- Aug 11, 2017
- 25,846
- 8,377
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
Ummmm, no because that's how one deals with DATA.
Sorry, I have developed a habit of dealing with data over my 25+ years as a research scientist.
Well....I'll stick with a career's worth of experience with data over what you bring to the table any day of the week.
Let me ask you something...
If we have 1000 people: 870 are white and 130 are black. 122 white people are poor and 18 black people are poor which population has the higher rate of poverty?
By your estimation the whites are much worse off, right? I mean look at the numbers! 122 poor white people and only 18 black poor people.
Is this an example of runaway white poverty?
Just curious what you see.
Ok let me explain this another way. 20% of blacks are in poverty and this is because of racism right? So why is it that the other 80% of blacks apparently aren’t being discriminated against? On top of that the out of all ethnic groups how many are in poverty as a result of racism? Is it only the blacks? Is it the blacks and Native Americans? Are the Hispanics included in this theory of yours? What about the Asians, they have the lowest poverty rate does that mean they receive the lowest amount of discrimination? Tell me this out of all the ethnic groups is it only the whites that aren’t in poverty as a result of racism? Would you say that all other groups are in poverty because of racism except the whites?
Upvote
0