• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Spanking

lin1235

Jana's mommy!
Mar 29, 2005
2,876
248
48
Cape Town, South Africa
✟4,295.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
My word... what a long, long, long, old thread!

I'm unlikely to spank & I am very uncomfortable with it here's why. My mother spanked me from about 2 to 9 years of age. When I was young it was with a paddlle and eventually I graduated to a bamboo stick which she named Mr. Persuader. Other physical discipline included slaps and pulled ears. My mother never broke the skin or bruised me - nothing she did could be called physically abusive, but guess what, I was terrifed of my mother when I was young & then I began to hate her. It wasn't her so much as it was my personality. For me, implement or not, there was no separation from the punishment and my mother. I was terrified of her, of angering her, of disappointing her or of embarrassing her. Prior to punishment I would be sent to my room to wait - she made sure I knew what was coming so I could stew. I was usually in near hysterics by the time she came in, and I am sure she thought it was merely manipulative tears - but it wasn't. I was then stripped naked and placed over her lap. If I managed to wriggle away - she could still swat a leg. There was no predetermined number of swats - she stopped when she knew there had been "enough". When I understood what persuade meant - I thought she was sick. At some point I realized that I was so angry at her that if she ever so much as slapped me again I would probably strike her back before I'd have time to stop myself. I told her & luckily she saw I was serious and never hit me again.
If you are wondering- I no longer hate my mother, I love her very much and realize she just did as best she knew how. The reality is, my mother made the mistake that lots of parents make - she saw me as merely an extension of herself. She failed to see my actual personality as a child. She thought I would react to things the way she did, but I was wired differently. I honestly don't understand anyone who says that they will spank, cause it was good for them & it's good for most kids - so it will be good for theirs. At least wait until you have a child and determine the appropriate discipline for their nature.

This is similar to my experience. I was spanked very often as a child - in fact, I don't really remember any other form of discipline when I was a young child. I got my last spanking when I was 14 or 15, if I remember correctly. IMO, that's WAY too late! I can also remember my dad giving me the option of a spanking or losing TV priviledges when I was about 10, and I chose the spanking because it's over quickly. I was afraid of my dad for years and years - our relationship has only really healed in the last 5 years or so. He was a threat to me, and I have no doubt that spanking was at least partly to blame. For those who wonder, he spanked with a belt (never with his hands), and never in anger - always sent me to my room first to "think about it" so by the time the spanking happened I was shaking with fear.

Well, I guess I'm in the minority. I want my child to do what's right because it's right.... not because he fears authority. I don't want to break his will, and I don't want to "train" him. Kids who are trained to *not* think for themselves will grow up to be people who are taken advantage of and exploited. It's unrealistic, IMO, to expect a child to do what they're told for 18 years, then expect them to be good decision makers. Natural and/or logical consequences are the best teachers.

I agree with this - I want my kids to be able to think for themselves. Of course I want them to know the consequences of their actions, but I'm convinced spanking is not the only way to do this. BTW, I don't think spanking is necessarily wrong, but I think there are other ways that I would prefer to try first.

I don't think that has anything to do with spanking. I think that dysfunctional teens are primarily a result of parents who just can't be bothered with their children.

I agree with this 100%. We had an interesting discussion at work yesterday - a few of my colleagues (including me) have at least one parent who is a teacher, and we chatted about our parents' experiences with disobedient kids, and almost without fail the worst cases were also the cases where the parents couldn't be bothered to be involved.

I'm a little tired of the "it happened to me and I'm fine and therefore it must be fine" argument. It's similar to the "my grandpa smoked and got drunk every night and lived to 104, so smoking and drinking must be fine" line of thought. I don't think "this is what my parents did and I'm fine so they must have been right" is the correct way to think about this issue!
 
Upvote 0

hisbloodformysins

He's my best friend
Nov 3, 2003
4,279
217
46
✟5,464.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
I, as some others here might be a little concerned for the op. The op didn't ask "what is your opinion on spanking", but rather she asked very specific questions which are apparently aimed to those who do believe spanking is ok. My concern is that these debates, as fun as they are, are totally moving away from the op's question, and it isn't fair to her.

So, out of respect for the op, let's move this debate to a different thread. I'll start one labled "spanking vs. non spanking" where everyone can feel free to debate away. And if anyone here agrees with me on this, please join me there. I'm only going to start it, it's up to others interested to go there and post.

I know I personally am offended when I start a thread about a specific concern, not asking for opposing opinions, and yet always have someone coming along to state their unasked for opinion that puts down the view I have already taken. I feel angry, and judged. The op isn't saying "I don't know whether I should spank or not" she's saying "how do I do it?". Obviously that isn't a question that invites opinions such as "I don't agree with spanking, it's ignorant, unloving and abusive". That is a slap in the face to the op, atleast that is how'd feel. So, let's keep our opinions to ourselves and debate in a debating thread.

HB
 
Upvote 0

Melbelle

Deadheadmakeup
Mar 22, 2004
28,986
1,570
Texas
Visit site
✟61,379.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have been doing some research on spankin your child, in my research, I have decided I would do a scripture search alone with a google search and the worldly thoughts on this matter, so lets see what the bible says verses the world, shall we?
I'm guessing since this is in the christian part of the forum we all believe everything the bible says right? We do not nit pick out what we want to believe because the whole bible is Gods word not just what we want to believe.
Bible says:
He who spareth the rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him correcteth him betimes (Proverbs 13:24)
Withhold not correction from a child: for if thou strike him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and deliver his soul from hell. (Proverbs 23:13-14)
Prov 20:30 (The blueness of a wound cleanseth away evil: so do stripes the inward parts of the belly.)
1John 1:9 (If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.)
Deut. 25:1-3 ( 1If there be a controversy between men, and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked.
2And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his fault, by a certain number.
3Forty stripes he may give him, and not exceed: lest, if he should exceed, and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem vile unto thee.)
Prov. 22:15 (Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.)
Heb 12:7-11 (7If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not?
8But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
9Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live?
10For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness.
11Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby.)
Eph 6:4 (And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.)
2 Tim 3:16 (All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness
Lev 26:28 (Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins.)
Deut. 22:18 (And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him
1 Kings 12:11 (And now whereas my father did lade you with a heavy yoke, I will add to your yoke: my father hath chastised you with whips, but I will chastise you with scorpions.)
Ps. 6:1 (O LORD, rebuke me not in thine anger, neither chasten me in thy hot displeasure.)
Prov. 3:11 (My son, despise not the chastening of the LORD; neither be weary of his correction
Ex 21:15 and 17 (15And he that smiteth his father, or his mother, shall be surely put to death.
17And he that curseth his father, or his mother, shall surely be put to death.)
Deau. 21:18-21 (18If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them:
19Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place;
20And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard.
21And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.)


From a site on disciplne:
DO NOT FALL DOWN
“Do not fall down in your job as a parent, for you will also be held responsible for the condition of your children’s souls when they are brought to Us.” - Our Lady, February 11, 1971
SPARE THE ROD, SPOIL THE CHILD
Veronica - Now Saint Joachim is walking over; he's standing now between Saint Anne and Our Lady. Now Saint Joachim is standing there. He has a long--it looks like a rod in his hand. And he's standing there holding the rod up, and he's saying:
St. Joachim - "In one hand you will hold the Book of life, and the other, discipline."
Veronica - And he's brandishing the stick, like this.
St. Joachim - "Humanism in your world has been created by satan. You will bring back the adages of old of 'Spare the rod, and you will spoil the child.' Discipline must be returned to the homes.”- July 25, 1973
BE FIRM
"Man has lost his purity. All parents must guard the children's souls. Be firm with your children. The fashions grieve all Heaven.
"The time is short, so you must make reparation now, and learn to recognize the signs. You must be guided by the light. The Holy Spirit will always be with you. Remain close to My Son. So many will be lost.” - Our Lady, August 5, 1970
FIRMNESS IS NEEDED
"I wish that all fathers of households stand forth and practice their role. They will use the rod and not permit their children to go astray. Firmness is needed in your world that is filled with laxity, permissiveness, and degradation.
"Your children have been misled by many who shall answer to the Father. As teachers they have failed in their role. Therefore, as parents you must succeed in yours.” - St. Joseph, March 18, 1973
STRONG DISCIPLINE AND LOVE
"I have asked you, I have directed you, as your Mother, to retire--retire from your world that has been given to satan. You must earn your daily bread by living in the world, but you must not become of the world. Your children must be guided with a strong discipline and love. But this love must be coming from the light, My children, for so few cry love, and they have lost the true meaning of love. For love is your God the Father in Heaven.” - Our Lady, September 7, 1976
Distinguishing Spanking from Abuse
Corporal punishment is often defined broadly as bodily punishment of any kind. Since this definition includes spanking as well as obviously abusive acts such as kicking, punching, beating, face slapping, and even starvation, more specific definitions must be used to separate appropriate versus inappropriate corporal punishment.
Spanking is one of many disciplinary responses available to parents intended to shape appropriate behavior in the developing toddler and child. It is an adjunctive corrective measure, to be used in combination with primary responses such as restraint, natural and logical consequences, time-out, and restriction of privileges.
Child development experts believe spanking should be used mainly as a back-up to primary measures, and then independently to correct deliberate and persistent problem behavior that is not remedied with milder measures. It is most useful with toddlers and preschoolers from 18 months to 6 years of age, when reasoning is less persuasive.
Moreover, child development experts say that spanking should always be a planned action by a parent, not an impulsive reaction to misbehavior. The child should be forewarned of the spanking consequence for each of the designated problem behaviors. Spanking should always be administered in private. It should consist of one or two spanks to the child's buttocks, followed by a calm review of the offense and the desired behavior.


Spanking

The Act: Spanking: One or two spanks to the buttocks

The Intent: Training: To correct problem behavior

The Attitude: With love and concern

The Effects: Behavioral correction

Physical Abuse

The Act: Beating: To strike repeatedly (also kick, punch, choke)

The Intent: Violence: Physical force intended to injure or abuse

The Attitude: With anger and malice

The Effect: Emotional and physical injury


The following is a quote from Dr. Laura Schlessinger's book, Parenthood by Proxy: Don't Have Them If You Won't Raise Them:
Over my years in broadcasting, I have been amazed at the growing sense of impotency in parents. Often when I make concrete suggestions the response is, "But isn't that kind of tough? I mean--doing that will have a long-range effect on their lives."
As will the results of their acts of defiance! This is why I always recommend creative, swift and terrible action so that children take their parents seriously and learn "the lesson" permanently. This technique works wonders with children used to continuous pouting, arguing, negotiating, manipulation, and who easily tolerate feeble consequences to behave badly. (p. 187)
********
Christopher Lasch quotes from Arnold Rogow, who argues that
American parents, alternately "permissive and evasive" in dealing with the young, "find it easier to achieve conformity by the use of bribery than by facing the emotional turmoil of suppressing the child's demands." In this way they undermine the child's initiative and make it impossible for him to develop self-restraint or self-discipline; but since American society no longer values these qualities anyway, the abdication of parental authority itself instills in the young the character traits demanded by a corrupt, permissive, hedonistic culture. (Christopher Lasch, The Culture of Narcissism, p. 178)

The following is a quote from Dr. Laura Schlessinger's book, Parenthood by Proxy: Don't Have Them If You Won't Raise Them:
A major source of today's parenting problems is the psychologizing of our culture. In Grandma and Grandpa's time, misbehavior was viewed as a moral issue of right and wrong, acceptable and unacceptable, permitted and not permitted. Simple as that. Basically, kids were kids; that is, narcissistic, antisocial, noisy, nasty, distracted, and so forth.
The old solution would be punishment. The goal of the punishment was to teach accountability, self-control, the consequences of wrong choices, thinking before acting, and the important fact that they are obligated to respect rules of authority.
Then came the shrinks. The psychology community suggested that bad behavior is either the result of some psychological problem (low-esteem is a favorite) or some biological problem (brain chemistry and food allergies are popular).
The basic notion is that the child ultimately lacks free will. Since he is so upset or so gene-dysfunctional, he cannot consciously choose his actions; he is mysteriously driven by powers beyond his control. It follows that if he is not in control, he is not responsible. This means that discipline and punishment are bad; understanding is good.
The end result of this is disaster. The perpetrator is the victim. (And don't forget, the abused victim is now entitled to perpetrate ... and so it goes.) The perpetrator need only point some finger of blame at a past experience and, abracadabra, escape wrath and punishment and obtain a perverted sainthood all at once!
Parents are intimated by this psychological garbage into backing of from disciplining--instead shellacking their children with a coat of understanding, acceptance, and patience.

I took alot of this from websites that speaks of discipline.
Now here is what some people say about (Does Spanking Work for All Kids?)
Does Spanking Work for All Kids?

Q:I have spanked my children for their disobedience, and it didn’t seem to help. Does this approach fail with some children?
A: Children are so tremendously variable that it is sometimes hard to believe that they are all members of the same human family. Some kids can be crushed with nothing more than a stern look; others seem to require strong and even painful disciplinary measures to make a vivid impression. This difference usually results from the degree to which a child needs adult approval and acceptance. The primary parental task is to see things as the child perceives them, thereby tailoring the discipline to his or her unique needs. Accordingly, a boy or girl should never be so likely to be punished as when he or she knows it is deserved.
In a direct answer to your question, disciplinary measures usually fail because of fundamental errors in their application. It is possible for twice the amount of punishment to yield half the results. I have made a study of situations in which parents have told me that their children disregard the threat of punishment and continue to misbehave. There are four basic reasons for this lack of success:
1. The most common error is whimsical discipline. When the rules change every day and when punishment for misbehavior is capricious and inconsistent, the effort to change behavior is undermined. There is no inevitable consequence to be anticipated. This entices children to see if they can beat the system. In society at large, it also encourages criminal behavior among those who believe they will not face the bar of justice.
2. Sometimes a child is more strong-willed than his parent—and they both know it. He just might be tough enough to realize that a confrontation with his mom or dad is really a struggle of wills. If he can withstand the pressure and not buckle during a major battle, he can eliminate that form of punishment as a tool in the parent’s repertoire. Does he think through this process on a conscious level? Usually not, but he understands it intuitively. He realizes that a spanking must not be allowed to succeed. Thus, he stiffens his little neck and guts it out. He may even refuse to cry and may say, “That didn’t hurt.” The parent concludes in exasperation, “Spanking doesn’t work for my child.”
3. The spanking may be too gentle. If it doesn’t hurt, it doesn’t motivate a child to avoid the consequence next time. A slap with the hand on the bottom of a multidiapered thirty-month-old is not a deterrent to anything. Be sure the child gets the message—while being careful not to go too far.
4. For a few children, spankings are simply not effective. The child who has attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), for example, may be even more wild and unmanageable after corporal punishment. Also, the child who has been abused may identify loving discipline with the hatred of the past. Finally, the very sensitive child might need a different approach. Let me emphasize once more that children are unique. The only way to raise them correctly is to understand each boy or girl as an individual and design parenting techniques to fit the needs and characteristics of that particular child.
 
Upvote 0

Linnis

Legend
Jun 27, 2005
12,963
534
✟38,168.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I spanked my nephew twice in his life, both times as a last resort and because he was doing something VERY dangerous, life threatening. I do regret doing it and will strive never to hit my son.

I believe hitting with an object is wrong, so is hitting enough to cause pain. Spanking on a bare bum is very wrong. I think the only point is to add humiliation to the punishment. I will strive to teach my child the right way, instead of punishing when it's done wrong and do so without hitting.
 
Upvote 0

bliz

Contributor
Jun 5, 2004
9,360
1,110
Here
✟14,830.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I, as some others here might be a little concerned for the op. The op didn't ask "what is your opinion on spanking", but rather she asked very specific questions which are apparently aimed to those who do believe spanking is ok. My concern is that these debates, as fun as they are, are totally moving away from the op's question, and it isn't fair to her.

First, it is always very intresting to me that some people become very concerned about the OP's wishes when a lot of posters are disagreeing with them. Second, the OP posted in June. I don't think she's still hanging on to every word.

I know I personally am offended when I start a thread about a specific concern, not asking for opposing opinions, and yet always have someone coming along to state their unasked for opinion that puts down the view I have already taken. I feel angry, and judged. The op isn't saying "I don't know whether I should spank or not" she's saying "how do I do it?". Obviously that isn't a question that invites opinions such as "I don't agree with spanking, it's ignorant, unloving and abusive". That is a slap in the face to the op, atleast that is how'd feel. So, let's keep our opinions to ourselves and debate in a debating thread.

If an OP posted "I was raped and I am pregnant and have decided to have an abortion. Which method should I use?" Would you feel compelled to weigh in on the advantages of suction over saline methods? Or would you feel compelled to post "Please, please don't kill your baby!"? That's not what the OP asked about, but that is the response you might care to give.

(No, I am not comparing spanking to abortion.)

Part of the deal with posting online is that one cannot dictate what people will say in response to a question or statement made. People will react how they react. If OPs are unahppy, they themselves can ask people to limnit their discussion (which sometimes works) or they can ask that the thread be closed or, and this is really outrageous, they can stop reading the comments so that they won't be offended!
 
  • Like
Reactions: lin1235
Upvote 0

dpadre

Regular Member
Sep 15, 2006
1,188
98
Kansas
✟17,960.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Hi I have a few questions about spanking. I am a parent struggling to discipline my children. I discipline in love not anger.

Here are my questions.

1. Should a hand or object be used? What object do you use to administer a spanking?

2. Should it be done over clothing or bare bottom? Some say it's more effective bare bottom.

3. How many swats should be given? When do you stop the spanking?

4. What do you do if they try and kick and get away during a spanking?


Hope some good chrisitan parents can help

Thanks

Kim
We have 4 children. Our Basic rules have always been this.
From the time they where born to the time they realize, No means No! if a behavioral problem needs to be addressed, we would put the child in time out, always let them know why and what they can do to correct the behavior. We Always tell our children that we Love them.
Every Child is different and it is up to the parent to determine if the child knows what No means. It is a parents responsibility to teach them. Only when they are testing you or purposely disobeying you, We used time out.
When time out becomes ineffective, due to the age of the child, We Spank, with our Hand, using you're hand and allows you to actually feel how hard you are spanking them. There is no sense in Spanking a Child to hard, or as hard as you can. There is nothing wrong with a little sting, but to bruise or injure a child is abusive.


OK here is the Main Rule for Spanking or Time Out:


For every year old the child is, than they receive either that many minutes in time out, or that many Spankings.

If you think about it, a 3 year old only needs 3 minutes in time out. A 7 year old child only needs 7 spankings.
I hope this helps anyone who needs a good rule of thumb! It works, always tell them what they've done wrong, and how to correct it for future reference and tell them you Love them =)

Christ-B-With-U! DPadre
 
Upvote 0
B

Beth1231

Guest
I remember when I was 12 and said something disrespectful to my mother. I had to go to my room and wait for my dad to get home so he could "talk" to me. I was in tears and afraid when he came up the stairs (just as I was so many other times in my childhood). Only this time was different. He gently talked with me and ended the talk with "you're too old to spank now. I want you to help me in the yard for two hours tomorrow." It was like a gigantic weight came off my chest. No more fear, Daddy? No more humiliation and crying and pain? It marked the turn of our relationship. I started opening up to my dad about things that were going on in school, my hopes and fears and dreams. We went on shopping trips together, walks and long drives. We developed a precious friendship that remains to this day.
However, when I look back and see what might have been if only my Dad had known about gentle discipline and child development and natural, healthy growth I am so saddened. If he had only known that it takes repetition and patience and natural consequences to teach a child rather than fear and intimidation, my childhood memories of him could have been as sweet as the memories I have after I turned twelve.
Our first child is due in June and I've talked at length with my husband about this. To say that our children will not respect my husband because he does not resort to hitting them is ludicrous. They won't have memories of waiting in their room awaiting pain and humiliation. The pattern is going to be broken with us. I know it won't be easy, because it's so much easier to just spank and see immediate results. But all that is really happening is behavior modification on the outside. On the inside, painful memories are being stored up along with confusion about the ones who are supposed to love them the most. That's all I have to say for now.
 
Upvote 0

joanna1

Veteran
Jun 18, 2006
2,558
234
✟26,377.00
Faith
Christian
Spanking on a bare bum is very wrong. I think the only point is to add humiliation to the punishment. I will strive to teach my child the right way, instead of punishing when it's done wrong and do so without hitting.
I couldn't agree more. I actually find the idea of spanking on a bare bum deeply perverse, and i believe i would have experienced it as sexual assault had I ever been submitted to it. I now many adults carry deep wounds throughout their lives because of this, in fact i was reading a shocking article on the matter just the other day. I'll try and find it; here goes:
http://www.geocities.com/cddugan/RoyLessinOpenLetter.html
 
Upvote 0

annaapple

Senior Member
Nov 19, 2005
747
18
✟23,487.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is one of the saddest threads I have ever read. Needless to say, we don't spank. I am not fully against it but I would never do it. If you must resort to this form of punishment, my response to the original questions would be:

1 or 2 hits has got to be enough, never cause pain, never use an object, never do it on the bare bum.

Using Proverbs to justify the behaviour is inconsistent - I assume none of you would stone your rebellious teenager to death, even though that is the recommended course of action in Deuteronomy. Plus there's a lot of debate about the rod scriptures - they could be referring to the shepherd's staff which guides the sheep by steering, rather than hitting.

See also http://www.naturalchild.org/jan_hunt/tenreasons.html

and the non punitve househoilds thread.
 
Upvote 0

joanna1

Veteran
Jun 18, 2006
2,558
234
✟26,377.00
Faith
Christian
My two sons are spanked for certain behaviors. We have them go to their rooms to wait for the spanking. After about 10 minutes we will come in and talk with them. Then they get the spanking. We spank with a paddle here. It is done on the bare bottom. They get one swat per age.
This sounds very much like the process described in the link i posted, please read it... It's a letter from a spanking receiver.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 29, 2006
2,361
193
✟18,367.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Gee, this thread got very long so I just skipped to the end, sorry if my answers are redundant!! BTW - my DD is almost 2, this is what we do at the moment, that may change as she gets older and is more able to predict and understand.

1. Should a hand or object be used? What object do you use to administer a spanking? Me, I just use my hand, my DH would possibly use a wooden spoon if needed at some stage...

2. Should it be done over clothing or bare bottom? Some say it's more effective bare bottom. We usually smack on the upper back thigh, if she's only in a nappy/underwear then it's on the skin, otherwise in clothes, we don't strip her for smacks.

3. How many swats should be given? When do you stop the spanking? from me she'll get about 2 or 3, DH maybe 5 at most, I think that is plenty.

4. What do you do if they try and kick and get away during a spanking? Well she's still little so I pick her up so she can't get away...


Í don't want to get into an argument with anyone here, my answers may sound harsh to some who are convicted otherwise. My advice is that you never want to hurt your child, but they need to know that something is not appropriate behaviour. And you and your partner need to be able to support each other and decide together. I also think discipline needs to come from BOTH parents, not making one parent out to be the 'mean' one, and when administered in a loving, caring, happy, fun, stable environment a little punishment does not scar.
That is just my opinion...
 
Upvote 0

BananaCake

Veteran
Dec 6, 2006
1,210
41
✟24,072.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Also remember Ephesians 6:4 - "provoke not your children to wrath,"

and

Colossians 3:21 - "provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged."

I think spanking makes children angry, and that it's disrespectful to hit people just because they're smaller than you. You wouldn't hit your spouse if he or she did something wrong, would you?

I think there's a lot to be said for common sense and not taking the Bible literally. Proverbs also says to finish your outdoor work and get your fields ready before building your house. Do any of you live that way? I doubt it. Much of the Bible is a product of its times. People hit their children back then because they didn't have TV or PlayStation to take away. I think that using the Bible as a parenting manual is scary, to be honest. The Bible also tells you that if you have a disobedient child, you should take him to town and have him stoned. Would you do that just because the Bible says so?

Jesus stood up against the stoning laws when He refused to stone the woman caught in adultery.

I'm a fence-sitter when it comes to spanking, but I think we should respect the OP's wishes and not use this thread for debate. There are plenty of other threads where you can debate this topic, or you can start your own.
 
Upvote 0

sparassidae

In Christ Alone
Apr 3, 2007
2,477
167
Sydney, Australia
✟25,903.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I hadn't seen this thread before, thanks for bumping it up to the first page.

We really don't like smacking, and only do it as a last resort, if other discipline/punishment (I know they are not the same btw) is not working eg withdrowal of priviledges, time out.

1. We would only ever use our hand- there is not the same danger of causing too much pain as it would hurt me as well.

2. Definitely smack through clothing- the humiliation of a bare bottom is not worth it.

3. Only ever 1 smack is given. Otherwise I think the danger is there is keep going.

4. If they try to get away we would hold the child by the upper arm.
 
Upvote 0