Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not exactly, but He taught that: The time is coming when the Father will be worshipped in the Spirit. When do you think that time was/is? How do you worship God in the Spirit?So Jesus removes for me the need of worship God only?
I noticed that you don't have a response to that Biblical argument. I can only surmise that you don't accept it.The sabbath and all the law are removed (was temporary). That is where the argument has led. Did you not see that?
I don't know about you, but for me Jesus hasn't removed my need to worship God, but given me the freedom to worship Him whenever and wherever I may be.
Now you're complaining about your own choice of words. You still haven't acknowledged my post on this thread.The bible does not argue, and certainly. It states.
Fixed your verb to reflect the singular.The Sabbath is part of the ten Commandments, therefore if the ten Commandments were was temporary so likewise the Sabbath.
That is God's solution, which provides salvation to the Gentiles and entrance into His rest. The Sabbath met the same disposition by the hand of God as the covenant declared from Mount Sinai Moses named the Ten Commandments.
Hebrews 10Does your priest give burnt offerings as the Law requires?
8 Previously saying, “Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin You did not desire, nor had pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the law), 9 then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.” He takes away the first that He may establish the second. 10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
No? See Numbers 28:9-10.
Judaism revolves around the first covenant.
Christianity revolves around the new covenant called 'second' in this epistle.
The two are not compatible.
The responses on this thread make the answer obvious.If God explained the Sabbath commandment as a covenant between Himself and the Children of Israel, who would say different?
The sabbath and all the law are removed (was temporary). That is where the argument has led. Did you not see that?
You haven't stated anything when you haven't acknowledged my post, be it "truth" or otherwise. For once you slipped and admitted the temporal nature of the Mosaic covenant and the Sabbath dependent on it, and since that post you've done nothing but flee from the truth of God's Word.It's a non issue, I have stated the truth about the matter. Your rejection has nothing to do with me.
I hope this is good enough for you. In accepting God;s word i have to reject your post.You haven't stated anything when you haven't acknowledged my post, be it "truth" or otherwise. For once you slipped and admitted the temporal nature of the Mosaic covenant and the Sabbath dependent on it, and since that post you've done nothing but flee from the truth of God's Word.
You're playing games to avoid God's Word, and the present reality of the new covenant dependent on the temporal nature of the old covenant. That you briefly admitted this reality only to turn away from it shows others that you know your opinion is anything but Biblical.I hope this is good enough for you. In accepting God;s word i have to reject your post.
Fixed your verb to reflect the singular.The Sabbath is part of the ten Commandments, therefore if the ten Commandments were was temporary so likewise the Sabbath.
That is God's solution, which provides salvation to the Gentiles and entrance into His rest. The Sabbath met the same disposition by the hand of God as the covenant declared from Mount Sinai Moses named the Ten Commandments.
Hebrews 10Does your priest give burnt offerings as the Law requires?
8 Previously saying, Sacrifice and offering, burnt offerings, and offerings for sin You did not desire, nor had pleasure in them (which are offered according to the law), 9 then He said, Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God. He takes away the first that He may establish the second. 10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
No? See Numbers 28:9-10.
Judaism revolves around the first covenant.
Christianity revolves around the new covenant called 'second' in this epistle.
The two are not compatible.
Why do you insist on doing as you did with my post and not reflect the whole matter. Are you being purposefully deceptive? That post is in reply to someone stating that the Sabbath was temporary, and my response was that the law would also have to be temporary if the Sabbath was temporary since is part of the ten Commandments.You're playing games to avoid God's Word, and the present reality of the new covenant dependent on the temporal nature of the old covenant. That you briefly admitted this reality only to turn away from it shows others that you know your opinion is anything but Biblical.
I don't remember who it was who pointed that out to you, but I picked up on it and showed you that it is supported by Scripture. With Scripture as the final arbiter of what I accept, the temporal nature of the Mosaic covenant and the Sabbath dependent on it is factual. You admitted as much, only to flee from this:Why do you insist on doing as you did with my post and not reflect the whole matter. Are you being purposefully deceptive? That post is in reply to someone stating that the Sabbath was temporary, and my response was that the law would also have to be temporary if the Sabbath was temporary since is part of the ten Commandments.
Here you're making reference to a parallel thread, and not this one. Review the conversation and see for yourself that it has been your insistence that the seventh day isn't a day in the singular, and in your mind you've replaced the seventh day with a repeating weekly Sabbah - of which quick and dirty calculations shows there were 73,320 or so Sabbaths in the weekly cycle, not including the annual Sabbaths, all during the tenure of the Mosaic covenant they depend on to exist. The last time I checked, anything measuring 73,000+ quantity is not a singular entity.You are insisting on showing how ridiculous your idea is aren't you? You want everyone to accept against biblical statement by God himself that the Seventh day is not a day. We have the first to the Sixth day then the Seventh but the seventh is not a day. That is what your position mean. Silly!
What happens? On the day, the seventh day God rested. The same day He made holy and blessed it. Ex 20 says the same thing and states that it is also called the Sabbath.Gen 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
Gen 2:2 By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.
Gen 2:3 Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?