Some honest answers please...

[Subduction Zone]

Was it cut out in the Cambrian...or etc etc?

No, it was cut out in the last few millions of years. Geologically it is fairly recent. Why do you ask? It shows that your flood did not exist.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No thanks.

I don't have a burning desire to put science ahead of God.

No one is putting science ahead of God. That is your error. You keep trying to tell God how he had to make the Earth when his work, if he did in fact make the Earth, tells you that you are wrong. By arguing with science you are trying to argue with God.

 

[AV1611VET]

No one is putting science ahead of God. That is your error. You keep trying to tell God how he had to make the Earth when his work, if he did in fact make the Earth, tells you that you are wrong. By arguing with science you are trying to argue with God.

Read what I said ... slowly.

You'll get it.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Read what I said ... slowly.

You'll get it.

Oh I got it. You made the same mistake that you always do.

 

[dad]

Really? When was the flood?[/QUOTE] I place it at about the KT layer which is something like 70 million so called science imaginary years ago. That is my opinion subject to evidences as of this time.

The radioactive decay rates observable from distant novae confirm that the laws of physics were the same in the past. You on the other hand have nothing.

Not at all. You don't even know the distance to any star. Or size.You just thought science did.
There is no reason to think that the formation you posted a pic of was pre KT layer is there? Ha.

 

[dad]

No, it was cut out in the last few millions of years. Geologically it is fairly recent. Why do you ask? It shows that your flood did not exist.

Well, it is irrelevant then.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Really? When was the flood?

I place it at about the KT layer which is something like 70 million so called science imaginary years ago. That is my opinion subject to evidences as of this time.[/quote]


You don't seem to understand that there was no flood. And man did not exist 65 million years ago.

dad, when your arguments are inconsistent, as they just were, you lose. You need to come up with a consistent argument so that you do not continually refute yourself.

Not at all. You don't even know the distance to any star. Or size.You just thought science did.
There is no reason to think that the formation you posted a pic of was pre KT layer is there? Ha.

Wrong again. You have lost that debate as well. At best you can only claim that YOU do not know the distance to any star. Please watch the Ninth Commandment violations. When you make a statement about someone else that you cannot substantiate then that is a "bearing of false witness".

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well, it is irrelevant then.

Nope. Try again.

 

[dad]

man did not exist 65 million years ago. [

Neither did earth. The imaginary years cannot be supported. Either try, or lose them.

At best you can only claim that YOU do not know the distance to any star.

The basis for distances is well known. If you can't debate the issues, don't waste our time.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Neither did earth. The imaginary years cannot be supported. Either try, or lose them.
The basis for distances is well known. If you can't debate the issues, don't waste our time.

dad, you are simply wrong. Now if you want to believe in a myth that factually is no different from a fairy tale tell me. There is no real helping you if that is the case.

When it comes to the sciences your lack of education puts you at a distinct disadvantage. Why don't you try to learn first?

 

[dad]

dad, you are simply wrong.

Incessant denial and an inability to even begin to defend your so called evidence is very clear with you. It is stark. Why would anyone bother to address your defeated whails and ravings?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Incessant denial and an inability to even begin to defend your so called evidence is very clear with you. It is stark. Why would anyone bother to address your defeated whails and ravings?

Yes, we know that those are your tactics.

And dad, watch the false claims. You are the loser here. You always have been. Once again, you are violating the Ninth Commandment.

When you are ready to learn I am here to help you.

 

[dad]

Yes, we know that those are your tactics.

And dad, watch the false claims. You are the loser here. You always have been. Once again, you are violating the Ninth Commandment.

When you are ready to learn I am here to help you.

You pretended for a long time you had evidences of no flood. When forced to show your hand, you offered a pic that you had no explanation for. (which when we finally got the details was from a post flood layer anyhow)

Then you spammed a few third rate videos you could neither discuss nor support. Then you try to blindly use dates you could never begin to support. You can't get any further than that level of time wasting religion.

Move on.

 

[lesliedellow]

You pretended for a long time you had evidences of no flood. When forced to show your hand, you offered a pic that you had no explanation for. Then you spammed a few third rate videos you could neither discuss nor support. Then you try to blindly use dates you could never begin to support. You can't get any further than that level of time wasting religion.

Move on.

The words pot, kettle and black come to mind.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You pretended for a long time you had evidences of no flood. When forced to show your hand, you offered a pic that you had no explanation for. (which when we finally got the details was from a post flood layer anyhow)

Then you spammed a few third rate videos you could neither discuss nor support. Then you try to blindly use dates you could never begin to support. You can't get any further than that level of time wasting religion.

Move on.

dad, we were discussing one piece of evidence that tells us that there was no flood. YOU ran away again. You could not be honest. Please note the title of this thread.

You got to be so bad I asked you if you could not be honest what was the point.

Now do you want to begin again?

Please do not tell false stories about others. On the dates I asked you to pick one since you claim that your mythical flood occurred. You know that if given a date to your flood it will be refuted.

So once more, can you be honest? I would appreciate a yes or no answer to that question. Right now your dishonesty has caused your defeat again.

 

[dad]

The words pot, kettle and black come to mind.

I have never pretended science knows there was a flood or not. Keep trying you may hit target one day.

 

[dad]

dad, we were discussing one piece of evidence that tells us that there was no flood. YOU ran away again. You could not be honest. Please note the title of this thread.

You got to be so bad I asked you if you could not be honest what was the point.

Now do you want to begin again?

Please do not tell false stories about others. On the dates I asked you to pick one since you claim that your mythical flood occurred. You know that if given a date to your flood it will be refuted.

So once more, can you be honest? I would appreciate a yes or no answer to that question. Right now your dishonesty has caused your defeat again.

Nothing to say about how all you did was offer dates with no attempt to support them as if they meant something eh? Can't drink your kool aid.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Nothing to say about how all you did was offer dates with no attempt to support them as if they meant something eh? Can't drink your kool aid.

dad, you are not being honest. I asked for specific dates that you wanted supported. YOU ran way. I asked you when your mythical flood was. YOU ran away. I can't support dates that you do not ask about. I am not about to support all of them. There is no point. The flood that you believe in lasted for a year. Give me a date and then I will support it.

So far your answer to my "Yes" "No" question has been a "No".

 

[Subduction Zone]

The words pot, kettle and black come to mind.

Actually it is more like the dingy old corroded pot calling the stainless steel kettle black. I have tried to engage the man in an actual conversation, but he keeps running away and making claims that he refuses to support.

 

[Roseonathorn]

I believe we are created spirit, soul and body but still three in one. The same way God created the universe. We do not find heaven in space either. It is another dimension. We can not go there in Our physical form. If evolution was proven true as most say it is I believe I would still not loose my faith, but I would very much doubt that evolution was true. It once was "true" that the earth was flat too and if We went too far We could fall off. I have hard to believe that nothing itself could produce space from nothing. Then a light, then molecules that turn into dust and planets and fire and gas and explode in a big bang and somehow the series of events creates all kinds of animals and humans from fish without the hand of God. But I do believe that the ant does not know all there is to know about the worldevents today, worldhistory and so on, but it knows enough. Me neither, I do not know it all, I need to rely on Gods grace. But I have been created with a body and a brain and some creating curiosity, however I do have limits to that too. And without God we could not even question if the universe was created by God or by itself. It would all collapse. That is my belief. But who could truly prove the evolutiontheory but God. He is the only one that has lived that long.