God declared His day--as He told Adam and Eve--don't eat of that tree--it was plain enough--the 4th is plain enough--it is clearly stated.
Please point out the verse in scripture where God clearly and specifically commanded Adam and Eve to observe a sabbath day. I cam find where he commanded them not to eat of the tree of Knowledge of Good and evil...that's a clear commandment. Anyone can find it. No such commandment for a sabbath day.
Seems highly unlikely for God to get all riled up about a piece of fruit. He said don't do it--they did. He said worship me this day--enough said. Cain didn't think it was a big deal to worship God his own way either.
God didn't get riled up about a piece of fruit. If he hadn't put anything like that in the garden, then Adam and Eve would have no occasion to exercise their free will and make a choice whether or not to serve God and remain in the garden without sin. It could have been anything, but God chose a tree with fruit.
Gen 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
Gen 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.
There is no commandment there for humans to observe a sabbath day. You may also notice that there is no evening and morning to complete that day. His work was finished on the sixth day and his seventh day is still ongoing, just like the rest we have in Jesus is still ongoing.
There were no Jews in the Garden of Eden when He established it.
He never commanded anyone in the garden to ritually observe a sabbath. Their life in the garden was an ongoing sabbath. The ritual weekly sabbath was established as a sign of the covenant to the Israelites at Sinai (and it specifically says there in scripture that the covenant was NOT with their ancestors) and was to temporarily last for *their* generations (not Gentiles) until old heaven and earth (Jerusalem) passed away. Which it did in AD 70 when Jerusalem and their Temple was destroyed. Now we await the new heaven and earth, the new Jerusalem.
And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: What do you think He meant by that seeing as the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath?
Because Jesus recognized that the Pharisees were abusing it. The sabbath was intended to be a benefit to the Israelites and their ancestors, not a burden.
Exo 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
He did--it's called the 4th commandment.
The fourth commandment TO the Israelites at Sinai and their descendents. Not to Gentiles. Not to anyone else.
The apostles didn't have to shout it out--they lived it as did Jesus---They were Jews! There was almost a civil war when they said circumcision was no longer needed---had that been the case with the Sabbath, another very Sacred thing to all of them--WWW 1 would have erupted. But since nobody said such aa thing--why would it need to be mentioned?
Because maybe there were Gentiles, lots and lots of them once Paul came around, becoming converted from paganism to The Way that would have had no clue whatsoever about a sabbath, having never had to observe a sabbath or any other Jewish rituals or laws. And yet it's not emphasized ANYWHERE in the new testament because it has never applied to Gentiles and Gentiles are not bound by old covenant law and never have been.
The mark of the beast has to do with worship--obviously, since it says "and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years."
Since it is about worshiping what is obviously not God--which in itself is breaking another commandment--"thou shalt have no other gods before me" -- why would you think this has anything to do with covenant's?
To interpret it as the specific day you decide to worship God though is extremely far-fetched and requires a lot of very imaginative ways of combining cherry-picked scripture verses together to come to such a conclusion.
No, the apostles did not meet on the 1st day of the week to worship on Sunday. There is not one verse that states they worshiped on that day.
Yes, they did, and it is all over the new testament what day of the week followers of The Way were meeting on, and the day of Christ's resurrection, and the day of Pentacost, etc.
he reason RCC can claim they changed the day is because they did.
No they didn't. The old covenant seventh day sabbath is still Saturday.
The disciples did not, nor did Jesus. Name one verse that states The first day if the week will now be the new Sabbath in honor of my resurrection?
There is no verse because you are misinterpreting why most Christians meet on the first day of the week. It has nothing to do with observing a sabbath and everything to do with celebrating Christ's resurrection. Christians aren't moving the sabbath from one day to another because there is no requirement to observe a ritual weekly sabbath under the new covenant, so Christians would not be observing a sabbath on *any* day. Or perhaps it's more accurate to say that Christians are always observing a sabbath because we are resting in Jesus day by day as we walk with him.
Anything that God made Holy, can only be made unholy by Him. He wrote it, Jesus would have clearly said He changed it. Never did.
Old covenant gone. All the jots and tittles of old heaven and earth have passed. Jesus did say this.
The sabbath does still exist though...in HIM.
As to why non-Catholics are wanting this--because they follow tradition instead of the plain it is written. Doesn't matter to them, t's a day off. I personally don't care what day of the week the Sabbath day is--could be Tuesday for all I care---who it does matter to, and who said it is this day only---is God--And Him I don't think I will argue with about it. He made it Holy--that is enough for me.
If you want to observe a physical sabbath day, then that's your choice. Many Christians do observe a sabbath day of rest because it is healthy. It still acts as a means of grace for growing in spiritual maturity and deepening our relationship with God. It's just no longer a ritual commandment under law.
It has all the legal authority of the governments of those countries. And by government decree---it affects every single citizen of those countries. It is the law of the land.
I am personally against laws that limit people's religious freedom, even for non-Christians, and even for religions Christians are naturally opposed to. If the government tried to make observing a seventh day sabbath illegal, I would be opposed to that law.
It is not SDA that define Christianity--it is the RCC by law defining Christianity. Denominational narcissism---always has been.
Then there is no need to allow them to define it for you, but it might also be a good idea to recognize they don't define it for the rest of us either. I know in my own denomination, there would be a mass exodus if our conference were to force us under the rule of a pope or the papacy, and I would be one of them. Not that I believe it would happen because we have a global democratic conference, but I suppose if the Evangelicals are right and the anti-Christ turns out to be a person who will set up a one world government and one world religion, then true believers would be called out of that system.
Yep--they just did not change the commandment of God.
It will be--it is their aim, always has been. There have been several Protestant churches that have gone back to the RCC-- also in the UK--it is what the ecumenical movement is all about--unity--but under the Pope.
Why allow yourselves to be defined by the RCC? Who cares what they say if you're not a part of their organization? Catholics who believe that there will be in any way wide-scale unity with them while there is a papacy or pope in existence are very deceived, and even then there is all the stuff with Mary and the saints and confession to other human beings, statues and religious icons everywhere, etc. Many protestants are about as anti-pope (*any* pope) as one can get. In fact, people in my region will leave their churches if they even have the appearance of being in any way Catholic.