Some honest answers please...

[dad]

Let's discuss what you see there. Can you see the meander?

It is pretty hard to miss.

Do you know what a meander is?

What about it?

 

[dad]

And have you watched the videos yet dad? You can't even begin to comment on the evidence until you watch the videos.

Point out something in a video that supports you? Looking at the second video I see the guy rattle on using dates without any support for them. Is that it?!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Point out something in a video that supports you? Looking at the second video I see the guy rattle on using dates without any support for them. Is that it?!

If you can't be honest there is no point in doing this. You lose by default. If you disagree with any date we can always look it up.

 

[Subduction Zone]

What about it?

We know how meanders form. They form in relatively slow moving streams. Do you need support for this fact?

 

[dad]

If you can't be honest there is no point in doing this. You lose by default. If you disagree with any date we can always look it up.

The dates are false. You can't support them.

 

[dad]

We know how meanders form. They form in relatively slow moving streams. Do you need support for this fact?

If the formation was post flood, how would that matter?

 

[Subduction Zone]

The dates are false. You can't support them.

Wrong. You know that and I know that.

You believe in a myth. You should not break the Ninth Commandment by making claims about others that YOU cannot support.

 

[Subduction Zone]

If the formation was post flood, how would that matter?

We will get to that later. Do you understand that that is a meander? If you doubt me I Google searched the term "meanders" and clicked on images. This is the search that came up:

meanders - Google Search

If you look at those images you will see this one among them.

 

[TagliatelliMonster]

EDIT

Just got back from a well earned vacation and second thread I post in, turns out to be another necro from 2002

Should I even ask who did it?

 

[AV1611VET]

Should I even ask who did it?

Welcome back!

 

[dad]

Wrong. You know that and I know that.

You believe in a myth. You should not break the Ninth Commandment by making claims about others that YOU cannot support.

You cannot support the dates, they are belief based entirely, and are based squarely and exclusively on a belief in same state past. Either strongly support/evidence/prove there was one or the dates have no reality or meaning whatsoever.
If you thought you were going to use beliefs in claims about the flood as science, forget it. It won't happen. Get over it forever.

 

[dad]

We will get to that later. Do you understand that that is a meander? If you doubt me I Google searched the term "meanders" and clicked on images. This is the search that came up:

meanders - Google Search

If you look at those images you will see this one among them.

At first appearance it looks like it. Now tell us what geological era this was laid down? Tell us where it is. Etc. Oh, and do tell us a point also, how you think this proves there was no flood! Ha.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You cannot support the dates, they are belief based entirely, and are based squarely and exclusively on a belief in same state past. Either strongly support/evidence/prove there was one or the dates have no reality or meaning whatsoever.
If you thought you were going to use beliefs in claims about the flood as science, forget it. It won't happen. Get over it forever.

LOL!! You crack me up dad. The dates given are civilization after civilization that did not notice the flood at all. Dates are not based upon a "same state past".

dad loses again!

If you want to discuss a date pick one out.

By the way dad, when a person makes a claim the burden of proof is upon him. Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "different state past", you lose.

Are you ready to defend your made up concept?

 

[Subduction Zone]

At first appearance it looks like it. Now tell us what geological era this was laid down? Tell us where it is. Etc. Oh, and do tell us a point also, how you think this proves there was no flood! Ha.

Patience dad. It is clearly a meander. Why do you think that it is not? It is in Utah. And what do you mean by "what geological era this was laid down". You are not clear what you are talking about.

It is apparent that you can see that this is a meander. Are you ready to go on?

 

[AV1611VET]

If you want to discuss a date pick one out.

4 BC.

Who is governor of Syria?

 

[Subduction Zone]

4 BC.

Who is governor of Syria?

I would have to look it up, but I know who it wasn't.

 

[dad]

LOL!! You crack me up dad. The dates given are civilization after civilization that did not notice the flood at all.

Those civilizations were all post flood. Gong!

If you want to discuss a date pick one out.

Name one in your video.

By the way dad, when a person makes a claim the burden of proof is upon him.

Your picture is a claim. You must do more than post a pic.

Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "different state past", you lose.

Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "same state past", you lose.

 

[dad]

Patience dad. It is clearly a meander. Why do you think that it is not? It is in Utah. And what do you mean by "what geological era this was laid down". You are not clear what you are talking about.

It is apparent that you can see that this is a meander. Are you ready to go on?

Was it cut out in the Cambrian...or etc etc?

 

[AV1611VET]

Or we could discuss this video:

* *​

Or we could discuss this video:

* *​

No thanks.

I don't have a burning desire to put science ahead of God.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Those civilizations were all post flood. Gong![/quoite]

Really? When was the flood? If you want to make that claim you need to be able to prove it. Until you do you have nothing. Those civilizations all existed when literalists like you claim that the flood existed.

By the way "Gong"ing when you have not made a point is a form of dishonesty. Doing so again is admitting that you lost and we will be done here.

Name one in your video.
Your picture is a claim. You must do more than post a pic.[/quoite]

Nope, you already tipped your hand. Tell me when your mythical flood occurred first.

Unless you can find some clear reliable evidence for your "same state past", you lose.

That has been done countless times. The radioactive decay rates observable from distant novae confirm that the laws of physics were the same in the past. You on the other hand have nothing.

Remember dad, the least little bit of evidence beats no evidence at all. You have seen those articles in the past. I can link them again.

You have not provided any evidence at all for your different state past. You set yourself up to lose.

Again.