exempt from accountability, then that self MUST make SELF as big as possible, as special as possible, as unique as possible.... must both hide from the light AND build around self huge, thick, tall walls of egoism, self-centeredness, uniqueness.... virtual divinity. Have you studied any of the "cults?" The early LDS? See post # 3.


"Church" does not have the definition of "Egotistical, self-centered, power-hungry DENOMINATION." It means.... US.

A denomination can't be holy in the sense of forgiven because only people can be forgiven, not a legal-geo-political-economic instititution. A denomination cannot be seen (such are invisible) but people can be seen, love can be seen.


No denomination is "catholic" since none currently has officially enrolled ALL (but ONLY) Christians - past and present, across the continents and centuries. Heck, the RC Denomination only even (absurdly!) CLAIMS about half of the Christians alive just now (hardly "catholic"). No denomination can be "catholic."





"And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came up to him and said to him, “Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.” And he said to them, “What do you want me to do for you?” And they said to him, “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.” Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or to be baptized with the baptism with which I am baptized?” And they said to him, “We are able.” And Jesus said to them, “The cup that I drink you will drink, and with the baptism with which I am baptized, you will be baptized, but to sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared.” And when the ten heard it, they began to be indignant at James and John. And Jesus called them to him and said to them, “You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:35-45 ESV)



Thank you.


Pax


- Josiah
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟251,695.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
Josiah said:


In a sense.... but He didn't form any denomination (RCC or LDS or any other; once existing or still existing).


I realize, in order to demand that SELF is the unmitigated DICTATOR to which all must docilicly submit (like a private to a general), exempt from accountability, then that self MUST make SELF as big as possible, as special as possible, as unique as possible.... must both hide from the light AND build around self huge, thick, tall walls of egoism, self-centeredness, uniqueness.... virtual divinity. Have you studied any of the "cults?" The early LDS? See post # 3.


"Church" does not have the definition of "Egotistical, self-centered, power-hungry DENOMINATION." It means.... US.

A denomination can't be holy in the sense of forgiven because only people can be forgiven, not a legal-geo-political-economic instititution. A denomination cannot be seen (such are invisible) but people can be seen, love can be seen.


No denomination is "catholic" since none currently has officially enrolled ALL (but ONLY) Christians - past and present, across the continents and centuries. Heck, the RC Denomination only even (absurdly!) CLAIMS about half of the Christians alive just now (hardly "catholic"). No denomination can be "catholic."




"And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came up to him and said to him, “Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.” And he said to them, “What do you want me to do for you?” And they said to him, “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.” Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or to be baptized with the baptism with which I am baptized?” And they said to him, “We are able.” And Jesus said to them, “The cup that I drink you will drink, and with the baptism with which I am baptized, you will be baptized, but to sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared.” And when the ten heard it, they began to be indignant at James and John. And Jesus called them to him and said to them, “You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:35-45 ESV)



.


I wonder why CaliforniaJosiah constantly turns threads into attacks on the Catholic Church.


READ the post. Your denomination isn't even mentioned.


And is it rude to speak of others in the third person, as if they are absent?



.
 
Upvote 0
G

GratiaCorpusChristi

Guest
I think it is best to let the Catholic Church say who she accepts as having valid holy orders and hence apostolic succession. So even though individual Catholics may say that Anglicans definitely do not have valid orders it is better to consult official Catholic sources for answers to this question because the question is complicated by many matters.

GAH! You changed your font. And your image!
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟72,848.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I love the Crucifix of San Daminano. I have a 24" one in the foyer of my home.

St Francis pray for us.

I like it too in part because it has the witnesses to the risen Christ depicted in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdudgeon
Upvote 0

stevenfrancis

Disciple
Dec 28, 2012
956
246
69
United States
Visit site
✟64,600.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So the Anglicans don't have apostolic succession? The Scandanavian Lutherans? The Eastern Orthodox?

Just because the pope sits in Rome doesn't make him the true successor to St. Peter, let alone all the apostles.

I'm not even going to pretend to know about "Scandanavian Lutherans", but the Church recognizes several others churches which have maintained Apostolic succession, therefore maintaining valid Holy Orders, and therefore maintaining valid consecration of the Holy Eucharist.

Some of the ones I do know are Eastern Orthodox in all their branches. The Eastern Catholic rites, (which, while retaining the EO liturgy, and calendar, also submit to the see of St. Peter in matters of morals and faith), and various strains of Anglican communion, (this one's a little of mixed bag at this time, if I understand it correctly. That is some Bishops are of valid Holy Orders, and some are not, and so some lines of Apostolic succession are broken.
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟251,695.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I'm not even going to pretend to know about "Scandanavian Lutherans", but the Church recognizes several others churches which have maintained Apostolic succession, therefore maintaining valid Holy Orders, and therefore maintaining valid consecration of the Holy Eucharist.

Some of the ones I do know are Eastern Orthodox in all their branches. The Eastern Catholic rites, (which, while retaining the EO liturgy, and calendar, also submit to the see of St. Peter in matters of morals and faith), and various strains of Anglican communion, (this one's a little of mixed bag at this time, if I understand it correctly. That is some Bishops are of valid Holy Orders, and some are not, and so some lines of Apostolic succession are broken.


The RCC does NOT call on all to submit/obey the Anglican Communion or the Church of Sweden or even the Greek Orthodox Church. It calls on all to submit/obey ITSELF alone as God Himself. CCC 87, etc., etc.




Pax


- Josiah
 
Upvote 0

tz620q

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2007
2,748
1,102
Carmel, IN
✟794,158.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm not even going to pretend to know about "Scandanavian Lutherans", but the Church recognizes several others churches which have maintained Apostolic succession, therefore maintaining valid Holy Orders, and therefore maintaining valid consecration of the Holy Eucharist.

Some of the ones I do know are Eastern Orthodox in all their branches. The Eastern Catholic rites, (which, while retaining the EO liturgy, and calendar, also submit to the see of St. Peter in matters of morals and faith), and various strains of Anglican communion, (this one's a little of mixed bag at this time, if I understand it correctly. That is some Bishops are of valid Holy Orders, and some are not, and so some lines of Apostolic succession are broken.

Yeah, 20 years ago there was hope that the Anglican orders could be viewed as licit by the Catholic Church. Pope John Paul II had a commission checking into how to do this. Unfortunately, this was about the time that some Anglican communities started ordaining women and practising homosexuals. That pretty much dynamited the effort of the commission.
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟72,848.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Yeah, 20 years ago there was hope that the Anglican orders could be viewed as licit by the Catholic Church. Pope John Paul II had a commission checking into how to do this. Unfortunately, this was about the time that some Anglican communities started ordaining women and practising homosexuals. That pretty much dynamited the effort of the commission.

A number of Anglican groups do not ordain women or active homosexual men.
 
Upvote 0

concretecamper

I stand with Candace
Nov 23, 2013
7,752
3,028
PA
✟373,162.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The RCC does NOT call on all to submit/obey the Anglican Communion or the Church of Sweden or even the Greek Orthodox Church. It calls on all to submit/obey ITSELF alone as God Himself. CCC 87, etc., etc.




Pax


- Josiah

I was at Mass this morning and the reading was this. Reminded me of this comment and the attitude reflected in post #3. We all know through the great Apostle Paul that Christ and His Church are One. This reading spoke to me so I thought I would share it.


Reading 1 Wis 2:1a, 12-22

The wicked said among themselves,
thinking not aright:
“Let us beset the just one, because he is obnoxious to us;
he sets himself against our doings,
Reproaches us for transgressions of the law
and charges us with violations of our training.
He professes to have knowledge of God
and styles himself a child of the LORD.
To us he is the censure of our thoughts;
merely to see him is a hardship for us,
Because his life is not like that of others,
and different are his ways.
He judges us debased;
he holds aloof from our paths as from things impure.
He calls blest the destiny of the just
and boasts that God is his Father.
Let us see whether his words be true;
let us find out what will happen to him.
For if the just one be the son of God, he will defend him
and deliver him from the hand of his foes.
With revilement and torture let us put him to the test
that we may have proof of his gentleness
and try his patience.
Let us condemn him to a shameful death;
for according to his own words, God will take care of him.”
These were their thoughts, but they erred;
for their wickedness blinded them,
and they knew not the hidden counsels of God;
neither did they count on a recompense of holiness
nor discern the innocent souls’ reward.
 
Upvote 0

CaliforniaJosiah

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 6, 2005
17,496
1,568
✟251,695.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
concretecamper said:
Josiah said:
I realize, in order to demand that SELF is the unmitigated DICTATOR to which all must docilicly submit (like a private to a general), exempt from accountability, then that self MUST make SELF as big as possible, as special as possible, as unique as possible.... must both hide from the light AND build around self huge, thick, tall walls of egoism, self-centeredness, uniqueness.... virtual divinity. Have you studied any of the "cults?" The early LDS? See post # 3.



"Church" does not have the definition of "Egotistical, self-centered, power-hungry DENOMINATION." It means.... US.


A denomination can't be holy in the sense of forgiven because only people can be forgiven, not a legal-geo-political-economic instititution. A denomination cannot be seen (such are invisible) but people can be seen, love can be seen.


No denomination is "catholic" since none currently has officially enrolled ALL (but ONLY) Christians - past and present, across the continents and centuries. Heck, the RC Denomination only even (absurdly!) CLAIMS about half of the Christians alive just now (hardly "catholic"). No denomination can be "catholic."





Jesus said....

"And James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came up to him and said to him, “Teacher, we want you to do for us whatever we ask of you.” And he said to them, “What do you want me to do for you?” And they said to him, “Grant us to sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your glory.” Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you are asking. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, or to be baptized with the baptism with which I am baptized?” And they said to him, “We are able.” And Jesus said to them, “The cup that I drink you will drink, and with the baptism with which I am baptized, you will be baptized, but to sit at my right hand or at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared.” And when the ten heard it, they began to be indignant at James and John. And Jesus called them to him and said to them, “You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:35-45 ESV)




.




I was at Mass this morning and the reading was this. Reminded me of this comment and the attitude reflected in post #3.



Yes, this obsession the RC Denomination has with submission to it itself, obedience to it itself, the unmitigated POWER and CONTROL and LORDSHIP of it itself over all (as the Gentiles do), yes - it does seem to be the antithesis of what Jesus said.

Yes, that is reflected in my comments in post # 3.



Thank you.


Pax


- Josiah
 
Upvote 0