A clear acknowledgment that your post was at best disingenuous and more accurately, simply dishonest would be welcome. That would do you immense credit and demonstrate that you are, apart from the occassional slip up, a person of integrity.Are you looking for an answer, or an apology?
Yeah, we all saw your answer where you tried to get around it bny saying both yes and no. No one was fooled.
I'm looking for you to actually think for yourself and not try to have it both ways just because you can't deal with the cognitive dissonance.
A clear acknowledgment that your post was at best disingenuous and more accurately, simply dishonest...............
Rabbits eat their own poop
"This process is known as coprophagy, and functions the same as cows chewing their cud."
No. Dishonest. It is unseemly to provoke by lying. You should have a word with your minister/pastor/priest if you think otherwise.
I had a lovely weekend away, thank you. But now I'm back, let's post a few of your lies and contradictions. Will you accept 3 examples as adequate evidence? There are more, but it would be tedious to post them allYou are not a scientist. You may go away.
vsEvolution --> Atheism.
Theistic evolution is quite different from atheistic evolution.
Evolution says: human evolved from chimp.
But evolution is different. It says chimp changed to human.
vsIf you think we are just another animal and is a product of evolution, then you are right.
Origin of human being.
Evolution would never make it happen.
I had a lovely weekend away, thank you. But now I'm back, let's post a few of your lies and contradictions. Will you accept 3 examples as adequate evidence? There are more, but it would be tedious to post them all
Evolution is both atheistic and theistic:
vs
Humans evolved from chimps. This has been corrected after each repeated post, but it keeps coming back. Here we have just two examples of many:
Humans are the product of evolution but evolution could not make humans:
vs
Why do I want to correct your mistakes?
I didn't make any mistakes. You want to pretend that I did.Why do I want to correct your mistakes?
I didn't make any mistakes. You want to pretend that I did.
Do you want to admit now that you lie on this forum, or will you continue claiming otherwise?
And not even a very good one...
Cud is not poop, unless you are a desperate creationist.
digest it a second time.
"The writers"? Are you saying Genesis was not written by God? There are several members here who would take you to task over that insinuationThe writers were being kind to the readers. Everybody who raises rabbits knows that they recycle their food a second time and it's a reasonable reason not to use them as food. Cud is an "idea" and it's fascinating that cows got mentioned.
"The writers"? Are you saying Genesis was not written by God? There are several members here who would take you to task over that insinuation
The consensus and tradition is that the writer of Genesis was Moses who was the editor of a number of source materials he gathered. Not that consensus or tradition has any effect on the historical events.
When my mother in law died, my wife and here sister argued over a similar crystal salad bowl and they haven't spoken since. If you want it, make sure your name is on the bottom.And it's tradition in my family to believe that the cake tin we bake birthday cakes in was forged from a meteorite that fell in the Himalayas and was formed into a cake pan by blind Tibetan monks before it found it's way to the K-mart store where we bought it in the 1980s.
"The writers"? Are you saying Genesis was not written by God? There are several members here who would take you to task over that insinuation
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?